Blackwater Rent-A-Soldiers to be Indicted?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 04:32 AM by xpert11
reply to post by Scorched Earth



Look continuing to argue over the label the people should be slapped with is merely putting a band aid over the fact that the use of the private sector in war zones is bad news all round. The private sector will always do what is in its best interest so that is why it cant be trusted to do what is the best interests of national security and what is in the best interests of Iraq .

The money that is spend on mercenaries should be used to pay US military personal more and to fund veterans health care .

[edit on 20-8-2008 by xpert11]


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 04:33 AM by Scorched Earth
reply to post by Dan Tanna



Ah so the signature on the paycheck differentiates them from DSS correct?

Yea, sorry, I prefer to live in reality.

They arent armed "troops"

They are Security details. Big difference.


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 04:43 AM by Scorched Earth
reply to post by Dan Tanna



If true, I stand corrected, however being that the article is from NYT, I will withhold comment until I see the actual report.


reply posted on 20-8-2008 @ 05:06 AM by Dan Tanna
Congress oversight report

Hope that helps.

Oh and as for them not being 'for hire' by foriegn governments?

Greystone. BlackWaters 'foreign' oversees 'peace keeper' arm.

Greystone - Blackwater in disguise.

[edit on 20-8-2008 by Dan Tanna]


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 01:49 AM by BlasteR
Originally posted by Scorched Earth
reply to
post by BlasteR



Could you provide an example of the knowledge he possesses that no one else does?


You have ATS too. You can research his threads and posts just as easy as anyone else.. I am not here to speak on behalf of other ATS members anyway.

-ChriS

[edit on 21-8-2008 by BlasteR]


reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 04:33 AM by DocMoreau
Originally posted by Scorched Earth
reply to
post by WyrdeOne



Keeping faces hidden lessens the chances of someone being recognized. If you worked for an unpopular company, would you want everyone knowing what you look like?


Exactly! So if someone were to capture video footage of your illegal actions, it would be harder to indite and convict you of your crimes.

I agree with whomever said that Honorable Men do not need to hide their faces.
DocMoreau
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 3 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Pair Detained in Twitter Homeland Threat Mix-Up
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 68 replies