It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Surface to Air batteries at the Pentagon?
I am involved in a forum discussion on the web concerning the 9/11 incident at the Pentagon. Some people contend that there are automated surface to air missile batteries at the Pentagon. I do not believe, from what I have been able to gather in regular news sources that there are SAMs at the Pentagon. Can anyone in this project provide an authoritative answer to the question of whether SAM batteries exist at the Pentagon, when/if they were installed, etc.? Thanks in advance. 99.232.67.58 (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Originally posted by Stillresearchn911
reply to post by TrueAmerican
I was thinking the same thing, Pinch wants to sit there and tell you how much he knows about this wonderful weapon and all the programs he is privy to but yet he can't answer the OP simple question "Did the Pentagon have the M61 on 9/11?" You always bless us with your presence but never answer any of the questions that only a guy like you could answer.
Anyways TA I'd have to say IMO from what I have gathered the Pentagon has never had the Phalanx(M61) neither on 9/11 or to date. As far as the supposed missile batteries I have seen nothing to support this either. I may be wrong but I believe the defense of the Pentagon was/is supposed to be afforded by the surrounding air bases, along with multiple surrounding (non air) bases. Maybe Pinch can indulge us without to much of his classic smack talk.
Originally posted by pinch
The Pentagon has never ever had any "close in weapons system ("CIWS" or Phalanx), either.
The defenses for the building from any airborne attacks are in the location of the structure, not in any point-defense missile system.
If anyone wants to really hitch their wagon to April Gallop regarding these fantasies, go find her and demand she tell you *where* those SAM missiles were.
The only missiles that were ever set up in this area (DC) were the old Nike system from the 50's and 60's, and those missiles were in Maryland and other areas around northern Virginia - miles and miles away from the Pentagon.
Radar is the neads controllers' most vital piece of equipment, but by 9/11 the scopes were so old, among other factors, that controllers were ultimately unable to find any of the hijacked planes in enough time to react. Known collectively as the Green Eye for the glow the radar rings give off, the scopes looked like something out of Dr. Strangelove and were strikingly anachronistic compared with the equipment at civilian air-traffic sites. (After 9/11, neads was equipped with state-of-the-art equipment.)
In order to find a hijacked airliner—or any airplane—military controllers need either the plane's beacon code (broadcast from an electronic transponder on board) or the plane's exact coordinates. When the hijackers on American 11 turned the beacon off, intentionally losing themselves in the dense sea of airplanes already flying over the U.S. that morning (a tactic that would be repeated, with some variations, on all the hijacked flights), the neads controllers were at a loss.
"You would see thousands of green blips on your scope," Nasypany told me, "and now you have to pick and choose. Which is the bad guy out there? Which is the hijacked aircraft? And without that information from F.A.A., it's a needle in a haystack."
At this point in the morning, more than 3,000 jetliners are already in the air over the continental United States, and the Boston controller's direction—"35 miles north of Kennedy"—doesn't help the neads controllers at all.
Link
He tells the Battle Cab he wants Fox to launch two more fighters from Langley Air Force Base, in Virginia, to establish a greater presence over New York, but the request is refused. The order from the Battle Cab is to put the Langley jets on battle stations only—to be ready, but not to launch.
"The problem there would have been I'd have all my fighters in the air at the same time, which means they'd all run out of gas at the same time," Marr later explained.
Incredibly, Marr has only four armed fighters at his disposal to defend about a quarter of the continental United States. Massive cutbacks at the close of the Cold War reduced norad's arsenal of fighters from some 60 battle-ready jets to just 14 across the entire country. (Under different commands, the military generally maintains several hundred unarmed fighter jets for training in the continental U.S.) Only four of norad's planes belong to neads and are thus anywhere close to Manhattan—the two from Otis, now circling above the ocean off Long Island, and the two in Virginia at Langley.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This just wont die will it? You'd think if there were supper duper anti missile systems in Washington that day it would have come up in the discussion at NEADS.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Either you are avoiding my question, or you are not reading the thread, WP.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
I am specifically trying to determine whether Phalanx was in place covering the Pentagon on 911.
Originally posted by TrueAmericanSince you have such a background, maybe you could comment on that, without accusing us of being so ignorant.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Also, I'm supposed to believe they placed a Phalanx system on top of the Pentagon and called it a day? A quick brief of the Phalanx will tell you why this is very very unlikely.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
But that doesn't mean it wasn't hidden, or was somewhere else COVERING the Pentagon. That is really all that matters for the purposes of what I am specifically seeking.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Now obviously from your tone, you are not sure either.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Being a Navy guy, he's more familiar with the Phalanx, and hence we get this illogical claim, IMO.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Now obviously from your tone, you are not sure either.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Ok, I'll be sure to drop the idea just because you say so, and disregard the author's brother.
So what happens in the event an enemy "suicide" ship manages to get close enough in the Atlantic somewhere to fire such a missile at the Pentagon? Or the White House, Navy Annex, or any number of other important buildings?
You telling me they can't shoot it down? Or what if it came from an air-launched attack?
... there would be no logical reason other than LIHOP or MIHOP that any missile or plane of any kind could actually get all the way to the Pentagon and hit it.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
So what are all the possible anti-airborne threat systems that could have been in place covering the Pentagon on 9/11, given your knowledge of weapons development time lines? We've discussed Phalanx, and you mentioned Avenger, so is there anything else that would qualify to you as "technologically logical"?
Originally posted by pinch
How about I categorically state that I am *sure*, 100%, no if's, and's or but's about it, no maybe's, no perhap's, no "Its classified", no "If I told ya, I'd have to kill ya" about it - there has never been, never was, never ever a CIWS installed or mounted or planned for use at the Pentagon. Clear enough?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Oh, you made that quite clear, thank you. And so now I will ask you if you have, on a need to know basis, *classified* knowledge of the specific Pentagon defenses in place at the time to be able to really make that claim?
I find your reference "ugly baby" to be curious.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by pinch
April herself said she got a classified tour of Pentagon defenses. If there was nothing classified about it, why would she make that statement? Are you calling her a liar, when she was clearly there and is filing a fricken law suit over the fact that she did not receive any evacuation order? And she clearly states that TO THIS DAY she cannot comprehend how those CLASSIFIED defenses could have possibly failed?
4. In the attack on the Pentagon, in particular, plaintiff avers that the official story, that a hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon and exploded (causing the plaintiff’s injuries), is false. In fact, the bombing was accomplished another way, so as to limit the damage, protect the defendants, and only make it appear that a plane had been crashed into the building.
Was there CIWS/Phalanx covering the Pentagon on 911, and if so, why didn't it engage protecting the building? Was it because of some kind of IFF that it did not engage or was it because of Cheney's stand down order?
Second of all, are you basically admitting then that CIWS can indeed fire at friendly targets?
First of all, if what you say is actually true, and the Pentagon could not defend itself against an air attack, then we surely had idiots for military commanders. This is THE PENTAGON we are talking about here, not Granny's kitchen down the street. I just simply refuse to believe that, because IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, despite your attempts to belittle my sense of critical thinking skills.
She can't divulge that to anyone without a need to know and the proper security clearance. It clearly states that her defense tour was classified.
Originally posted by CameronFox
She is a liar. PERIOD
Please explaoin to me TrueAmerican why she received a settlement from American Airlines, AMR Corporation, and Argenbright Security(CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:03-cv-01016-AKH) when she states in her most recent lawsuit that the plane did not even HIT the Pentagon?
Your search - 1:03-cv-01016-AKH - did not match any documents.
I asked SPreston this too on another April Gallop thread and he abandoned it.
4. In the attack on the Pentagon, in particular, plaintiff avers that the official story, that a hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon and exploded (causing the plaintiff’s injuries), is false. In fact, the bombing was accomplished another way, so as to limit the damage, protect the defendants, and only make it appear that a plane had been crashed into the building.
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:08-cv-10881-DC
Read the emphasized section then keep reading. She states that "in fact" the bombing was accomplished another way!
Your search - 1:08-cv-10881-DC - did not match any documents.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
No there was not a CIWS at the Pentagon on 9/11. The Pentagon lies in the approach/departure of Ronald Reagan National Airport and had there been a CIWS system...you would have been seeing aircraft being dropped out of the sky long before 9/11.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
And she has already violated security in talking about it to begin with.
So, your argument holds no water.
Thats the other telling thing about her story, if it were true...she would be in custody for violating security regs.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
For simply stating that she received a classified tour of Pentagon defenses? They put you in the brig for that?
Operations security (OPSEC) is a process that identifies critical information to determine if friendly actions can be observed by adversary intelligence systems, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.
Link