Obama is better choice for commander in chief, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 12:32 PM by pluckynoonez
reply to post by Solo954



"raned"? Is that a word?

Tis a choice: en.wikipedia.org...

I am going with Obama. He is less annoying.



reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 12:46 PM by deathhasnosound
reply to post by -zeropoint-


He wants to pull the troops out of Iraq (weakness)
He wants to sit down with the tyrant leader of Iran (weak)


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 12:53 PM by -zeropoint-
Originally posted by deathhasnosound
reply to
post by -zeropoint-


He wants to pull the troops out of Iraq (weakness)
He wants to sit down with the tyrant leader of Iran (weak)


Exactly as I thought, posting vague misconceptions and untruths, he has a plan to take the troops out responsibly and timely, it's not weak. You probably don't understand how much the war is costing America, and the lives being lost for this war on 'terra'. It's an argument that many people have made, but there's people like you who measure strengths and weaknesses by how many people you kill, and how many bad things occur in the world. I wish you were on the other side of the coin though, you'd be more useful to the world.

How is communication weak? You only have war and violence in your heart, when many middle-class and innocent people in America, "at home", are feeling the burdens of such negativity and economic collapse. Again, I wish your face was on the other side of the coin, you'd be much more useful and logical than you are now.


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 01:28 PM by nj2day
reply to post by deathhasnosound



Leaders can't show signs of weakness?

are you serious? I think the most effective leaders are ones with the balls to reflect on themselves, and be able to point out where their shortcomings are...

Any leader that can identify their own weaknesses, know which people to surround themselves with to compensate.


reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 01:34 PM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Solo954
Obama is better choice for commander in chief

Wrong.

www.youtube.com...

He pledged to destroy our defenses and wipe out future combat systems.

That's piss poor judgement .. piss poor planning .. and it's down right dangerous. With a democratic congress lead by that flake Pelosi, Obama will be able to do exactly what he promised in this video.

Destruction of our defenses. Destruction of our future defenses.
Massive unemployment. And couple that with his promise to
bankrupt the coal industry .... he's a nightmare for homeland security.

Be afraid. Be very afrad.

Commander in Chief? More like chief traitor.




reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 01:42 PM by Anonymous ATS




reply posted on 2-11-2008 @ 01:58 PM by Open_Minded Skeptic
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic



BH said it so eloquently I don't have much to add, but did want to say great find and great thread!

I am continually amazed at the equation of a willingness to engage in violence with strength and a willingness to choose other means of conflict resolution as weakness.

To quote a famous if fictional leader:

Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent


Salvor Hardin

S & F
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Fox News Drops The Ball On Its Focus Group - Ron Paul Supporters!
  Posted 14 days ago with 43 member flags
Obama Supporters...Remember This List When You Vote This Year.
  Posted 13 days ago with 35 member flags
26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying
  Posted 5 days ago with 27 member flags
What\'s With The Obama Love on ATS Today?
  Posted 16 days ago with 25 member flags
Obama and why he\'ll still be president...
  Posted 18 days ago with 24 member flags