It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gateway
reply to post by jamie83
I like some of the arguments made by the pro-abortionist crowd when they equate the fetus as a mere "parasite".
By that same logic then, isn't a one year old, hell even a two year old a parasite since it cannot feed, change, and take care of itself.
Heck, using that argument my ex-wife was a parasite! And does this logic apply to the elderly as well? a parasite!
Originally posted by jamie83
However, a woman can have a needle driven into the skull of a baby that is 1-day away from being born, and claim that she has some sort of Constitutional right to do so.
Originally posted by eNumbra
In what part of America is a third trimester abortion legal?
Iirc anything later than 6months is illegal, and frankly, if you couldn't make up your mind by then, then its too bad.
[edit on 8/30/2008 by eNumbra]
Originally posted by eNumbra
This article Wikipedia seems to suggest the partial-birth abortion procedure makes up for 15% of the 1.4% of all abortions that are late second or early third trimester.
The articles claims it's 2500 to 3000 a year, but the numbers themselves look to be from a 1998 study.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
1. They could ban the procedure. Whether they should or not is another issue.
2. Birth rights.
Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to post by jamie83
Precisely. That is the underlying concept of BIRTH rights.
Article I. All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.
Originally posted by Wotan
I hate this pro-life and pro-abortion arguement.
Why cant people be neutral on the subject and let people decide for themselves what they want to do?
If it doesnt affect you on a personal level, why should it matter to you?
Just butt out of other peoples business I say.
Originally posted by Azrael75
Originally posted by Wotan
I hate this pro-life and pro-abortion arguement.
Why cant people be neutral on the subject and let people decide for themselves what they want to do?
If it doesnt affect you on a personal level, why should it matter to you?
Just butt out of other peoples business I say.
amen!
that and i am kind of sick of seening abortion being debated by old MEN!
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to post by jamie83
Because if you check that excerpt I quoted before, you can see that once a child is born, it has a right to safety and the pursuit of happiness.
Originally posted by Wotan
I hate this pro-life and pro-abortion arguement.
Why cant people be neutral on the subject and let people decide for themselves what they want to do?
If it doesnt affect you on a personal level, why should it matter to you?
Just butt out of other peoples business I say.