It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why would Obama have to?
Originally posted by Keyhole
Looks like Obama isn't wasting any time!
This is what a lot of people were hoping for!
All those times Bush invoked "executive privilege" weren't always because of national security.
It was to hide something a lot of the times!
Why should he have invoked "executive privilege" on things such as:
an EPA investigation
the Valerie Plame Leak
the US attorney scandal
the FBI's misuse of crime informants
Dick Cheney's meeting with energy executives
And many more ridiculous ones like this that weren't invoked for national security reasons, but to protect people from the law, or to hide something incriminating or against his "views".
National security should be the only reason a president can invoke "executive privilege", and Obama is going to make it harder to invoke executive privilege from now on.
I'll bet ole George W didn't like hearing this!
www.motherjones.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 1/21/2009 by Keyhole]
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
but answer my first question and say...yeah he has sucked so far....and there ya go, you be ignorant...and that is per se.
Originally posted by Asherah
This news gave me a hearty chuckle over my morning coffee, just thinking about the look on W.'s face. I guess he thought he'd scoot on off to Texas without a hitch.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
BTW - the title of this is completely wrong. No where did Obama say to bush - 'I can release your records. Don't like it? Sue!'
"[Obama]'s putting former presidents on notice that if you want to continue a claim of executive privilege that [Obama] doesn't think is well-placed, you're going to have to go to court," says Anne Weismann, the chief counsel for Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW).
******SKIP******
Weismann explains:
[Obama]'s basically saying if there's a dispute, and a former president thinks something should be covered by executive privilege and Obama doesn't agree, then Obama would direct the Archivist to release it [despite the former president's claim of privilege]. The only option a former President would have at that point would be to go to court and sue.
Originally posted by Keyhole
Looks like Obama isn't wasting any time!
This is what a lot of people were hoping for!
All those times Bush invoked "executive privilege" weren't always because of national security.
It was to hide something a lot of the times!
Why should he have invoked "executive privilege" on things such as:
an EPA investigation
the Valerie Plame Leak
the US attorney scandal
the FBI's misuse of crime informants
Dick Cheney's meeting with energy executives
And many more ridiculous ones like this that weren't invoked for national security reasons, but to protect people from the law, or to hide something incriminating or against his "views".
National security should be the only reason a president can invoke "executive privilege", and Obama is going to make it harder to invoke executive privilege from now on.
I'll bet ole George W didn't like hearing this!
www.motherjones.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 1/21/2009 by Keyhole]
> [Original Message]
> From:
> To:
> Date: 1/14/2009 9:12:07 AM
> Subject: Library Question - Answer [Question #4100727]
>
>
>
>
> Dear David,
>
> The Library of Congress does not collect every document, nor does it keep
every document. This policy is outlined in all of our policy statements,
which you can read at:
> . This is even more true for the Web
site, and its thousands of iterations since 2001. If you want to view
archived editions of our Web site for that year or any other, go to the
Internet Archive page for loc.gov:
. We are sorry you think
that subsequent editions are "dumbed down," as we are always striving to
improve the content and format for our users.
>
> We have searched for your Martin Marietta annual report, but as
described, this document does not appear in any of our catalogs or indexes.
You are free to search our online catalog yourself, at:
. Searches can be constructed with keywords,
corporate names and countless other options, in a variety of combinations.
>
> A broader catalog of resources that includes materials held in libraries
around the world, and includes many not held by the Library, is at:
. If you search for "Martin Marietta annual
report," you will find that this series is held in a number of US
libraries, but NOT at LC.
>
> For reports from DOE you can search the public, open-access site, DOE
Information Bridge, at: . Some of
these materials are available in full-text online.
>
> Other free and open resources for technical reports include the Defense
Technical Information Center: , and the National
Technical Information Center, .
>
> If you are particularly interested in government reports in general, we
recommend that you ask your local librarian for the nearest location of the
indexes of government and military technical reports, dating to the 1940s.
Between the current DTIC and NTIS indexes and these, all available
technical government reports will be listed. LC does have a large
collection of old technical reports, and reproduction services are
available through the Photoduplication Service, but you have to identify
the report by its Publications Board (PB) number in order for us to see if
we have it. We searched the Bibliography of Scientific & Technical Reports
and found nothing under 'iridium.'
>
> A full list of indexes and descriptions and additional information on
locating technical reports is available at the Technical Reports Section
Web page, . They also
hold a large collection of DOE reports, and more information is on this
page, . For details
you can contact them directly.
>
> If you are particularly interested in topics related to extra-terrestrial
origins and life beyond Earth, please take a look at our guide,
"Extraterrestrial Life," published in 2007, and online at:
.
>
> And everything you might possibly want to know about Iridium itself, is
in the Wikipedia entry at: .
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Science Reference Section/mrc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------
>
> Question History:
>
> Patron: I know for a fact and without question the LOC has information on
Iridium 115 experiments done in the early 1940's and later. It is an
element obtained from meteorites which is not found on earth but is space
oriented in origin. It is heavier than lead in it's unexcited state and
becomes lighter than hydrogen when an electrical current is passed through
it. To prevent overheating of components, etc. used in the experiments a
magnesium based, white chalky like fiber board was used as an insulater. It
is a perfect substance for anti gravitic flight and I'm curious why I can't
find it anymore. The day after I researched it on the LOC's site in 2001
the site closed for reconstruction after which it became a dumbed down
version of it's former self where nothing of any real interest could be
found. I still have the original PC used so I'm sure since I used Print
Screen and what not I could still extract it from the memory. That and the
2001 Annual Report to the Vice President issued by Martin Marietta
Cambridge, Tn. requesting additional fencing and an extension of the fence
area to keep the EPA from discovering the high soil saturation of open air
bomb testing of things like Scarlet Fever, Typhoid, Malaria, Bubonic
Plague, an airbourne strain of HIV/AIDS, and the like- some 14 diseases
exploded in the air in all. And other such topics are no longer seemingly
available. Will you please find and send me data the Iridium 115
experiments and the 2001 Annual Security Report to the US Vice President by
the Martin Marietta (DOE) at Cambridge, Tn. Or would you deny you have such
things in your records or on your micro film caches. I'd hate to have to
pull the info off the PC I used to find it from the LOC in the first place.
I watch Law & Order and CSI, it can be done. Like I say, it's not a
question of if you have it. I'm 100% confident you do. The question is why
can't I find it now that your site was conveniently revamped in 2001, the
day after I pulled up the material from you, and will you send it to me now
so I don't have to go through the trouble of pulling it off of the old PC.
Thank you. I look forward to a favorable response.
>
> Librarian 1: Dear David,
>
> The Library of Congress does not collect every document, nor does it keep
every document. This policy is outlined in all of our policy statements,
which you can read at:
> . This is even more true for the Web
site, and its thousands of iterations since 2001. If you want to view
archived editions of our Web site for that year or any other, go to the
Internet Archive page for loc.gov:
. We are sorry you think
that subsequent editions are "dumbed down," as we are always striving to
improve the content and format for our users.
>
> We have searched for your Martin Marietta annual report, but as
described, this document does not appear in any of our catalogs or indexes.
You are free to search our online catalog yourself, at:
. Searches can be constructed with keywords,
corporate names and countless other options, in a variety of combinations.
>
> A broader catalog of resources that includes materials held in libraries
around the world, and includes many not held by the Library, is at:
. If you search for "Martin Marietta annual
report," you will find that this series is held in a number of US
libraries, but NOT at LC.
>
> For reports from DOE you can search the public, open-access site, DOE
Information Bridge, at: . Some of
these materials are available in full-text online.
>
> Other free and open resources for technical reports include the Defense
Technical Information Center: , and the National
Technical Information Center, .
>
> If you are particularly interested in government reports in general, we
recommend that you ask your local librarian for the nearest location of the
indexes of government and military technical reports, dating to the 1940s.
Between the current DTIC and NTIS indexes and these, all available
technical government reports will be listed. LC does have a large
collection of old technical reports, and reproduction services are
available through the Photoduplication Service, but you have to identify
the report by its Publications Board (PB) number in order for us to see if
we have it. We searched the Bibliography of Scientific & Technical Reports
and found nothing under 'iridium.'
>
> A full list of indexes and descriptions and additional information on
locating technical reports is available at the Technical Reports Section
Web page, . They also
hold a large collection of DOE reports, and more information is on this
page, . For details
you can contact them directly.
>
> If you are particularly interested in topics related to extra-terrestrial
origins and life beyond Earth, please take a look at our guide,
"Extraterrestrial Life," published in 2007, and online at:
.
>
> And everything you might possibly want to know about Iridium itself, is
in the Wikipedia entry at: .
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Science Reference Section/mrc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To check the status or the history of your library question(s), go to:
www.questionpoint.org...
[email protected]&qid=4100727
>
> Please take a moment to fill out a survey at:
www.questionpoint.org...
uage=1&type=ask&qid=4100727
>
>
>
>
> You have submitted a question to the Science Science Reference
Section of the Science, Technology and Business Division of the Library of
Congress. Your question will be assigned to a reference specialist
and we will attempt to answer it within 5 business days. If, after 5
business days you have not received a response from us, please go to the
acknowledgement email that you will receive and reply to it, to dialog with
the reference section to determine the status of your question.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> The Science Reference Section
>
>
Originally posted by PhyberDragon
In 2001 the LOC had in it's possession DOE Tennessee Valley Authority Martin Marietta at Cambridge Tennessee's Security Report to the Vice President which may explain their EPA and Cheney's meeting with the Energy Executives.
Here is my request for it and the response.
Originally posted by jam321
We already know Congress isn't going after Bush.
I don't know, there has been a couple of them (in Congress) that really wanted to see him fry on the skillet, who's to say they lost their passion for that cause yet?