It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lasheic
There's a reason why real physicists working on stuff like this rarely ever come here or take part in these threads. They'd spend so much time either laughing or refuting bogus assumptions that they'd never get any work done!
Originally posted by Lasheic
I didn't mean to appear to sound condescending, and my apologies if I did.
There are no current systems which are built from an architectural level to learn intrinsically. Such systems have been theorized for awhile now, and some believe that the enabling factors for such a computer are now in place both on the hardware and software side. Indeed, the creation of just such a machine is the goal of the DARPA funded SyNAPSE project.
Science Daily: Building a machine that can learn from experience.
Project SyNAPSE homepage
Insofar as brain scanning, I don't recall what the latest resolution they have is. However, we have a high enough resolution to scan whole regions of the brain and draw up simple block diagrams on how they function and interact. For example, I believe we've already accurately modeled portions of the Neo-Cortex. Further, claiming that they have a long way to go based on relatively little progress is a bit presumptuous I think. The human Genome project was scheduled to be a 15 year project, and 7 years into the project they had only completed roughly 1% of the Genome. However, as new and more powerful technology came out it sped the process incredibly. The vast majority of the work happened in the last few years merely because of the greater horsepower provided by Moore's Law. Indeed, despite a very disparaging start, the project finished ahead of schedule.
So just because there's still a long way to go, I wouldn't necessarily expect it to take a very long time.
Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
YOU only learn through experience. Nobody absorbs knowledge through osmosis. But it would be cool if we could.
Yes, at 58, I happen to be aware of heat, housing, and oh yeah, electric. You just getting out of grade school? Kinda sounds like it.
It is called the Maze of the Many, and it is dark, and ignorant down there.
You touted scientists as laughing at lay members ideas (of ATS & other such forums): talk about being narrow minded.
Suprisingly, Consciousness Evolves: most know this. Yes, there is an aspect of devolution, also
scientists have a bad knack for ignoring the morality of their research & development aspects.