It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander
Maybe most of the atrocities were NOT carried out by Stalin, but Trotsky and Lenin.
Both of whom adhered to Marxism!
Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to post by melatonin
Lamarkism came BEFORE Darwin.
(Though, they seem very similar.)
Why would these communists laud Darwin, if it didn't help them kill religion?
Originally posted by projectvxn
Yes religion IS an idea that can be held closed-minded. Because there are rules in religion that say God thinks for you. The job of the scientist at this point would be to find a wedge in which they can explain themselves without offending sensibilities. This whole idea that Religion and science HAVE TO BE mutually exclusive is ridiculous..
I say this because the words "Let there be light" sounds alot like the big bang to me.
Originally posted by melatonin
Anyone with even the most basic of knowledge of what evolutionary theory is would see that the very notion of communism and socialism is completely in contrast to evolution by natural selection. It is more fitting of capitalism in mechanism.
Originally posted by projectvxn
You can and should ignore the talking snakes and zombies
Originally posted by melatonin
Perhaps. Of course, without wanting to offend sensibilities, the bible also proposes talking snakes and zombies roaming the holy land.
Originally posted by moocowman
Religion does not require evidence, it requires faith which is the opposite, with science we can learn the hows. With religion we can learn , ah well nothing really only how to suspend critical thinking and reason.
Originally posted by Clearskies
Please, don't EVER link to a pdf file without a warning!
My computer almost shut down!
Thanks!
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by melatonin
True. But it also describes the rise of the continents much as would a scientist. You can and should ignore the talking snakes and zombies, but how do you explain cell mitosis to an unsophisticated cultures existing 3000 years ago? This is something that I think religious people should understand. If they studied science as much as the denounced it they would see the parallels between the two.
Originally posted by projectvxn
Now, if this is true, then the Bible is just an allegorical science book, then it does, in fact hold some sort of credibility. So then one must ask:
Where did the Bible come from that it is so accurate?