reply to post by Mercenary2007
Comrad "Mercenary2007" wow, you have a long list to reply to.
Soon I'll put a whole bunch of videos on YouTube, and I'll have incredible stuff on earthquakes there for everyone all over the world to study.
I don't live in Wichita, but I am in the Central USA right now. I have studied the New Madrid fault some, and wasn't too impressed by the area,
lots of snakes everywhere you go, and I don't like snakes crawling around.
I was in New Madrid several years ago and was watching a mere 1.5 magnitude earthquake four days before it struck. The seismic system started
detecting it about 20 miles from its epicenter. While I was there, I made another GREAT discovery, and that discovery was that it gives off radiation
that can be seen if you are using the right equipment; fortunately I had that equipment with me on that trip. Unfortunately for me I was hoping to
study a much larger earthquake, but that one gave me that great discovery, so I just stuck with it.
The New Madrid fault is where some great earthquakes struck in the NEAR PAST and San Andreas fault is where a shearing effect is taking place in
California. Basically everything to the West of the San Andreas fault is moving Northward around the Pacific Plate which is much denser/heavier.
As to the earthquakes that have taken place in the other states that you mention, those earthquakes are simply releasing pressure there in those
states. The problem is that all of you out there think that those are the only earthquakes in those states, and in fact they are not the only
earthquakes taking place in those states. They are in fact called Common Earthquakes, but if you look up "slow earthquakes" or "silent
earthquakes" which most of you don't realize exist, then you will realize that you are missing out on earthquakes that aren't reported because
others don't have the equipment to detect them. They know they exist, but they can't prove it. On the other hand, my equipment proves they exist
and that they show the Earths surface movement.
In other words there are two types of earthquakes, common earthquakes and silent earthquakes. Both of these slowly are moving the surface of the
Earth here in the USA to the West, and then along the West Coast it is moving northward and it can all be tracked as in a chain reaction. An
earthquake strikes, or an earthquake cell releases its pressure and boom pressure becomes detectable to the west somewhere, and it just keeps moving
west. Sometimes it moves west and then south, and then north along the Pacific Ocean.
SO.. those earthquakes that have occurred that you pointed out don't really mean anything.
Others won't go out on the limb, simply because they don't have the equipment or the knowledge. I'm not going out on the limb because I know my
equipment and I know what its telling me, and its telling me there is nothing out there to worry about in the central USA in the next 3 days that
could be a 6.0 or greater in magnitude. It is all pure science, even children can understand it. There is a 100% chance that there will be "NO"
6.0 or greater earthquake in the area between Memphis-Denver, and Dallas-Pierre in the next 3 days. That is the scientific fact, using scientific
instruments.
The New Madrid fault isn't that active right now. If you want to see active then go to the USGS site for the USA and then look down at the small map
showing Puerto Rico; now that is what I call active, and I'd bet a nice sized earthquake measuring above 5.0 will strike there soon with all that
activity, and I'm sure you would make that assumption to, just by looking at the map with all of the earthquakes.
3D models of earthquakes near the New Madrid fault are worthless in predicting earthquakes.
I don't care how much research you have done on earthquakes, and I don't even care if you are a Seismologist, your work is worthless, and I mean it
is worthless, unless you have the scientific equipment that can get you scientific answers. I know that you don't have the scientific equipment or
the knowledge or you would know that what I write is all the truth, and you would be backing me up. But I don't need people to back me up, all I
need is the nice beautiful scientific equipment that I use.
Your a good person Mercenary2007, and in the future you will be shocked at the amount of collectable data that a fault gives off that is under
pressure. If you want to start studying earthquake faults, my best suggestion to you is to go out to the biggest dam nearby that is holding back a
lot of pressure, and start studying it. A dam, is a man made fault and you can easily study it, and that is kind of where I started.
A large dam is just like a small earthquake. You may have to stay there a month or more, and look for the seismic cycle, a commom rythm coming from
the dam itself. It is a fault, just like any other fault that will quake. It has abnormal pressure exerted on one side, that is what all faults have
that quake. It will be pulsing faster than normal earthquakes, but it will be pulsing. Furthermore, when you get the right type of equipment to
detect radiation you will be able to see the dam from miles away if it is big enough, and I'm talking through hillsides, mountains and through the
walls of your house; just like you will be able to see any other fault under abnormal pressure. The bigger the magnitude, the farther away you will
be able to see it from, through almost anything, depending on the strength or magnitude of the fault under abnormal pressure.
The problem with people that want to study earthquakes is that they think they need to be in an area where there are many earthquakes, when in fact
they should start off small where there are earthquakes that occur rarely, so that when one does strike, you can see the difference it makes, no
matter how small the magnitude. If they start off studying earthquakes in an area where there are many earthquakes, then all the pulses are confusing
and they can't or won't understand what all the pulsing is all about; one area will look just like another, when in fact you are detecting a
completely different earthquake.
