Evidence that NASA is altering the true colours of the pictures of Mars, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:29 AM by RFBurns
reply to post by Deaf Alien



That is exactly correct! I simply adjusted the colors so that the white areas are white.

Even DeafAlien's image post of NASA's press conference shows a blue sky with white clouds in it and a brownish/redish ground. I didnt adjust that picture.




Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:31 AM by RFBurns
reply to post by Deaf Alien



Yep, but the red color reference on the color chart is darker than the red dust, you can still see the red color reference through the lighter red dust.



Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:34 AM by LSDeviant
Here's another one from redice:





I also saw on, I believe, Richard Hoagland's site an image of a NASA briefing room with a Mars image from the rover with blue sky, and then an image of the same room with the same image "redded" up. I'll try to find it, because it gave stunning evidence they altered the image, one way or the other...


Edit; no luck with the image yet, but here's a link to RCH's blog entry dealing with Mars color-alteration...Linky

[edit on 11-12-2008 by LSDeviant]


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:36 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by paperplanes



No problem. That's what we are here for and what ATS is for


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:40 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by RFBurns




Yep, but the red color reference on the color chart is darker than the red dust, you can still see the red color reference through the lighter red dust.

You are right

Why would the NASA show that picture at the press release conference and not do the correct adjustments on the rest of the images?

Also, I notice that there are some green color on the ground in your first adjusted photo.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:43 AM by RFBurns
reply to post by LSDeviant



Yep, from the Viking probe. Thats another good example of the image saturation changes being done to the images before we see them.

When that image was taken, and many others, the public did not have PC's and image programs to be able to put the images back to what they should be, but see for some reason NASA thinks that we dont know basic image white balance techniques.

White is white. And on a clear day with no wind or red dust being kicked up, white is white. All the other colors of stuff will fall into place accordingly once you achive the white balance.



Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:46 AM by RFBurns
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to
post by RFBurns




Yep, but the red color reference on the color chart is darker than the red dust, you can still see the red color reference through the lighter red dust.

You are right

Why would the NASA show that picture at the press release conference and not do the correct adjustments on the rest of the images?

Also, I notice that there are some green color on the ground in your first adjusted photo.


I believe that it is the "drip drip" admittance by NASA and is why they let that image at the press conference go through and all the others are still saturated with red. The sunset image I posted the link to earlier is another example of the drip drip. That image is right on the NASA website and in it you can see the blue color in the sunlight, the gradual change to a lighter blue and red the further away from the light source, and then the darker area of the sky, just like it does here on Earth during a sunset.



Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:47 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by RFBurns




When that image was taken, and many others, the public did not have PC's and image programs to be able to put the images back to what they should be, but see for some reason NASA thinks that we dont know basic image white balance techniques.




They will need to change their tactics.

Oh wait! Don't let them know we are on to them! Let them think we are dumb still.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:52 AM by RFBurns
reply to post by Deaf Alien



LOL!! Ya we cant tip our hand too quickly or they will stop publishing all these red saturated images and only release 256 grey scale black and white images!!



Cheers!!!!



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 07:54 AM by Deaf Alien
Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to
post by Deaf Alien



LOL!! Ya we cant tip our hand too quickly or they will stop publishing all these red saturated images and only release 256 grey scale black and white images!!


Oh gosh. I burst out in laughter when I read this. Thanks for the laugh!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 08:01 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by Fatality




So could it be possible that the air is actually breathable on Mars?

That could be closer to the truth than what NASA's letting on. Questions like that probably make them nervous.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 08:05 AM by RFBurns
Originally posted by Fatality
So could it be possible that the air is actually breathable on Mars?


Well thats a good question! I really cant say for sure, but you know that the Mars Global Surveyor probe has confirmed that the temperatures near the surface during the Martian summers are around 30 degrees F or more.

MGS surface temperatures

Thats plenty warm with the pressures on Mars for any water beneath the dust layer to come up, evaporate and go into the atmosphere. I am just postulating, but I would bet that within that 5 or 10 feet above the surface where it is warm enough to cause liquid water, that ther may be a layer below that 10 foot level of breathable atmosphere.

Deaf Alien noticed the "green stuff" in one of the images. That could be small plant life or alge of some sort. MSL will give us more detail of that when it gets to Mars, that is if it ever gets to Mars. The mission has been delayed until 2011!!!



Cheers!!!!

[edit on 11-12-2008 by RFBurns]


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 08:29 AM by Deaf Alien
reply to post by Montana



I have read that thread before. It still doesn't explain why the NASA released the picture of Mars with blue sky at press release conference.

But thanks for the thread. I'm bookmarking it for further study.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 08:38 AM by midnightbrigade
reply to post by prevenge



Depends on what kind of colorblind he is. I have a friend who can see colors fine but is "shade" blind. It's odd. By the way, that friend is a paint and autobody professional, and he always matches the colors just fine...most times even better than someone with "normal" vision...because he sees things "normal" doesn't

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Zombie Apocalypse is Real! And it\'s Here Now!
  Posted 15 days ago with 86 member flags
While Americans keep arguing about Trayvon-Zimmerman
  Posted 8 days ago with 79 member flags
The Suspicious Death of MI6 Agent Gareth Williams..
  Posted 18 days ago with 77 member flags
Faked Moon Landing - Amazing Documentary
  Posted 10 days ago with 58 member flags
This is scary!
  Posted 15 days ago with 57 member flags