It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Having lived in Alaska for 25 years, I'll say it's absolutely nothing like a wealth redistribution system. The state generates its own wealth through oil revenues. There is no state sales tax or income tax. Public services are paid for through oil income (interest on it, if you want to get technical), and any surplus is divided among the residents. The amount of the dividend every year is dependent on both oil prices and the stock value of the permanent fund (essentially a dividend-bearing mutual fund owned and managed by the state)
Needless to say, theres a good chance it's going pretty low next year. I think after 1987 it dropped to $300/person, which is the lowest I can remember seeing it. Just my 2 cents.
Nathan
Originally posted by secretthug
Why is it that alot of People on this Forum, never check out what thay are talking about before they Speak or post a comment, They have been giving this Money to Alaskans for over 25 Years, this is not Sarah Palin Playing Barak Obama, The Socialist. (Benevolent Heretic)
Palin's administration last week gained legislative approval for a special $1,200 payment to every Alaskan to help cope with gas prices, which are among the highest in the country.
Originally posted by secretthug
Why is it that alot of People on this Forum, never check out what thay are talking about before they Speak or post a comment, They have been giving this Money to Alaskans for over 25 Years, this is not Sarah Palin Playing Barak Obama, The Socialist. (Benevolent Heretic)
Originally posted by IceColdPro
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
i scanned over 5 pages of partisan bickering, and didn't see mention of Alaska being a commonwealth.
In Alaska, the minerals are owned by the state (i.e., the people). She didn't do anything socialist, she just followed state law. Nothing new. Folks there have been getting a "Christmas bonus" for years from the state as part of the minerals dividend.
True, however, this year Sarah Palin signed off an additional $1200 to EACH alaskan resident that goes on top of the annual dividend.
"Gov. Sarah Palin is almost certain to sign the bill to pay Alaskans the rebate. It was Palin, after all, who last month proposed that lawmakers pay out a $1,200 resource rebate as a way for the state to share some of its multibillion-dollar oil revenue surplus with Alaska residents."
The article goes onto say...
"The energy relief package also includes money to expand the state's Power Cost Equalization program, which provides electricity subsidies in rural areas where power costs are much higher than in the state's major city, Anchorage. Anchorage Republican Rep. Kevin Meyer, a lead architect of House budget bills, said the energy relief package should help residents across a vast and economically diverse state. "We did a good job of addressing rural Alaska's needs," said Meyer, speaking of the electricity subsidy. "Suspending the 8-cent fuel tax will help people who drive a lot in the urban areas." Many lawmakers fretted over distributing $1,200 in free cash to residents. Some questioned whether rich people should get it, whether it was good public policy in an election year, and whether some might use it not for energy but for a big-screen TV set. One lawmaker, Rep. Harry Crawford, D-Anchorage, suggested a good bit of the money might "go up people's noses."
Full Article - I recommend you ALL read it, seems like we all have a little Obama in us after all!
[edit on 30-10-2008 by IceColdPro]
[edit on 30-10-2008 by IceColdPro]
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by IceColdPro
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
i scanned over 5 pages of partisan bickering, and didn't see mention of Alaska being a commonwealth.
In Alaska, the minerals are owned by the state (i.e., the people). She didn't do anything socialist, she just followed state law. Nothing new. Folks there have been getting a "Christmas bonus" for years from the state as part of the minerals dividend.
True, however, this year Sarah Palin signed off an additional $1200 to EACH alaskan resident that goes on top of the annual dividend.
"Gov. Sarah Palin is almost certain to sign the bill to pay Alaskans the rebate. It was Palin, after all, who last month proposed that lawmakers pay out a $1,200 resource rebate as a way for the state to share some of its multibillion-dollar oil revenue surplus with Alaska residents."
The article goes onto say...
"The energy relief package also includes money to expand the state's Power Cost Equalization program, which provides electricity subsidies in rural areas where power costs are much higher than in the state's major city, Anchorage. Anchorage Republican Rep. Kevin Meyer, a lead architect of House budget bills, said the energy relief package should help residents across a vast and economically diverse state. "We did a good job of addressing rural Alaska's needs," said Meyer, speaking of the electricity subsidy. "Suspending the 8-cent fuel tax will help people who drive a lot in the urban areas." Many lawmakers fretted over distributing $1,200 in free cash to residents. Some questioned whether rich people should get it, whether it was good public policy in an election year, and whether some might use it not for energy but for a big-screen TV set. One lawmaker, Rep. Harry Crawford, D-Anchorage, suggested a good bit of the money might "go up people's noses."
Full Article - I recommend you ALL read it, seems like we all have a little Obama in us after all!
[edit on 30-10-2008 by IceColdPro]
[edit on 30-10-2008 by IceColdPro]
But it is a dividend. The money belongs to the people of Alaska legally. She signed off on it because her job was to execute the laws of the state.
Originally posted by IceColdPro
Did you read the article? She signed off on a FURTHER $1200 in the form of a rebate, this money is shared out ON TOP of the dividend that was owed legally. This has NEVER been offered before in the state of Alaska until Palin was Governor. This rebate was part of a NEW bill that Palin introduced.
Further to this she put forth a program called "Power Cost EQUALIZATION", "which provides electricity subsidies in rural areas where power costs are much higher". If Obama had done this in Illinois, the right would have claimed that Obama has previously practiced communism by using tax money to pay a percentage of a citizens energy bill.
I think all of these measures that Palin took were excellent, however, it is a double standard when the right in this forum are claiming that Obama is a commie because he wants to spend tax dollars on working class Americans, who in my humble opinion DESERVE IT!
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
What i wonder is, are people complaining because what Obama said was caught and made a big deal (and they are trying to fling the booger back on the GOP side), or because they are truly concerned about what might be a socialist policy in one of the US states?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
What i wonder is, are people complaining because what Obama said was caught and made a big deal (and they are trying to fling the booger back on the GOP side), or because they are truly concerned about what might be a socialist policy in one of the US states?
Thank you.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm not flinging boogers. My only point is that Sarah Palin has been jumping all over Obama for his "redistribution of wealth", calling him a Socialist (which he isn't - anyone who says that needs to read up on Socialism) when she has supported redistribution of wealth in her own home state as Governor.
NEITHER are Socialist. They are taxing some people (high income and corporations) and giving the benefits to others in the form of a payout or tax cuts.
Redistribution of wealth DOES NOT equal Socialism.
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
reply to post by dariousg
Wow, people sure do know how to justify when it is their guy(gal). Money that should go to private companies is instead given to the state to be spread amongst the people.
No matter when it started, what you call it, or how you try to spin it, it is exactly what she said that Obama would do to destroy this country. That makes her a hypocrite because if she truly believed that, she would be trying to stop it in Alaska wouldn't she?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
while what you say is true, it is her job as the Chief Executive of Alaska to execute the laws of that state. THAT is the most American thing to do...the will of the people.