It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cashlink
reply to post by SuperViking
Clearly looking at your – points that’s the kind of answer I would expect.
It is very clear you are trolling.
Have a nice day.
Originally posted by cashlink
reply to post by common-sense
My opinion is Osama had nothing to do with 911 and he has never been charged for the crime and the FBI said they do not have any proof that he did 911.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
He said he was going to do an attack and even said how the
deed would be done.
Unless it wasn't Osama but some figment of a set up.
Originally posted by SuperViking
What? So because they didn't rewrite the file on him and didn't change what he was initially wanted for, it's a conspiracy?
Originally posted by SuperViking
Umm...why should they update their webpage? Can you seriously tell us why?
Originally posted by SuperViking
That leap is laughable in nature, and leaps like that are why "truthers" are a laughingstock of educated and reasonable society.
Originally posted by SuperViking
This is why you're laughed at.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by SuperViking
What? So because they didn't rewrite the file on him and didn't change what he was initially wanted for, it's a conspiracy?
I never stated that, you did.
I merely pointed out that OBL is not wanted for the 9/11 attacks on the FBI website.
Originally posted by SuperViking
Umm...why should they update their webpage? Can you seriously tell us why?
You're kidding, right? You're asking why a Federal Agency should not have to update its webpages, based on new information? That's one of the silliest statements that I have read this past week.
Seriously, you have no idea at all about webpage protocols and professionalism.
Originally posted by SuperViking
That leap is laughable in nature, and leaps like that are why "truthers" are a laughingstock of educated and reasonable society.
You're supposed to work for the NSA, yet you can't understand why the FBI should maintain up-to-date webpages. I can see who does and doesn't belong to an 'educated society'.
Originally posted by SuperViking
This is why you're laughed at.
Look in the mirror, SuperViking.
Originally posted by SuperViking
You "merely" pointed it out? Really? Why did you persist in arguing when it was explained why to you?
Originally posted by SuperViking
He's wanted for various terrorist acts, in addition to his first ones that are mentioned.
Further, the FBI's jurisdiction is not overseas.
Lastly, even if he was you wouldn't accept it as proof of his culpability.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by SuperViking
He's wanted for various terrorist acts, in addition to his first ones that are mentioned.
None of those acts are listed as 9/11. What's your point?
Further, the FBI's jurisdiction is not overseas.
So...? That still doesn't change the fact that they don't want him for 9/11.
You don't know me and you have absolutely no idea what I might or might not accept as evidence or proof. Put your crystal ball away, as it's useless for you to try and predict what I might or might not do.
Didn't they teach you how to debate or get a read on people in the NSA? What's your role in the NSA?
Originally posted by SuperViking
None of them are listed as anything in particular- what's YOUR point?
I'm an intel analyst and I'm DAMN good at it.
ATS points? You mean the points you get for coming up with retarded theories and being overly paranoid? No, I don't have many of those. Since they take points for inserting realism into these half-baked delusional theories, I don't have very many.
I like it that way.
You "merely" pointed it out? Really? Why did you persist in arguing when it was explained why to you?
No really- why? Why, if someone is already wanted and considered extremely dangerous, should they update it any more than they did, to say he was wanted for other terrorist acts? Because conspiracy idiots need it? No, that's not even why, because they'd find a way to explain that away, too. We both know that
What are you, a webpage designer? Who cares? People in the field like to deal with REAL things and REAL issues. Not placating conspiracy morons.
Just did, saw me laughing at you. Seriously- you're not respected by educated society, this is why. Insulting real people won't help that.
The FBI wouldn't get him.
Lastly, even if he was you wouldn't accept it as proof of his culpability.
Welcome to ATS, SuperViking. The place where people with inferior debating skills are shot down in flames.
I know, but you keep posting. That's what I don't get.
I'm an intel analyst and I'm DAMN good at it.
What job is it that you hold that gives you special information about such things?
Oh...that's what I thought.
Originally posted by SuperViking
Umm...why should they update their webpage? Can you seriously tell us why?