It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by NavalFC
A well as the fact that hydrocephallus explains all of the skulls unique features.
So hydrocephallus can produce uniformly thick skulls that are nearly perfectly symmetrical?
It can produce skulls that are lighter and stronger than normal skulls, with different fibre compositions?
It can produce skulls with larger inner ears and smaller sinuses?
Go ahead, supply me with the link that states that hydrocephallus can account for ALL of the starchild skull's unusual qualities...
The skull is abnormal in several aspects. A dentist determined, based on examination of the upper right maxilla found with the skull, that it was a child's skull, 4.5 to 5 years in age.[4] However, the volume of the interior of the starchild skull is 1600 cubic centimeters, which is 200 cm³ larger than the average adult's brain, and 400 cm³ larger than an adult of the same approximate size. The orbits are oval and shallow, with the optic nerve canal situated at the bottom of the orbit instead of at the back. There are no frontal sinuses.[3] The back of the skull is flattened, but not by artificial means. The skull consists of calcium hydroxyapatite, the normal material of mammalian bone.[5] Carbon 14 dating was performed twice, the first on the normal human skull at the University of California at Riverside in 1999, and on the Starchild skull in 2004 at Beta Analytic in Miami, the largest radiocarbon dating laboratory in the world. Both independent tests gave a result of 900 years ± 40 years since death. [6] DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD, a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes".[7] BOLD was unable to extract any DNA from the maxilla.[6] Further DNA testing at Trace Genetics, which unlike BOLD specializes in extracting DNA from ancient samples, in 2003 recovered mitochondrial DNA though it was not the child of the skull found with it. Its mother did belong to a known Native American haplogroup, haplogroup C. However, useful lengths of nuclear DNA or Y-chromosomal DNA for further testing have not yet been recovered. [8] Later testing in 2004 at the Royal Holloway college of the University of London revealed unexplained "fibers" in the bone of the skull and a reddish residue in the cancellous bone, neither of which are known or recorded to exist prior to the discovery.[9] Explanations from the skull's unusual features include the use of cradle boarding on a hydrocephalic child,[10] brachycephaly, Crouzon syndrome,[11] and progeria.
Originally posted by cruzion
Supply us with links that say that hydrocephallus can't produce these qualities (starchild and affiliate sites excluded, of course).
6:1-4 Now it came to pass, awhen men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, 2 that the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves of all whom they chose.
3 And the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh; yet his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” 4 There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
Originally posted by NavalFC
Aeons and Mind in the universe your grasping at straws, and Aeons you dont seem to understand what happened
HUMAN X AND HUMAN Y chomosome were both found. That is definitive, it means, beyond a shadow of a doubt that this person was a human male with a human mother and father. Their were no un explained chromosomes
A well as the fact that hydrocephallus explains all of the skulls unique features.
you can post all the news artiles about genetic manipulation you want the fact is their isnt A SINGLE CINTILLA of evidence to suggest that this occured in this case.
Now you 2 are just being silly, refusing to see the evidence....
the same thing proponents often accuse skeptics of! How ironic!
Originally posted by mind is the universe
Originally posted by NavalFC
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by NavalFC
However fermi's paradox also calls into question why they havent colonized the entire galaxy yet
How do you know that 'they' haven't?
Humans have colonised Earth, so at least this particular part in the Galactic rim IS colonised.
You assume so much in your posts, NavalFC, when you really don't know much at all.
No we did not colonize Earth. Earth is our HOME.
You don't know that. It's premature and silly thing to say. We actually don't know that. Darwin's theory is duh a theory.
In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanation for our observations.2 It ties together all the facts about something, providing an explanation that fits all the observations and can be used to make predictions. In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation. It's as close to proven as anything in science can be.
As a species we have only been inhabitating this planet for 100,000 at most. The universe is speculated to be more thatn 15billion years old. Open your mind, your brain isn't going to fall out if you just try and think bigger.
In a real sense we are not from earth, life came to earth. So either way your really woefully wrong.
Naval you also need to calm down, your going to do yourself a turn.
But on topic, People should not buy into this starchild nonsenese until there is more evidence. Only in America people Only in America. People will do anything to make money.
Originally posted by cruzion
reply to post by tezzajw
Glass houses and throwing stones!
What evidence would you like to see?
If you define what it is you really want, maybe we can stop going around in circles.
I doubt that it will matter what evidence we get, it will somehow never be enough.
My ramblings were a floppy, limp and shrivelled pink attempt at satire.
You had come to the conclusion that all the scientists that had ever worked on the problem of abiogenesis and evolution and paelentology and a whole host of other branches of science, were not quite convincing enough. Apparently none of it is proof enough for you.
I took it to the next level where the limitations of the solipsist nature of our conciousness - the subjective interpretation of an external world, was a limiting factor in proving anything definitively.
Kind of silly I know, but then, so is dismissing the work of thousands of people who have put time and hard work into trying solve these problems.
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by Aeons
No Aeon, if this was a hybrid it would not have both the X and Y. From your post it seems as if you dont quite understand how the whole X Y thing works and what exactly it means..
the fact that the X and Y were found means it this child had the whole compliment of human DNA, from the father and mother.
If this were a "Hybrid" this would not be the case.
you dont just get a X and Y chromosome and throw them together in a lab to make a hybrid.. doesnt work that way.
each person in human redproduction contributes 23 chromosomes for a grand total of 46 out of the 23 pairs
Also the fact that as I have said there is nothing about the skull, or the biological testing thats been done, that suggests in anyway that this is anything other then a human skull.