It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chapter29
That's quite a powerful story - thank you for sharing...
There will always be casualties of war that scars both sides...I never saw a two way firing range while I served, but I do know that I wanted to be put in that situation to see my own true colors...
I was 22 then...now some 15 years later I am thankful I never got the chance...
And I commend you for trying to give him a way out - the only problem is, the person needs to be receptive to the opportunity...unfortunately he wasn't...
Once again...thanks for sharing and I hope this thread gets read by many...
Originally posted by RFBurns
Well maybe you should advise your friend that it wasnt his fault or anyone else's. It was the man driving who is at fault. He should have stopped as requested.
Originally posted by starviego
Originally posted by RFBurns
Well maybe you should advise your friend that it wasnt his fault or anyone else's. It was the man driving who is at fault. He should have stopped as requested.
You are wasting your talents here, friend. You should be one of those counselors the VA uses for suicidal vets. You have the touch. You really do. Really.
Originally posted by Mozzy
i knew lots of people in the army that would've shown more restraint in a situation like that before firing on a civilian vehicle. sorry but it's true.
i can tell you care about your friend but i also think your'e the type of person that would say something like "support our troops" when that's exactly what wwe shouldn't be doing. if you want to support something go support a single mother or a musician. screw the troops, they swore several oaths, asked to be there, and are getting paid for it.
Originally posted by Mozzy
fine fine, but you get the point. all soldiers are not murderers and wouldn't have shredded a car to pieces. maybe a shot or two to get teh point across. the kid's a murderer and he's probably in a unit full of murderers.
sorry for putting words in your mouth but the point is valid. your post is very pro soldier whatever you want to call it. making him sound like a victim.
Stanley Milgram's now famous experiments were designed to test obedience to authority (Milgram, 1963). What Milgram wanted to know was how far humans will go when an authority figure orders them to hurt another human being. Many wondered after the horrors of WWII, and not for the first time, how people could be motivated to commit acts of such brutality towards each other. Not just those in the armed forces, but ordinary people were coerced into carrying out the most cruel and gruesome acts.
But Milgram didn't investigate the extreme situation of war, he wanted to see how people would react under relatively 'ordinary' conditions in the lab. How would people behave when told to give an electrical shock to another person? To what extent would people obey the dictates of the situation and ignore their own misgivings about what they were doing?
During the course of the experiment, each time the 'learner' made a mistake the participant was ordered to administer ever-increasing electrical shocks. Of course the learner kept making mistakes so the teacher (the poor participant) had to keep giving higher and higher electrical shocks, and hearing the resultant screams of pain until finally the learner went quiet.
Participants were not in fact delivering electrical shocks, the learner in the experiment was actually an actor following a rehearsed script. The learner was kept out of sight of the participants so they came to their own assumptions about the pain they were causing. They were, however, left in little doubt that towards the end of the experiment the shocks were extremely painful and the learner might well have been rendered unconscious. When the participant baulked at giving the electrical shocks, the experimenter - an authority figure dressed in a white lab coat - ordered them to continue.