Former Syrian minister: US guilty for 9/11 attacks

Dakhlallah wrote that on the seventh anniversary of 9/11, the truth about the events remained to be told.

"The world may have to wait 25 years for the truth to come to light and for the secret documents and information about what happened to be presented.

Perhaps he should reveal the truth instead of spouting what is considered an opinion. But then being a Syrian Minister does not make him part of the inner Bush circle ranks. So how does he know?

reply to post by jpm1602


I have to agree with you . Bush must be terrible at poker . His face betrays him.
So the U.S.A intentionally dropped its guard, took a few blows , and with a bloodied nose to show the world and their own citizenry, implemented a plan that they had been sitting on for a while.

I can still hear that woman , interviewed by Michael Moore i believe , saying (with a straight face)...... " I`m willing to give up some of my liberties to protect my freedom"...............Newspeak ,straight out of Orwell's 1984 .
Incredible !

reply to post by IvanZana


My fellow ATSers, it's incredible to see on that good website useless arguments about who did the 9-11 attacks.

What are you thinking about , my friends, huh? That some ATSer or government guy is gonna tell the whole truth, that the people behind the scenes are gonna be caught and tried ? come on, people, let's face it :
We'll NEVER know ! we'll never know the truth because revealing such truths, such horrible and tough things one has to do to protect his country's interests is just too hard for the average Joe to handle. Got it? Will you tell your stupid neighbour the truth about 9-11? He cares more about Oprah's next guest on TV. So please, do me a favour, stop daydreaming and don't be a part of the game! They're reading our posts, analyzing them, and laughing at us while we are stupid owls in daylight !

A lot of the people that support and back the original Government 9/11 story think they are part of something bigger than our Nation.

They know what truthers have to say is true, but in their minds they have to keep the lie going to achieve whatever it is they think these self appointed leaders are trying to achieve.

It is clear what they are trying to achieve.

1. Control of all World finanaces and institutions
2. Citizens without a voice and under Federal control through debt
3. Elimination of world leaders who fight against monetary and banking control
4. Control of all resources including food

5. This is the biggest part right here - Eugenics - population control! Millions of us are going to die due to radical thinking by Zionist World Bankers and those who are really in control of the Military Industrial Complex.

(Rex84 is not just a conspiracy) FEMA camps all around you and waiting.

The food control is coming next - just wait and see

reply to post by IvanZana


Expect this kind of article to come up regularly. While likely entirely true, it places thoughts in sheeple that "people who hate America believe 9/11 is a US government conspiracy". I think you will see that kind of article get mainstream coverage over the next few months as people uncover the facts and present them in an undeniable manner.

[edit on 15-9-2008 by truthquest]

[edit on 15-9-2008 by truthquest]

reply to post by Matt_Mulder



The truth is right there in front of you. Just people are all believing all the media crap around them! Instead of just looking at the evidence already there.

If you want to know the truth just use your intution and your senses in all the clips, documents, speeches and videos of the attacks, especially watch the governments behaviour and treatment of it from then to this point.

I'm sure alot will be revealed too you

Originally posted by andy1033
It does make you wonder what other government intelligence agencies think about 911.

We're unlikely to hear directly from them, but former Italian President Francesco Cossiga went public on this issue in Italy's most famous national newspaper:

"the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack was planned and realized by the CIA and Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world to incriminate Arabic Countries thereby persuading western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan." Corriere Della Sera (roughly translated)

Curiously no other media outlet thought his comments newsworthy, despite Cossiga's speciality in false flag intelligence. He was forced to resign his presidency after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the '60s, '70s and ’80s that were blamed on the government's domestic and geopolitical opposition.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force … the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Another with government intelligence insight is Andreas von Bülow, former state-secretary in the German Ministry of Defence who served on the parliamentary committee on intelligence services supervising German intelligence agencies with access to classified information. He was also a member of the Schalck-Golodkowski investigation committee which inquired into white collar crime in connection with Eastern intelligence services, and criminal activities of Western intelligence services. Together with Michael Meacher, one of the longest serving minsters in the UK Labour government, he has expressed serious doubts about the official 911 story.

Google Video Link

In a parallel universe where common sense still held sway, Bush's government would have been rapidly impeached once the footage of his 9/11 inertia was shown.

Why was Bush holidaying in Florida when US intelligence agencies were warning of "something very, very, very big" and according to the CIA director "the system was blinking red"?

Weeks before 9/11, Tenet said, it could not "get any worse."

Why did Bush proceed to the school long after the FAA had reported multiple civil airline hijacks?

Why did he proceed there after one had struck the WTC?

If he was not being urgently and immediately briefed in his presidential limousine on these events - why not?

Why when told "America is under attack" was he too incurious to tear himself away from his trivial engagement for a moment and ask who or what was attacking America?

Who would choose a Commander in Chief in the age of nuclear warfare who neither acts nor speaks at such a time?

Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of National Defence, Paul Hellyer, muses on the subject:




[edit on 16-9-2008 by EvilAxis]

Originally posted by IvanZana


I am suprised, no opinions.

I guess its true. kinda like that pedophile uncle no one talks about.

Maybe you have a pedophile uncle that nobody talks about, but I don't quite get the reference bud. I hardly think an English language Syrian "report" has any substantive value as far as hard facts go. Don't you realize that this is enemy propaganda? You're really gonna read Iranian or Syrian government run english language "news"? That's brilliant.

Originally posted by ppskylight
Don't you realize that this is enemy propaganda?

Sometimes you get more truth from your "enemy" than those you mistake for friends.

I learned from Iranian TV the War Crimes division of the Counter Terrorism branch of the Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard are investigating allegations of 14 criminal offences committed by Tony Blair, Lord Goldsmith and others under the International Criminal Court Act 2001, which came into effect under English common law, just two days before 9/11.

Whatever you think about the merits of the case, the story is true, although I never heard about it in the UK media.

Originally posted by dariousg
reply to post by IvanZana

 

I have made this point as well about the history of this family. At first I thought it was BS but after looking at the evidence, I found that the Bush family has indeed had a crime ridden history.

But, most 'patriots' *heavy sarcasm due to their ignorance of what that word truly means* stand by this man and his family AND their history of hurting this country. It's about money and power. Period. The 'patriots' that support Bush will simply say that Syria is a terrorist state that is trying to push propoganda against the U.S.

Just research your history folks and you will find some very disturbing facts about the man that is this countries president.

I hear what you are saying about the Bush family. I am not going to argue with you on their character. I think the grandfather was even in on the attempt to bring socialism to the US.

However,
What we are witness to today is not something constructed or devised by our current President. You give the beer loving party kid too much credit.

Yes, the war was in his eyes from jumpstreet but this whole 9/11 stuff was thrust upon him by the men who would be king. I think he tried to veto it. Maybe wanted to find another way.

That could be why the right-wing hawks were after his butt for awhile in the beginning.
His father had to take him behind closed doors and have a little talk with him to get him to sign on.

You know, the kind of talk JFK was given weeks before he took a trip to Dallas? Kennnedy sealed his fate when he threatened to tell the American people about that talk from the shadow government.

Originally posted by chise61

Originally posted by jpm1602
The most glaring discrepancy to me. w sitting with the kiddies reading the ol gray goat as he was being 'briefed' of the event. I will NEVER forget the look on his face. One of a three year old with his hand in the cookie jar.

Let's face it. In that proximity to the action, the ss would have had him underground in fifteen minutes tops.

I couldn't agree with you more, that IMO was a dead give away. They would have wisked him away and had him safely underground within minutes of the attack. Isn't that after all their main priority, to keep the president safe above all else?

The really sad thing is that even if the proof is ever found and revealed, it will still amount to nothing. The ones who had anything to do with it will never be held accountable, they will just find more scapegoats to hold accountable for their actions.

So... The CIA agents on the ground were in on it , too?
Pretty big conspiracy loop you have created there.

Altho,
It is kinda comical to think a plane flying into a buidling 1000 miles or so away, causing a President to have to quickly leave some elementary school kids behind, would stir a panic among them.

Originally posted by EvilAxis


Sometimes you get more truth from your "enemy" than those you mistake for friends.

I learned from Iranian TV the War Crimes division of the Counter Terrorism branch of the Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard are investigating allegations of 14 criminal offences committed by Tony Blair, Lord Goldsmith and others under the International Criminal Court Act 2001, which came into effect under English common law, just two days before 9/11.

Whatever you think about the merits of the case, the story is true, although I never heard about it in the UK media.

Thats because its a blatant lie. They're trying to slander/smear Tony Blair, do you really think that Scotland Yard would give Iranian news agencies information about allegations of criminal acts by Tony Blair, if there was any such evidence? That is a pure fabrication right there my friend. I know who my friends are, don't worry about that. You talk about this case being true, but it is not true, it is a complete fabrication to get people like you within western countries to act exactly the way you are acting. It might be funny, if it weren't so dangerous.

[edit on 17-9-2008 by ppskylight]

Originally posted by Grafilthy
Did anyone catch that documentary on The History Channel last night?? I believe it was called "102 minutes"?? I caught quite a few things in there that were.....I don't know how to explain....scripted??

All the videos, from the beginning, had officials/witnesses saying "terrorists" instead of "plane crash" after the first plane. That seems real weird to me. It was on my mind after the first plane.....but my first thought was "PLANE CRASH".

*Maybe just edited into propaganda*

That is interesting. Discovery and History are both guilty of towing the government line so I did not bother to watch this round. I never believe they will reveal any truth the government does not want them to. It is interesting that you point this out.

Originally posted by ShawNee922

Altho,
It is kinda comical to think a plane flying into a buidling 1000 miles or so away, causing a President to have to quickly leave some elementary school kids behind, would stir a panic among them.

Not like the calming effect of gathering those children around the potium while you announce America is under attack and we are all in danger.

Originally posted by ppskylight
Thats because its a blatant lie. They're trying to slander/smear Tony Blair, do you really think that Scotland Yard would give Iranian news agencies information about allegations of criminal acts by Tony Blair, if there was any such evidence? That is a pure fabrication right there my friend. I know who my friends are, don't worry about that. You talk about this case being true, but it is not true, it is a complete fabrication to get people like you within western countries to act exactly the way you are acting. It might be funny, if it weren't so dangerous.

You see ppskylight, you put so much faith in your own sources of propaganda you can't distinguish between fact and fiction.

Of course Scotland Yard didn't phone Iranian TV to inform them of their investigations into the criminal acts of Tony Blair and Co. It's just Iranian TV chose to cover it but UK/US media didn't.

I understand why you would not believe the story, because although TV and newspaper journalists attended the press conference and asked questions (The Independent), not a single mainstream channel reported it. You don't even find reference to it in John McDonnell's Wikipedia entry. In a sense therefore, it never happened. That's how propaganda works.

John McDonnell MP, International War Law Expert Chris Coverdale and former MI5 agent Annie Machon at the Press Conference, Room C, 1 Parliament Street Tuesday 15th January 2008:

Google Video Link

[edit on 17-9-2008 by EvilAxis]

"If the popular thinking behind the involvement of Bush et al is true, then the orchestration must have been massive. As with anything, the more complicated something gets, the more likely something can go wrong."

In other words, it's not too complex for a handful of muslim religious nuts who barely know how to fly planes and have a small budget hiding in a foriegn country (U.S.)... but it is too complex a conspiracy to be pulled off by a black operation by the US intelligence. Similar to the planned Operation Northwoods. Interesting perspective.

_javascript:icon('')

reply to post by ppskylight


I hope it isnt a lie sunshine,as Blair and his vile friends Lied to us all and ignored our voice when we said NO to the war with Iraq!

Making him the Envoy For Peace in the Middle East was also designed to upset those living in the Middle East!

I know no one in England who supports the war in Iraq,and the more one looks at 9/11 even Afganistan is based on a lie

That despicable little man Alastair Campbell needs to be taken down too!I would like to say how,but the net police would arrest me

Originally posted by andy1033
It does make you wonder what other government intelligence agencies think about 911. I mean countries with no connection what so ever with the event, i wonder what they think. There must be countless people on earth trained by governments to do dodgy stuff, and they know some ins and outs of it.

Does make you wonder.....

Here;s some info tio read and REALY understand:
whatreallyhappened.com...

Leonid Ivashov, Vice President of the Academy of Geopolitical Affairs and former Joint Chief of Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.

Host: And from your point of view Al Qaeda is incapable of [the operation]?
Ivashov: Yes, without any doubt, they could not be capable of achieving this.

So when is the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT GOING TO FACE UP AND ADMIT IT.


I mean just set a date, and just spit it out. Then face life in jail, every single one of them behind that administration of the last 8 years.

At least the guilt is chasing them, as I'm just saying.