Liquid Water seeps at Phoenix site, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 09:51 AM by Woodlock
Originally posted by ArMaP


That is easy to see.

Sol 86


Sol 87, morning

Sol 87, afternoon


The order is correct, what is missing is the other photo before these.

Sol 84, morning.



Armap
Why do you say Sol 84 was missing?
Is there a cover up going on?

Sol-84 in living color.



reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 10:43 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Woodlock



It was (and still is) missing from the page presented on the Opening Post, just that.

As that page does not show the full sequence of all images available (and they are too many for me to post) it is easy for people not to understand what happened, because the first scoop of material left the ice visible and the first photo on that page does not show any ice.

I hope I haven't make things worse with my explanation.


reply posted on 30-8-2008 @ 11:40 AM by Woodlock
ArMap
Then why not show the photo before Sol-84?
Because it's to much work ?
OR
You're being lazy?
OR
It mite some thing you can't go along with?

The earlier photo that show Cupboard was five days (sols) earlier.

Sol-79


Five Sols means five time the Sun can melt and evaporate water.

You say; "it's easy to see what's going on here.
What is going on here at Cupboard on Sol79.
(hint: it's not easy)
(clue: look at sol74)

Sol-74 Dodo & Cupboard



reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 06:04 AM by ArMaP
reply to post by Woodlock


I do trust my work, but the time I lost because of your undue doubts and dubious quotations of my posts is something I can never get back.

But seeing the positive side, I got some good animations showing the ice patch growing.


reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 07:31 PM by rhw007
ArcMap your link for sol 88 wouldn't load is Windows or Firefox:

img184.imageshack.us...

I also with to THANK YOU sincerely for the time, work and talent you put into this question so far....but more especially for both you and Woodlock for the GENORSITY in SHARING that with all of the rest of us.

It is SINCERELY and gratefully appreciated.

There are fewenough folks OUTSIDE NASA that I ALWAYS thank and am apreciative of those that re-check NASA's work and trust their OWN processing to TRULY find out what is happening rather than simply "believe" a NASA Press release simply beause it's from NASA.

We have learned the HARD way since 1976 that NASA's PR's are NOT always true and accurate and outside independant people re-doing the work with the RAW data is always important.

And why it also important to applaud those who do the work at hoe and SHARE their ralent aand work with the rest of us.

Again it IS appreciated. Thank you.

I still think there is an "on-going" action here.

Bob...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^