What did Larry Silverstein mean by "Pull It"?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times
Topic started on 12-12-2008 @ 01:05 PM by ashamedamerican
I'm so tired of official story parrots claiming things like "Larry Silverstein meant pull the firefighters out of the building" that I have decided to put this one to rest once and for all.
I could have spent even more time debunking this 'debunk attempt' but it's not worth the time of energy it would require because it's simply nonsense and is painfully clear that this is absolutely false.

First of all...
The Larry Silverstein "pull it" quote comes from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds" and the argument that “pull” is not used to mean “demolish” a building is belied by the other footage in the PBS documentary.

According to FEMA, NIST, and Frank Fellini, the Assistant Chief responsible for WTC 7 at that time, there weren’t any firefighters in the building.
Second of all the term "pull" IS industry terminology for demolishing a building that was used long before 9/11.

Here is Stacey Loizeaux who has worked for Controlled Demolition Inc. since the age of fifteen, her father, Mark Loizeaux, and her uncle, Doug Loizeaux are president and vice-president of the company.

In this interview she uses the term "pull" no less than four times, directly and obviously talking about building demolition.
PBS NOVA Interview with Stacey Loizeaux

Here is another link proving that "pull" is an industry term used even prior to 911.
Was the term "PULL IT" and industry term prior to 9/11 ?



The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein’s statement is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7. Dr. Shyam Sunder, of the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST), which investigated the collapse of WTC 7, is quoted in Popular Mechanics (Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report, March, 2005) as saying: “There was no firefighting in WTC 7”. The FEMA report on the collapses, from May, 2002, also says about the WTC 7 collapse: “no manual firefighting operations were taken by FDNY”.

Source: What did Larry Silverstein mean by "pull it"?

So now that the "kai bosh" has been put down on this one, let's move on to more important things, shall we?


[edit on 12-12-2008 by ashamedamerican]


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 01:10 PM by theindependentjournal
reply to post by ashamedamerican



I wonder how much trouble Silverstein got into for letting this slip out? He aint the only one, Rumsfeld said in an interview that a Missile hit the Pentagon...

Chief of Fire and Safety of NY that morning said there was BOMBS IN THE BUILDING...

Every reporter that morning, including the Fox News guy, said they heard explosions going off...

A college in Mass. recorded 3 distinct explosions before the Towers fell, each one and their seismographs have been public.

And now with the NIST saying that building 7 fell as if it had no foundation, I think the Silverstein comment makes the case...

Demolition of a building is always started at the foundation so it will drop in it's footprint, as all the buildings did that day, but no buildings before that day ever had.

Good Post!


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 02:37 PM by Jkd Up
reply to post by ashamedamerican



As someone who knows a few people in demolition, I asked them the same thing they all smiled and knew what I was talking about.

To "pull" a building is to "pull it down" or use detonation.

In laymen's terms: "Pull it" means detonate the placed charges.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 02:46 PM by ashamedamerican

That is the video.

Mr Silverstein was talking to the fire commander.
Neither the fire commander or Mr Silverstein is in the demolition business.

You're right they aren't, but it's such a commonly used tern in the industry that even the firefighters, and lease holders of large buildings know it.

Are you implying that the NYFD rigged the building with explosives and then detonated it?
If not, who rigged the building and who detonated it?

Did I say that the NYFD rigged and detonated the building?
They "made the decision" to pull it, which is also a lie because it had to have been rigged prior to this, you can't rig a building with demolition charges on the whim of a fire commander and pull that building on the same day, these things take time.
Who DID rig it? well now, that is the big question isn't it?


If Mr Silverstein was involved why would he say so on TV?

He made that statement on a PBS documentary called "America Rebuilds," and as to why he made the statement to begin with, I tend to lean towards: Because he was too stupid to realize what he was saying at the time, but who knows for sure.

The point is that if you read the information I provided it becomes clear that there weren't even any firefighters in the building. So the BS debunk attempt that claims they were referring to firefighters as "it" is obviously nonsense and a 'last ditch attempt' of official story parrots to use any tactic no matter how ridiculous to desperately cling onto the lies that the government sold them

Don't take my word for it, research it yourself and you will see.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 02:49 PM by ashamedamerican
Originally posted by Jkd Up
reply to
post by ashamedamerican



As someone who knows a few people in demolition, I asked them the same thing they all smiled and knew what I was talking about.

To "pull" a building is to "pull it down" or use detonation.

In laymen's terms: "Pull it" means detonate the placed charges.

I understand it means to use demolition to bring a building down.
Which is why I'm laying this one to rest, it's ridiculous and absurd and it's time for this BS claim to die.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 02:52 PM by Wildbob77
Here is an email from Chief Daniel Nigro, the fire commander in charge of building 7.



Regarding WTC 7: The long-awaited US Government NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) report on the collapse of WTC 7 is due to be published at the end of this year (although it has been delayed already a few times [ adding fuel to the conspiracy theorists fires!]). That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. Early on the afternoon of September 11th 2001, following the collapse of WTC 1 & 2, I feared a collapse of WTC 7 (as did many on my staff).

The reasons are as follows:

1 - Although prior to that day high-rise structures had never collapsed, The collapse of WTC 1 & 2 showed that certain high-rise structures subjected to damage from impact and from fire will collapse.

2. The collapse of WTC 1 damaged portions of the lower floors of WTC 7.

3. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels.

4. numerous fires on many floors of WTC 7 burned without sufficient water supply to attack them.

For these reasons I made the decision (without consulting the owner, the mayor or anyone else - as ranking fire officer, that decision was my responsibility) to clear a collapse zone surrounding the building and to stop all activity within that zone. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.

Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.

Regards, Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY (retired)

He pulled his men back about three hours before the collapse because he as the ranking fireman was worried about collapse.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:16 PM by cashlink
reply to post by Wildbob77



Well, with Mr. Silverstein “lying,” Chief Daniel Nigro “lying,” to cover their behinds, who needs terrorist! They are probably part of the plot of bring down all the WTC. Once proven a lair (always a lair).


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:20 PM by Wildbob77
Originally posted by cashlink
reply to
post by Wildbob77



Well, with Mr. Silverstein “lying,” Chief Daniel Nigro “lying,” to cover their behinds, who needs terrorist! They are probably part of the plot of bring down all the WTC.


So you now believe that the NYFD was involved.

I think that is rubbish.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:24 PM by cashlink
reply to post by pinch



To believe that Silverstein is an honest man and would not ever lie when he mad a Freudian slip, is really the absolute zenith, of absurdity, and hilariousness.

But, we've come to expect that from the Pseudo skeptics, so full speed ahead!





[edit on 12/12/2008 by cashlink]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags