Preemptive ATS Strategies For A Smooth Election Day(s), page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 12:42 AM by hypervigilant
reply to post by TheRedneck


As usual, I'm in agreement with The Redneck. He needs to get a star for the suggestion.


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 03:43 AM by americandingbat
reply to post by cognoscente



I wonder if the two separate threads idea was just because we apparently can't even discuss new (non-partisan) rules in effect for election day without bait being dropped and bitten.

I don't know, maybe a non-partisan thread could work, but I think the guidelines would have to be incredibly tight, and would have to include not biting as well as not baiting.

In that spirit, can I suggest two things?:

1) Dig out the best "how to be a good ATSer" threads and sticky them somewhere prominent (or somewheres - maybe links in the header ad space even)

2) Add (in boldface or colored text) a reminder to the new post and new thread pages that guidelines are extra stringent just for a couple days, please be absolutely sure you're not baiting or biting before hitting "post"


reply posted on 3-11-2008 @ 11:57 PM by schrodingers dog
reply to post by SkepticOverlord



SO, I'm just curious, are we now officially under the new rules?


reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 03:47 AM by JustMike
I'm in favour of having dedicated, "official" threads for what will be very high-volume discussions. But I have to agree with TheRedneck and those supporting his opinion. It seems very reasonable to have a "combined" thread as well as the two separate ones.

However, as the
ATS.com 2008 Presidential Poll results show 32% of all votes being for third-party candidates, why will there not be a special thread for "Third Party" results and discussions? Does this mean that, having obtained these Poll results, the opinions of almost one third of the ATS membership (who voted) are basically going to be ignored? Having no special thread for third party votes certainly implies that. I find that puzzling, especially as the "third party"choice received more votes than the McCain/Palin ticket!

As with virtually all U.S. Presidential elections, the outcome of this one is of great importance not only to Americans, but also to many people in other parts of the world. The United States of America has enormous influence in so many areas, and that's the main reason we are interested in the outcome. But besides the two main parties, having an insight into the votes the "third parties" obtain is also of interest as it helps us to better understand the way that U.S. citizens see things within their country from a political perspective. Frankly the U.S. has one of the best systems in the world for choosing its leaders: fixed terms (and a fixed number of terms), set voting days, a two-house legislature... Okay so it ain't perfect, but it's a lot better than many countries have (mine included). But as I said, it would be helpful for everyone, I think, to have a special thread for "third party" candidates and those who have an interest in them.

[edit on 4/11/08 by JustMike]



reply posted on 4-11-2008 @ 05:37 AM by CeltAngel
reply to post by infinite



Infinite, do you have a better link? The one you gave is not working :-(
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^