It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apex
Those are some nice photos. But I can't help but feel that Rainier looks nicer than the clouds really.
Of course, that might just be me but I can't help but feel that Stratovolcanoes look really cool.
Mount Rainier was selected as a Decade Volcano because of the hazard it poses to surrounding, highly populated areas, especially the Seattle-Tacoma metropolitan area. Mount Rainier has an extensive cover of snow and ice, which, if melted rapidly , could produce catastrophic floods and mudflows. The volcano has an extensive but poorly studied geological record of activity including lava flows, ash eruptions, avalanches, and mudflows. While it has had no significant historic eruptions, minor ones did occur in the mid 1800s, and dozens of lahars are known to have occurred in the last 5,000 years. Some of these lahar deposits are quite massive and extend into the populated Puget Sound lowlands. Because urban development of Mount Rainier's flanks and nearby valleys is still in early stages compared to many volcanos, we have a chance to mitigate the volcanic hazards through appropriate land use.
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
yeah, I've lived in this area for 30 years. I know that if the big rainer explosion does happen theres a good chance of a huge lahar nailing tacoma. But come on, the odds of it happening in my lifetime are a zillion to one. Dozens of lahars in 5000 years doesn't worry me in the least.
We all know its active. we all talked about it as kids. We all know how incredible it can be(ex. st helens). But come on, you really think anyone here is the least bit worried?
And here is a very good site with photos of clouds made by "The Cloud Appreciation Society".