It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eight bits
adjensen
To write a "Gnostic gospel," you need only spin a novel in which a wandering rabbi named Jesus spouts what Gnostic teachers had been saying for centuries. Throw in a little local color, Judean and Galilean place names, and disciple characters with disciple names - and we're done. Oh, yeah, catchy title. [ Acts, Gospel, ... ] of [ Peter, Mary, Andrew, ... ].
You have no idea what you are talking about. The Gnostic Gospels were written at the same time as the 'canonical Gospels' or better said 'the biblical' Gospels. Stop pretending you know better.
Originally posted by gnostician
You have no idea what you are talking about. The Gnostic Gospels were written at the same time as the 'canonical Gospels' or better said 'the biblical' Gospels.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by adjensen
All you need to do then, is post some links to back up your claims.
Let's take a look at how solid that evidence is.
Originally posted by poet1b
The whole time scale of measuring our years as BC and AD wasn't even developed until around the 8th century, if memory serves me right, which is why your claims of when this was written and that was written is all based on very loose theory.
Lastly, your sources are every bit as biased and weak as those you ridicule among the Gnostics. How many of them believe in Creationism?
Originally posted by poet1b
There might have even been deliberate intention to deceive, and that is the most likely reality.
These scholars you want to put on a pedestal are often Christian scholars who aren't legitimate researchers, because they seek to prove what they have been taught, as a historical reality. While there are many legitimate researchers who doubt the very existence of Jesus Christ.
You have been knocking Gnosticism since you started posting on this thread, so don't try to claim different now.
Originally posted by ghaleon12
reply to post by adjensen
Gnostic Christianity didn't "run out of steam", it was more popular than anything else in early Christianity. The power of orthodoxy was given by Constantine to a select few, and many schools including philosophy schools were shut down.
Some of the Gnostic writers were said to have been taught by the apostles
Originally posted by poet1b
People with strong biases tend not be be good sources for research. I think we have already covered this.
I believe Dan Brown is a fiction writer, why do you keep trying to bring him into this conversation?
"The Bible is a product of man, my dear. Not of God. The Bible did not fall magically from the clouds. Man created it as a historical record of tumultuous times, and it has evolved through countless translations, additions, and revisions. History has never had a definitive version of the book...more than 80 gospels were considered for the New Testament, and yet only a relative few are chosen for inclusion-- Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John among them... the Bible, as we know it today, was collected by the pagan Roman emperor Constantine the Great."
-- Dan Brown, the Davinci Code
I thought we were here to explore "the Real Message of Christ", not try to put it in a box as you seem to want to do.
After all, this is a conspiracy sight where we discuss alternative theories and possibilities.
Originally posted by poet1b
It is your choice if you want to embrace the truth.
Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by NorEaster
There is a lot of truth in your post. The gnosis was never meant to be marketed to the masses like Christianity. The Concrete mind cannot grasp the true Gnosis of the Chirst fully so Christianity and other religions and esoteric disciplines and faiths Like in the east were crafted to stimulate the thinking of humanity to the possibilities. So when they reached the point in thier evolution where they could began to grasp the Gnosis and discover the intuitive mind and a make a connection to the soul or kingdom within and raise thier consciousness to a higher level of seeing and understanding etc.
Indeed it does appear as elitism to the concrete mind and of course the religions were co-opted and distorted for control purposes etc. However the gnosis of the Christ is available to all humanity and all will eventually come to knowledge of it when they are ready. It is not something that can just be taught and boom you know and understand. it is a struggle and it comes in increments as the aspirant claws his/her way up the mountain so to speak. IOW you have to have reached a point where you realise there is something more then the concrete mind conceives and seek to find it and really want to know. And you have periods of doubt and will abandon the quest many times thinking it is all BS till you resolve to focus on it till you find it. Then one day comes a paradigm shift and new vistas and ways of seeing things opens up that you never imagined. And then you know and realize this is only one of many more shifts in conciousness you will attain to
As the Ancient wisdom teaches "when the Student is ready the teacher will appear". Until one is ready they will sometimes ridicule those that have moved forward on the path so to speak. All are at their out point on the path and some are a little farther then others but none are any better or more elite then others all have the same potential and will progress in thier own time. This is what is meant by the straight and narrow path. No one else can walk your path or you theirs.
Gnosticism's Christian form grew to prominence in the 2nd century A.D. Ultimately denounced as heretical by the early church, Gnosticism proposed a revealed knowledge of God ("gnosis" meaning "knowledge" in Greek), held as a secret tradition of the apostles. In The Gnostic Gospels, author Elaine Pagels suggests that Christianity could have developed quite differently if Gnostic texts had become part of the Christian canon. Without a doubt: Gnosticism celebrates God as both Mother and Father, shows a very human Jesus's relationship to Mary Magdalene, suggests the Resurrection is better understood symbolically, and speaks to self-knowledge as the route to union with God. Pagels argues that Christian orthodoxy grew out of the political considerations of the day, serving to legitimize and consolidate early church leadership. Her contrast of that developing orthodoxy with Gnostic teachings presents an intriguing trajectory on a world faith as it "might have become." The Gnostic Gospels provides engaging reading for those seeking a broader perspective on the early development of Christianity. --F. Hall