It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By comparing the pre and post Edwards drafts of [Of Pandas and People], three astonishing points emerge: (1) the definition for creation science in early drafts is identical to the definition of Intelligent Design; (2) cognates of the word creation (creationism and creationist), which appeared approximately 150 times were deliberately and systematically replaced with the phrase Intelligent Design; and (3) the changes occurred shortly after the Supreme Court held that creation science is religious and cannot be taught in public school science classes…”
“-To defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral, cultural, and political legacies"
-To replace materialistic explanations with the theistic understanding that nature and human beings are created by God"
"Alongside a focus on the influential opinion-makers, we also seek to build up a popular base of support among our natural constituency, namely, Christians. We will do this primarily through apologetics seminars. We intend these to encourage and equip believers with new scientific evidences that support the faith, as well as "popularize" our ideas in the broader culture.
"Five Year Objective: Spiritual & cultural renewal: Mainline renewal movements begin to appropriate insights from design theory, and to repudiate theologies influenced by materialism; Major Christian denomination(s) defend(s) traditional doctrine of creation & repudiate(s); Darwinism Seminaries increasingly recognize & repudiate naturalistic presuppositions; Positive uptake in public opinion polls on issues such as sexuality, abortion and belief in God"
Originally posted by SamuraiDrifter
trying to attack evolution again by demanding that schools “teach the controversy.”
What Intelligent Design Theorists believe and try to promote... may be an agenda that is being pushed and there may be negative consequences from a reasoned perspective; but there is no conspiracy.
Originally posted by SamuraiDrifter
The OP was probably a little too long for their attention spans.
Originally posted by SlyCM
my own hypothesis - that the chances of a thread being responded to decrease as the strength of the OP's discussion point increases
Originally posted by Hollywood11
OMG the sky is falling. Researching into supernormal phenomena and undertanding things from a higher perspective than modern science currently can will CAUSE ALL PROGRESS TO STOP. ONLY THE REAL CHURCH, THE CHURCH OF PROGRES, THE CHURCH OF SCIENCE, IS THE ONE TRUE WAY.
Originally posted by Hollywood11
OMG the sky is falling. Researching into supernormal phenomena and undertanding things from a higher perspective than modern science currently can will CAUSE ALL PROGRESS TO STOP. ONLY THE REAL CHURCH, THE CHURCH OF PROGRES, THE CHURCH OF SCIENCE, IS THE ONE TRUE WAY.
Owen Gingerich: "One can believe that some of the evolutionary pathways are so intricate and so complex as to be hopelessly improbable by the rules of random chance, But if you do not believe in divine action, then you will simply have to say that random chance was extremely lucky, because the outcome is there to see. Either way, the scientist with theistic metaphysics will approach laboratory problems in much the same way as his atheistic colleague across the hall."
ID'ers are a small, powerless group of radicals that are not even taken seriously amoungst fellow thiests.
Man has developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life. God had no part in this process.
Originally posted by SlyCM
ID'ers are a small, powerless group of radicals that are not even taken seriously amoungst fellow thiests.
Oh, if only...
www.religioustolerance.org...
Beliefs elsewhere in the world:
Belief in creation science seems to be largely a U.S. phenomenon among countries the West. A British survey of 103 Roman Catholic priests, Anglican bishops and Protestant ministers/pastors showed that:
97% do not believe the world was created in six days.
80% do not believe in the existence of Adam and Eve. 4
Originally posted by Horza
What is very interesting is that these polls show the power of the evangelical churches in American society ... and shows how these churches prey on the ignorant.