posted on Feb, 21 2009 @ 04:59 PM
Well, you called for more opinions, but I'm sorry to say that I find your premise to be highly naive. You have fallen into a common trap, perpetuated
by the MSM: that there are only two options of interpretation when pondering terrorist acts:"freedom fighter" or "terrorist."
As the globalists like to say (and they should know as they are often the actual sponsors of this terror) there is also a "third way:" state
sponsored false-flag terrorism. That is, state security forces infiltrate existing cells of malcontents, and use them as "patsies" to carry out
plots that they themselves have created and planned, to serve specific political purpose.
The July 7th bombings in London, the Red Brigade reign of terror in Italy, the OKC bombings of the Murrah Building, and the 1993 attack on the World
Trade Center have all been exposed as this kind of operation.
You may think that this is tinfoil-hat paranoia, but far from it. Abundant proof exists in the public record to prove each claim.
You can--and should--Google my assertions. To wit:
*the London bombings: a security consultant twice announced on the BBC that he was war-gaming the actual events of 7/7 in London, in real
time, when the war game "went real" and actual bombs went off.
*Initial, live, onsite reports from the Murrah Bldg in OKC reported overwhelmingly that bomb squads had discovered several small charges inside the
non-collapsed part of the bldg. This is corroborated by testimony of the participants themselves. I personally remember that day and seeing several of
those reports. None of this appeared afterward in the trial of McVey, who was the classic patsy. Fuel-fertilizer bombs simply cannot produce the
intensity of blast effects--the "overpressure," or psi of force--necessary to destroy half of the concrete reinforced building in question. The
gov't's case is simply a physical impossibility.
*The FBI supplied the actual bomb that exploded in the WTC in 1993. Yes this is true. It is proven by actual court transcripts of the trial of the
"jihadists" carried out in Manhattan afterward. Find them and read them. It is also corroborated by one of the jihadists themselves, who taped a
conversation with his FBI handler, because the mole/patsy himself was shocked that the FBI had given the terrorist cell a real bomb, and not the fake
that he was led to believe they were going to supply them. Incredulous, and furious at the FBI, this informant taped his conversation, and released it
to the public. It has never been debunked.
Summation: wake up. You're being lied to and manipulated to push an agenda of creeping fascism and the loss of civil liberties for the sake of
But security from whom is the real question.
[edit on 21-2-2009 by gottago]