What did Larry Silverstein mean by "Pull It"?, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 12-2-2009 @ 05:01 PM by Griff
Originally posted by adam_zapple
Thermite is not an explosive...what's this "nano-thermite sol-gel" you speak of?


www.abovetopsecret.com... - Brief description

en.wikipedia.org... - Sol-gel

Here's a nice paper to read.

Aero-Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nanoporous Iron-Oxide
Particles: A Potential Oxidizer for Nanoenergetic
Materials
Anand Prakash, Alon V. McCormick, and Michael R. Zachariah*
Departments of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Received August 8, 2003. Revised Manuscript Received January 22, 2004


There has been an increased research effort toward
use of nano-aluminum in explosives.1-


However, the nature of the sol-gel derived iron oxide
is unique because of its highly porous nature and may
afford the opportunity to infuse that material with
organics, which would lead to much higher pressurization
rates resulting from gas expansion. It is necessary
to caution the reader that these nanothermite reactions
of aluminum and metal oxides are extremely energetic.
Reactions can be very explosive
in the case of a few other
oxidizers such as CuO and MoO3;


www.enme.umd.edu...


reply posted on 12-2-2009 @ 10:04 PM by MrRandomGuy
My apologies if this is already posted.

Wikipedia gives an answer to this one.

en.wikipedia.org...

"We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it". "They made that decision to pull", he recalled, "and we watched the building collapse." Some proponents of the controlled demolition hypothesis have taken the remark as a confession that he ordered the building to be demolished.[43] Silverstein issued a statement that rejects this interpretation, asserting that it was the firefighting team, not the building, that was to be pulled.


It's possible he's lying, but it's equally possible he's telling the truth and mistakenly used the wrong term in the wrong situation.


reply posted on 13-2-2009 @ 12:47 PM by rush969
reply to post by Griff



I don´t see the point in “spinning” the phrases of Mr. S. so much.
Why don´t you try to analyze the other things that I mention in my post?
Don´t you agree with the logic that I present?



reply posted on 13-2-2009 @ 02:33 PM by Griff
reply to post by rush969



Like I said before.

It's very likely that Silverstein was trying to use proper English. He just did it improperly.

I still feel that he was trying to grandiose himself by implying (lying) that he was the one who suggested to remove the firefighters though.


reply posted on 13-2-2009 @ 05:57 PM by rush969
reply to post by Griff




Finally!!! I´m glad to say, I agree with you.
Yes, I agree he is probably trying to “look good” for the interview. And he is telling the story “his way”. I don´t think that makes him a liar or an assassin though.
And I understand that you also agree that what he meant was to “pull the team out” right?
What he is implying really is that he accepted the decision by chief Nigro or agreed with it don´t you think?


[edit on 13-2-2009 by rush969]


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 12:08 PM by Insolubrious
Originally posted by rush969
reply to
post by Griff




Finally!!! I´m glad to say, I agree with you.
Yes, I agree he is probably trying to “look good” for the interview. And he is telling the story “his way”. I don´t think that makes him a liar or an assassin though.
And I understand that you also agree that what he meant was to “pull the team out” right?
What he is implying really is that he accepted the decision by chief Nigro or agreed with it don´t you think?


[edit on 13-2-2009 by rush969]


Larry meant they pulled the building, simple as that. You don't refer to firefighters as 'it'. That's considered very rude, especially from an educated man like Larry. And I am sure Larry didn't mean to be rude about his dodgy contacts.

[edit on 16-2-2009 by Insolubrious]


reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 03:08 PM by rush969
reply to post by Insolubrious



He is not reffering to people. He meant "the team" pull it out. Besides, it has been shown he wasn´t the one who decided anything.

But now that you mention it, please explain:
How would you "pull" a 47 story skyscraper?
And also, how would you manage that when it is under fire?
THANKS.




reply posted on 16-2-2009 @ 04:36 PM by pteridine
reply to post by verbal_assassin



Why do you think pull means demolition? Did you read that somewhere or do you have experience in this area? "Pull" is often printed on doors and most of them are undemolished even though they open and close frequently.
I think Larry was talking big and wanted to use fireman talk for the media so he could be cool, too. The firechief said that he meant the team or rescue effort. "Pull it" in firespeak must mean "run for it before you are roasted."
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags