This is extremely odd.
What makes it more odd is that they're not commenting on it.
I don't get how a paper would add something like this without reason or a connecting story, and just leave it there.
The thing that concerns me, is that throughout previous wars, we have had communication of information between groups using print.
During WW2 the allies sent messages through bogus stories in national newspapers. They were used as a tool to convey messages able to be translated
only by a select few.
The modern equivalent of print news is the internet. Able to be read by anyone in any country without a leaking into the mainstream. A site can be
monitored continuously until a message is sent, and not many others would actually be exposed to it as they would be in print. Once it is in print
there is evidence, on a web site it can be removed and then denied, claimed to be fake if it ever surfaces again.
I'm baffled by this.
A part of me says it's an ad campaign for something. Another part of me then says "for what?"
This isn't the kind of paper you'd use to market games and movies. Their audience is not of that caliber.