I don't know the street in NY, but I assume that China Town would be the place to start looking for it.

The picture with the ferris wheel is in London, but perhaps the pieces are actually composites of more than one large city. London and Paris. I would suggest that NY is NY and Hong Kong. That would give you the New HongLon megacity economic trio that drives a good part of the World economy.

So. Supposedly a guy had a friend put it up on a major journal's website. Then Someone tracked a bit of who the guy is, and he fesses up that he did it and intimates that it is "solved" in some way.

So, wouldn't the joural take it DOWN? You know, since it isn't veted, and was never approved?

Sounds more like someone capitalized on a question running around to get himself some interest. An person with an excessive need of being seen as clever and wanting atttention would do that. The attention is the reward for them.

Sure it is possible that the guy was trying to prove something about conspiracies. The layered on thick references to NAU and the Sun aren't hard to get with a small look at any conspiracty website. It doesn't mean anything though as all it proves is that people are naturally curious about oddities, and willing to invest time and effort and risk personal damage to their status to get a good look. All animals run from fires - except chimpanzees and humans, who run TOWARDS fire to see what is going on.

[edit on 2009/1/20 by Aeons]

As I've said before, the Torygraph has been spook central for a long time. For example, they were the ones who broke a "story" about British troops in Baghdad just happening to find documents linking George Galloway to corrupt oil trading. And I think there was a thing where Dominic Lawson was linked to the spooks when he was there.

Normally I'd go and check this out, but I'm feeling lazy.

So what can we say about this blackjack thing?

If it's viral marketing, what is it selling? Can't think of anything.

It clearly took some time and a certain amount of money to put together. Were the pictures of the van photoshopped or were they real? I'd suspect the latter, because most of the photoshop work was pretty obvious. So quite a lot of trouble and a small but not insignificant budget went into this.

Justin Williams wants to draw attention to it, but does not want to be connected with it. The Telegraph staff don't want to answer questions on it. That may be because if anything actually does happen, he knows people are going to come after him about it.

Our security services have already shown they're prepared to kill a few people here to try and promote the War of Terror. The July 7th bombings were clearly orchestrated. Checking back on that stuff, which I hadn't looked into for a few months, I see that there was a story that three men responsible for the bombings had been shot in Canary Wharf. The story was pulled really quickly.

It looks as if the "bombers" (at least one of whom had connections to the security services) thought they were participating in a drill. Why else buy return tickets? When their train was cancelled, and they arrived late, to find that bombs had already gone off, they went to Canary Wharf to alert the media. That's one plausible scenario.

Further, it's interesting that no-one knows who Jean Charles De Menezes was working for. He was an electrician, and the tube explosions were originally reported as electrical faults. Getting rid of him, therefore, might have served two purposes: eliminate someone who knew too much, and get a story for the media to distract them from looking too closely at the July 7 events.

Whether any of the above is true or not, I'm convinced that there's enough evidence to show that the security services had their hand in the bombings. It doesn't seem to have had the desired effect.

I wonder if it's possible to bring a private prosecution against the Telegraph as someone suggested. That might shake something loose...

Well, here is a bit of interesting.

Today on the highway I actually saw a black small suv with a white sun symbol that was very similar to the sun on this presentation. The top and bottom rays were a bit bigger. There was no names on the vehicle.

No, I didn't get a picture. I TRIED to get one, but the cut into the inside lane and drove faster than I could in rush hour traffic. Oh well.

So someone claims that they ACCIDENTALLY picked out NAU, Ouboros, The Sun, Chairman Mao, etc....? That isn't really believeable. I could swallow it as a hoax, but the person still didn't do it by ACCIDENT. Also, the journal would still take it down as an unauthorized posting.

Nope. Not the same person. The creation of the second is different. Too different. There is a consistency to the first part, and none to the second.

I looked again.

The second one is not the same person. They do not have the same imagery manipulation as in the first one. They don't have anything approaching the subtleness of the imagery on the first.

The first was captivating, and curious. The second is hackery and boring with no message at all to it.

I give the first an A. The second is definately C- work.

this is ace i,m alway,s loggin in to see this thread..
dont under stand why it,s so few post,s though

Hmmm...

Maybe it's not the same person. I don't know. The message has changed, though, I'd say.

We now have a plethora of suitcase nukes going off. i'm afraid I find the idea of even one suitcase nuke obtained by any kind of terrorists more than unlikely. It's not that the technology's not there... but it's not going to get into the hands of terrorists. Even if it did, given what the US did to Afghanistan and Iraq on the basis of a false-flag op, I doubt that any politically committed terrorist would use one in the way portrayed.

So... back to the "story": it's clear that the nukes pave the way for the imposition of an international police state, with Canada, Mexico and the US, plus as usual Airstrip One bringing up the rear.

So far, so dreary.

Any more on our Mr. Williams?

Anyone with any direct experience of journalists knows what a thoroughly underhand and repulsive bunch they are in the main (with, of course, notable exceptions). The fact that JW called some people mentally ill is hardly a surprise.

I wonder if the change in direction is to try and deflect from the idea of the Security Services being involved? Of course, it still fits the idea that the NWO do show you what's coming. And let's not forget that the US is trying to unify those countries and introduce a new currency - the Amero - as a counter to the Euro.

Thank God so few Yanks seem interested in this thread, otherwise we'd be inundated with OMG YOU SAW THE VAN WHERE WAS IT IT'S ALL GOING TO HAPPEN WHERE WILL BE SAFE?

Apologies for that somewhat unfair outburst to the saner Americans who similarly disdain that kind of garbage. You know I'm right though.

What do you expect out of people who camp out in closets, plagarize at every opportunity, and drink their three square meals a day?

I've been accused of being anti-American on this forum, but that's a bit strong!

Or were you talking about journalists?

Well I went to the website and found these pics... I havent really looked closely at them yet but thought I would post them before they were removed from the site.







I agree that part 2 doesnt have the same 'flow' as the first. I still dont get why this guy is doing this.... book promo?



[edit on 26-1-2009 by SleeplessInUS]

for some reason my edit did not work so I am adding a third pic off the site here.

Originally posted by rich23
I've been accused of being anti-American on this forum, but that's a bit strong!

Or were you talking about journalists?

Journalists. I'm not anti-American. Actually, while I have dispute with a few ongoing policies of the US Government's International policies I am not Anti-American. I believe that most people who are Anti-First-World are probably significantly self-defeating.

Originally posted by serbsta

Originally posted by orgyofthedead

It appears that the source of all this is a Justin Williams assistant editor of the telegraph.

Im going to try and get in contact with this fella, he seems fishy.

Oh, he's very fishy is Justin

I can't believe this. He's an old friend of mine!

I guess I'd better get in touch with him

Just emailed an old journalists friend who I once worked with in London.

His take is that it's a clever marketing ploy by the ailing newspaper industry. Create some great paranoid mystery, get the conspiracy forums and everyone in every pub talking and wondering.

Supply a mixed bag of symbols, icons, modified photographs. Then let them all run wild making connections.

Free PR.

Will sell more newspapers which means more advertising. A way to keep in business that's cost effective.

It's working beautifully.


This posting will be ignored - watch.


Mike F