Originally posted by shidge.
Its def. a photoshopped picture.
And, besides, if it wasnt.. Wouldnt we have already seen it plastered all over CNN ?
I agree it's a photoshopped picture. You can tell by the outline of the men’s shirts, especially the man at the bottom of the page—that and they
don’t have the right coloring to blend in with the environment. The shirt’s edge should blur as much as the bones blur into the ground. They don’t.
That’s easier to see without it being quite so blown up.
No, we wouldn't see it all over CNN.
Think about this clearly: We live in a society that perpetuates the myth of LUCY being an ancestor to humanity. (It was in my college textbook 2
years ago, and that was debunked sometime mid 70's to mid 80’s BY THE DISCOVERERS. 1.)Neanderthals buried in the same area, and some date MUCH
older. 2.)The upright stance was impossible by the wear-and-tear of the bones. 3.) The dentals were well within range of a huge Gibbon. ) I’m no
going to say that EVOLUTION is false, but some people so fear evolution being debunked that they are willing to hide evidence that may be contrary to
its perpetuation. Don’t worry; I know some Creationists do the same. (I’m still waiting for someone to explain how the law of Biogenesis works WITH
evolution—since they’re rather contrary in belief.)
Anyway: the whole idea behind many of those who would hide this is that man has been becoming larger as we evolve. Creationists, for the most part,
say we were eclectic and there’s a wide range in each generation, and as we de-evolve, we average more in height, because the gene pool is
related—breeding to the end of a kind. Now, with the improvement of diet and growth hormones, our nation has grown a few inches, overall we have
gotten a FEW INCHES taller. Now, if man were truly eclectic, we’d see wide ranges of size (not as big as this photo, but maybe 12 ft tall down to 3
ft. tall--proportional). We still have pygmies and dwarves, but what about giants? There’s usually a little truth in myth: We have legends of
giants. Why aren’t there 12 ft giants now? The legends say we often slew them to prove our manliness. The short 5-6 ft tall halflings ganged up on
them. So, if there’s a skeleton of a 12 ft. tall person out there, those who don’t want creationism believed by the masses will hide, destroy, lie,
cheat, and even MURDER over it.
From what I remember, there was a 12 ft. tall Indian, in full dress, buried in one of the Indian mounds. The Smithsonian bought it, about a hundred
years ago. It’s never been seen since. (Again, I think its Dr. Bert Thompson with the documents; I will have to look them up.)
Why would they want to hide it? Think about it. If the God of the Bible is true, and the Bible is his word, then maybe there are some consequences
for our actions. For our conscience’s sake, it better not be true. Early evolutionists used to hunt down Australian Aborigines and MURDER THEM for
their bones, to have displays on PRIMATIVE MAN. Come on, people, the complete title of Darwin’s book was: The Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life
That’s rather racist. So, evolution is just an excuse for racism?
I’m not saying that; I just find it sad that early on, they often went hand in hand, and some people still use it to be supremacists.
This is just one line of thinking; there are others as to why this has been suppressed in the past. This is just the line of thinking that upsets
To the freedom of suppression!