When Did You Choose To Be Straight?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 22 times


reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 11:39 PM by meaguire
Originally posted by DantesLost
I would like serious answers please.

This is a question that keeps coming up in threads about homosexuality and it keeps getting ignored by the very people who say that being gay is a choice.


So,if us homosexuals choose our sexuality I would like to know when you heterosexuals choose yours.

How old were you?
5? 15? 21? 35?
Have you always just known?
Were you born that way?

Did you try being gay first?
Did you experiment before making your decision?

When did you choose to let your subconscious,an uncontrollable part of the brain,think of the opposite sex in physical and emotional ways?


Inquiring minds would like to know.




[edit on 25-12-2008 by DantesLost]


I would like to add, that the term 'lifestyle' is an often used term aswell.
Do heterosexuals have the monopoly on 'lifestyles' and homosexuals only have one 'lifestyle'? gay?

Therefore, a lifestyle is a means of forging a sense of self and to create cultural symbols that resonate with personal identity. Not all aspects of a lifestyle are entirely voluntaristic. Surrounding social and technical systems can constrain the lifestyle choices available to the individual and the symbols she/he is able to project to others and the self.[2]\
en.wikipedia.org...

a 'lifestyle' seems to be based upon culture, country, social and economic wealth. Homosexualsity exist within all cultures, countries and economic statis, yet are labelled as a 'lifestyle'.

can anyone explain the term 'lifestyle' applied to homosexuality and do people really believe homosexuality is a 'lifestyle' considering what 'lifestyle' means?


reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 11:57 PM by drsmooth23
Originally posted by paperplanes
I think the opinion of most in the anti-homosexual crowd is that heterosexuality is the default for humans


so if you're straight your anti homosexuality?

?? how is "straightness" NOT the DEFAULT?!? there is a pretty good reason most people are not asexual. I dont have a problem with people who treat everyone like they are people. but ANYONE of ANY orientation/race/religion can be a blight on the human race.

oversexed Media and anti-social conventions play a great deal into a persons orientation. but it is MUCH more than that. You could write 20 books about the subject and you would still barely scratch the surface.

I never chose to be straight, I just am, because it feels so good. I imagine the opposing view feels good too, but that is anatomy for ya. my Ex-Fiance chose to become a lesbian after years of heavy drug use and a few engineered opportunities for more drugs "threw" her into a scene that rewarded live group voyeurism and her willingness to do ANYTHING she needed to do for more coke. I know that is the exception, and not the rule, and i am in no way saying drug use makes you gay, its just what happened in her life. I just wish i could have done more to keep her off drugs, but i guess it wasnt part of gods plan, or maybe i really did let her down by loving her and caring too much which eventually drove her away,

Think about it though, Romans had public baths, meaning, public nudity was common. they were pretty bi. (saturnalia, anyone?) now take a look at the early 1900's. when it was unheard of to see a woman's knees in public. how many people were gay then? i imagine not may because sexual imagery wasn't shoved down their throats 24/7.

for the past few decades sex has become a selling tool, and if you look at an image long enough you will want it, be it a half naked abercrombie dude or some naked chick showering and trying to push some pantine pro-v.

a much more interesting question and, imo a MUCH more valid one to be asking is a comparison to homosexuality rates as compared to the availability of sexual imagery throughout time.

has anyone ever seen a gay animal?


[edit on 26-12-2008 by drsmooth23]


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 12:13 AM by DantesLost
I would like to thank everyone who has replied so far.

My reason for starting this thread is because i have never understood how some people can say that being gay is a choice,but then say that they didn't choose their own sexuality.

I've also never understood the argument mentioned by paperplanes,'you might not choose to be gay,but you can choose to act on it or not.' What difference does that make? I'll still be gay.I'll still find women attractive.I'll still daydream about finding that special someone and spending the rest of my life with her....what? I'm a hopeless romantic.lol.



jd140


"I thank God Almighty for titties and beer".


As do all lesbians who like to have a drink.lol.



kyred


I have a gay sister and a gay daughter. It just seemed natural to me that they were gay. But I suppose that at some point they did have to choose between being the "norm" and accepting their feelings. I am not saying they chose to become gay, but that they chose to accept they were not the norm.


Usually happens when living a lie becomes too painful and depressing.




meaguire


I would like to add, that the term 'lifestyle' is an often used term aswell. Do heterosexuals have the monopoly on 'lifestyles' and homosexuals only have one 'lifestyle'? gay?


Good question.
And what actually is a 'gay lifestyle?'




Grock


Thousands of years ago when i decided to be what i was born to be by spiritual choice.


And this isn't the case for homosexuals?
Having learnt about the Berdache tradition,I would disagree.


I feel a little bad that some are confused in such a critical time (id spend this time a little more wisely than having my sexual urges determine my actions)....

You have sooooooo much more on your plate right now than to be sidetracked by your banal urges...


Amazing how it always comes down to the physical.What of the emotional and the intellectual,why are those always ignored? And would you call falling in love banal?



reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 12:44 AM by drsmooth23
reply to post by paperplanes



Sorry i didn't not mean to bastardize your statement with all that, im just trying to say, that heterosexuality is indeed, the default.

as far as population control goes, im all for that, haha.

only one time have i ever seen a guy dog humping another guy dog, but in his defense he was partially blind, and that dog really liked humping, and who can blame him for that

my main point remains that sexuality has become much more complicated than evolution, and/or the instigator of it could have ever imagined. I like to play the blame game because it is pretty easy, and most media is pretty sexy....

'to each his/her own.'

[edit on 26-12-2008 by drsmooth23]

[edit on 26-12-2008 by drsmooth23]


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 12:57 AM by Grock
reply to post by DantesLost




your last reply was a cop out.

"Amazing how it always comes down to the physical.What of the emotional and the intellectual,why are those always ignored? And would you call falling in love banal?"


As a highly regarded shaman/monk - yes i would.

Did you know that less that half the people in this world truelly fall in love with their soul mate?

Sex as a determining factor for my actions (love transcends btw) is so 4th grade.

Why get stuck on 4th grade when you could be at 12th or higher?

That cop out will get you stuck on levels that many of have trancended years ago.

(you bring up LOVE as your defense - let me ask you this: what is love?)

i bet you dont have an empowering answer...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^