Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 11:09 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by FlyersFan


Richardson would be a good change of pace. Heard about him during the primaries and he seems like a good guy. Hilary scares me still acting and dressing like a woman when it's clear... Anyways, more nightmares. And to the other posters, www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 11:12 AM by nyk537
reply to post by GamerGal


And your point?

That thread is just as ignorant and partisan as your posts here.

No wonder it's getting all that attention.



Anything constructive to add?


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 11:19 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by FlyersFan


John Kerry looks like Frankenstein's Monster, Clinton looks like a gargoyle and has more testosterone then Kerry lol. But I hope he does go for Richardson. Would he have any say on the border issues though? From a border state and of Hispanic descent... Where I live it doesn't affect me but it does affect America. Would he be more "We need to make them citizens so they pay taxes and are paid the same as the rest of Americans" or is he "Build a wall and keep them out."


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 11:35 AM by GamerGal
reply to post by grover


Like having Powell in as Sec. of Defense? Although he's not really the enemy just a former Republican. But I think my theory is why the GOP is calling for Gates to stay as SOD. That way they only need to kill five people to get a Republican back in the top spot. And people who say this is waaay out there, tell the Kennedies that. Every one who went against Nixon was shot. Tell RR that after a family friend of his VP shot him. The GOP NeoCons are power hungry and have no problem even killing their own President to seize power. Oh wait, talking about a conspiracy on a conspiracy board... How dare I right?



reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 02:44 PM by grover
reply to post by Sestias


Agreed... Ya don't want someone soft, warm or fuzzy for Sec. of State especially these days.


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 03:04 PM by grover
reply to post by MasterRegal


I don't know, Richardson has experience coming out of his ears. He was the UN ambassador for Clinton ya know.

[edit on 14-11-2008 by grover]


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 03:22 PM by MasterRegal
Originally posted by grover
reply to post by MasterRegal


I don't know, Richardson has experience coming out of his ears. He was the UN ambassador for Clinton ya know.

[edit on 14-11-2008 by grover]


I didn't say he did not have experience. He is Governor of New Mexico, was UN Ambassador, was Energy Secretary, and was a Congressman. He has all the experience in the world. He has negotiated with world leaders. It does not mean he is the best person for the job. If he is chosen, that's great, we have someone on the job or actually understands how to do the job. But, Richardson also proved himself to be pretty much an idiot on the campaign.


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 03:22 PM by antar
With the Presidential line of succession here is how Hillary will fall into the chances of her becoming President...
en.wikipedia.org...

I think that one of the reasons she has been chosen was from when she and Obama both went before the Bilderbergers meeting shortly before she lost to Obama.

Question is, why have they chosen her to represent the country as Secretary of State?

Just as we saw two successions of the Bush administration and their agendas, will we also see an continuation of the work former President Bill Clinton left behind as well? If so take a look at the past administration and the direction Hilary mat focus on as Secretary of State.

en.wikipedia.org...

An important read, very disturbing in that since the past 8 years, the conditions have fallen to pieces in the countries where the Clinton Administration worked to end suffering and bring peaceful military presence to these areas. We are far too spread out now to even consider using the same strategies, so where does this agenda pick up? And is Clinton the right choice to bring peace to the world through her diplomatic presence with her Husband at her side?





[edit on 14-11-2008 by antar]



reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 03:25 PM by MasterRegal
reply to post by antar


She was not even offered the job yet and why bring conspiracy into this news.


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 04:43 PM by TheRedneck
reply to post by grover

Actually, as I look back on ol' Bill's administration and the state of the country during that time, I realize that the things he did that really bothered me all have one of two things in common: Al Gore and/or the Hildebeast. Heck if he was divorced and able to run this last time, I would have campaigned for the guy.

Hillary scares me to no end. There was one time on the CB during the Clinton years when I heard someone asking if Hillary was the Anti-Christ. I answered him and said no, she was here to keep the Anti-Christ scared to show his face.
  • Hillary-Care
  • "It takes a village"
  • Manipulation of stock markets while simultaneously speaking out against such.
  • 'Illegal' possession of FBI records on her political opponents found in the White House.
  • Vince Foster (and others)
'Nuff said. She was there for all of them. Bill was sitting in the Oval Office with Monica, harming no one except that poor blue dress.

TheRedneck


reply posted on 14-11-2008 @ 05:28 PM by grover
reply to post by TheRedneck


Hillary never bothered me all that much... I was opposed to her running for president because I didn't think that there was a candidate out there that would so unite the right and divide the left as her and more importantly if she had gotten the nod and the election that would be 4 presidents in a row that was either a Bush or a Clinton and having so much power in the hands of two family bases is never good.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^