What about the effect its had on children? Latchkey kids and such. and the feminism movement. I believe its good for a woman to work and have the
right, and for that matter equal rights as all should. But what effect has it has in a whole? It has made your points be able to exist....
This is a strong belief of mine that taking women out of the home, essentially destroys the family unit. Of course, this is not always the truth,
many many people including my self had wonderful mothers that juggled a full time job with raising an entire family, and I have even more respect for
single mothers (and fathers).
But the drive to destroy the Feminine and replace it with this gray shaded neutrality has not been beneficial at all to Humanity. Women wanted to
work, and now they can.. in fact.. they are now expected to work 40+ hours a week PLUS cook the food, shop, clean, teach, drive kids to practice, be
an emotional provider, etc, etc, etc. Women are NOT better off, they are worse off, and so are our children. Honestly, is it any wonder we have
gender confused kids, detached manic depressive kids, violence never before seen, and so on. I believe it all comes back to the Family, and how it
was slaughtered for the sake of "Progress".
I'm sure you made the title of your thread sexist on purpose to generate attention but I ask you this...
My title is a Copy and Paste from an article (see link) from the Irish Times online Newspaper.
If you're placing your whole argument on a dual income family, while single out the female? Why is it the womans fault?
The Dual Income argument is made that, in this case, Ireland, during the Celtic Tiger years they saw a huge increase of women in the work place.
Specifically, in bureaucratic government positions, service, and health care. The argument being that in Traditional Ireland pre 1990's boom, the
majority of households where Single Income, and that by doubling the working population through women the sudden explosion of income compared to
property values (and consumer prices) caused an extensive inflationary spiral in the markets.
This is actually economic fact, it cannot be argued. You take one income and make it two, prices WILL rise according to the money supply. your
argument of "why women" is philosophical I suppose, but most psychologist would probably agree a male is not as nurturing as a female.
Have another shot and think before you thread. I'm expecting your next thread to read: Females Responsible For Govt Crisis-Revoke Their Right To
Hmm, I think I will get started on it...