posted on Feb, 18 2009 @ 05:57 PM
reply to post by czacza1
Hrm... this doesn't seem right...
Look at the time differentials... 4 hours on Sept 11, 24 hours for the tsunami?
It is starting to seem like they wait for an event to happen... then check the tickers... and lo-and behold! a spike happend x number of hours ago...
When the reality would be, that the spikes are statistically determined to happen repeatedly... and look after the fact...
Lets see them put thier money where their mouth is... press release: "Machine going bonkers! be prepared!" then, if something significant happens,
lend it a little more creedence...
I'm not closing the door on this yet... but they defenitely need to devise a hypothesis they can test more accurately... not something they are using
results to determine the experiment... that's backwards...
Still Skeptical, but still listening... Just give me something a little more adherent to the scientific method... Predict an event BEFORE... not
retroactively evaluate the data after the event happens...
Would also like to know if all these machines are displaying the same spikes at the same time... That would be very telling as well...
anyway, for those interested, I found a site that shows the graph in real time...
gcpdot.com...