Originally posted by defcon5
. . . .
Though I don't understand how you were able to pay less then the minimum interest payment each month and not end up in foreclosure. I have heard of
people paying the minimum payment then sending a second check in each month to be applied to the principal.
The advice I got was to pay a monthly amount which would initially be 90% of the monthly interest charge. As time went on inflation would lower the
value of the dollar, diminishing the amount of the loan relative to my income. Therefore paying the same proportion (1/4) of my income would
eventually cover it all. It looked fine on paper, but meant I'd be paying off the house, at a comfortable repayment rate, for 45 years.
My objections were:
a, I didn't want to be in debt more than 10 years.
b, I was determined my total interest payment would be less than the principle, and the government scheme would have me paying over twice as much in
interest as I was borrowing,
c, this scheme assumed inflation would continue steadily throughout the next 45 years, and the future is that predictable.
Instead I paid 3/4 of my income. I chose a house close to public transport, so I wouldn't need a car, with space for a large vege garden where I grew
much of our food, and I got an old sewing machine and made our clothes.
However I sympathise with people who fall for the bankers' tricks that keep you in debt forever. We're taught to respect authorities, and these
bankers and economists know much more about borrowing money than most of us.
Many friends of mine thought they were following good advice and laughed at the hardships I put myself through.
But at the end of the day we have to trust our own common sense.
Be beholden to others as little as possible,
know that everyone advising you has their own axe to grind,
and remember that even a top economist, if he's telling you how the economy will go for the next 50 years, is no more reliable than a Blossom
Goodchild.