It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deadline527
I hate to say this, but I do not support gays raising children for a few reasons that some may or may not agree with. Mainly, because if homosexuals were supposed to raise children, nature would have provided them a way to procreate. To me, the simple fact that homosexuals, without the aid of science or adoption, by all means would never be able to raise children says a lot.
Also, in the event that they want to adopt a female. How are two gay men supposed to teach the little girl about a young woman's sexuality, changes, and differences without ever experiencing it themselves. I do not see two gay men teaching a ten year old girl about her period, how to properly use a tampon or pad, and other similar topics.
How are these children supposed to learn gender roles from a young age if being raised by two men? This would lead to a lot of confusion I would think when the child starts going to school. Children already have a hard enough time as it is trying to fit in, and this would only add to their problems. They would automatically be considered different, and children at that young of an age would not understand the situation.
Although, I am going to counter my own stance here real quick, and I will agree with what most of you have said that so many children are left orphans and could use a loving family, gay or straight, but morally to ME its wrong. I just think in a lot of situations, even as a orphan, being adopted by two gay men could possibly do more harm then good. We have not seen enough of these situations to determine if there is any lasting psychological effects, social effects, and so on. Only time will tell..
Everyone has different opinions, and I support everyone elses views, just as I would hope they support my right to an opinion. Sadly though, I myself do not think it is right for the reasons stated above.
I hate to say this, but I do not support gays raising children for a few reasons that some may or may not agree with. Mainly, because if homosexuals were supposed to raise children, nature would have provided them a way to procreate. To me, the simple fact that homosexuals, without the aid of science or adoption, by all means would never be able to raise children says a lot.
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to post by Wolf321
Normal is subjective. We all have our own definitions of normal.
Homosexuality is not abnormal; it occurs throughout nature in all kinds of animals....naturally. So, it occurs in humans naturally, too.
That isn't even the issue, though. The issue is denying rights to people who want children on the basis of their marital status (this initiative, specifically). The issue is denying rights to children who are unwanted by legislating who and what constitutes "proper" parents.
The issue is denying rights, when our country was founded with the basic principle of everyone being created equal.
It isn't fair and it isn't right. That's the bottom line....
Normal is not subjective, it is majority.
Why would you want to open the door for a child to be exposed to something most of society deems unacceptable.
Originally posted by deadline527
reply to post by rapinbatsisaltherage
Homosexuals have the ability to reproduce? Explain please...
If they reproduce with a female, then obviously that is not homosexual. Maybe its just me, but I have never seen two homosexual males able to carry a child from contriception until birth. Have you?
Originally posted by Aaron_Justin
reply to post by skeptic1
I am ok with unmarried people not getting to adopt. Think about how much trouble a single parent has. We have to think of the children's well being, not your selfish desires to have a child. People want a child so badly they are willing to overlook that.