It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The 9/11 Operation: A Summary

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 11:30 AM
I just used this piece of info as reference on another thread but thought it maybe worth its own thread:

I'm hoping that people review this summary with an open mind and realize that something must be wrong with the OCT when someone not involved can come up with this report!

I applaud the a to z of the author!

[edit on 27-2-2009 by zerozero00]

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:01 PM
It still amazes me...I mean just one piece of evidence is enough but with the stack of evidence that has grown and is impossible to deny. If this case ever got to a court it would be an open and shut case.

Good post.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:05 PM

From your link right at the top

The booking of seats on certain pre-ordained flights was artificially kept low; those coast-to-coast flights were booked by 20% instead of the usual 75% in order to minimize deaths, which could cause problems if “highly connected” individuals were wantonly sacrificed. If the flights were real, the passengers on them had to die (or at least disappear). Two of the flights were probably nothing but fictitious, real only on radar screens, which minimized the amount of passengers to be murdered.

Ok. think about it for a bit.
try at least
you fly planes into buildings, killing 3000 people
you keep the booking low to minimize deaths

And you honestly dont see anything wrong with this picture?

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:11 PM

That is the only response I expect!

and your right, if this ever made a court the evidence is huge!

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:17 PM
reply to post by debunky

Ok a little personal ad-lib is your only problem? or is the whole piece rubbish?
You see It don't matter what individual puts what out on the net...their own emotions tend to take over and spoil the project.......sorry!

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:36 PM
Lets try again:
You fly planes into buildings, killing 3000 people

You go through lenghts to make sure that not too many people are on the planes, because they might get hurt when colliding with the buildings.

I must be honest: i didnt read on after that. I promise i will if you can explain to me why the deaths on the planes were to be avoided while the deaths in the collapsing buildings weren't.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 12:45 PM
all i can say to you is " operation Northwoods"!!

Read the whole piece...can you do that??

Please, as a piece of fiction, please read the piece!!

I asked to read with an open mind!!

if you read the whole thing and then have some questions then great

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:21 PM

Originally posted by debunky
Lets try again:
You fly planes into buildings, killing 3000 people

The planes didn't kill 3000 people when they hit the towers, nor did the planes have anything to do with the towers coming down.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by _BoneZ_]

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 04:32 PM

Originally posted by zerozero00
Please, as a piece of fiction

"Operation Northwoods" was not a piece of fiction.

posted on Mar, 1 2009 @ 03:02 PM
reply to post by zerozero00

Tried to read it with an open mind but that didnt work because there were too many lies in the first ten paragraphs. I mean, it claims that USAF 767 tankers were used......except that the USAF DOESNT HAVE ANY. Or did you miss that whole thing a couple years ago when the contract was cancelled...and then awarded to Airbus..and then cancelled again....

posted on Mar, 2 2009 @ 09:10 AM
One thing about the "767 tanker"


The first 767 tanker was not sold until 2002 with delivery in 2005 (Italy)
Japan bought some too for delivery in 2007!

Even then Boeing had problems with the design

Geez - dont this clowns ever bother to look things up .....


log in