It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by southern_Guardian
Originally posted by southern_Guardian
As for your son and his IQ of 200, well thats just something else aint it?
That's pretty unkind, sg. Let's leave his son out of this.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by blayze
Originally posted by blayze
Your main argument now is that his answer was insensitive for a 7 year old; first off, she was there of her own free will, and with her parents consent obviously as they were there with her.
What? She was there of her own "free will"?? Don't be absurd - a child of 7 does not have free will. If she is allowed to live her life according to what she wants, then that is child abuse.
Originally posted by blayze
Also on the same thought, you're perpetuating this generalisation now that every single 7 year old child would and i quote, "have nightmares and wet their bed"(something along those lines). Maybe your children at 7 couldnt fathom such an answer, but all children are different. I mean she is asking a candidate a question, shes interested in politics, i think the answer was within her boundries.
*I* was the one who made the bed-wetting remark. And you are right - no 2 kids are the same, which is exactly why Ubama's answer was inappropriate.
Admit it - Barry saw this as an opportunity to pander to the audience. He couldn't give two hoots about the child.
Originally posted by blayze
Okay, what was so unkind about that remark? He's not bringing his son into this, actually Lloyd did that himself, i honestly would think you'd be able to notice that southern_guardian was just refering to how it is half obvious Lloyd is telling tales about his sons intelligence. Or maybe that the person responsible for telling Lloyd his sons IQ is so high, was wrong. I'm sorry lloyd but i do not beleive you're son is up there with the most intelligent in the world, or was for that matter, sorry, i just cant beleive that. The logical part of my brain tells me otherwise.
No, you're just trying to be a smart aleck. Perhaps if you could spell a little better, I'd take your opinion a little more seriously.. I despise idiots.
And in saying this im not trying to hurt Lloyd's son at all or bring him into the argument. So dont flip that one on me either.
Just like all you Obama supporters, huh? I'm not wasting my time posting links to a dozen articles, so you can refute them. It's not that important to me what you believe.
Originally posted by southern_Guardian
I asked you to provide evidence from an impartial respected source, you have not done so. You dont have any evidence Lloyd, only information sourced from rumors.
I guarantee you Fox News will be the final nail in his political coffin before election time. They're the only part of the MSM media that's not in the tank with the Machurian candidate that wants to be President. If he had a legitimate birth certificate, he'd have no need to posts obvious fakes on the web. Wake up..
Fox news is a propaganda news channel, they get paid to tell rightwingers such as yourself what you want to hear. Obama can show his birth certificate and provide other federal authorities to confirm it aswell and people will still believe this rumor going around. He will have to show his birth certificate in person to you Lloyd before you'll believe anything. You just searching for any LIE to use against the man.
Obama has posted an obvious fake online to deceive idiots like you. I can't wait till it goes mainstream.
He has nothing to hide Lloyd thats why he made his birth certificate PUBLIC. He has nothing to hide thats why he chooses not to waste his time proving anything to rightwingers such as yourself. You'll just move onto the next lie about the man.
As I said before, the Constitution applies to American citizens. Prove he is one, or shut up please. A fake certificate may be satisfactory for the Obama crowd, but I expect the real thing.
The constitution gives an individual the right of choice to religion, Obama chooses to be christian, your saying his not a christian, against his word. Where the hell in constitution does it give you the right to tell another man what he must be?
No no, your spreading rumors about him being a closet muslim, he appears to be a muslim to you simply because his father was a none practicing muslim, his telling everybody else that his a Christian, in this country it is the individuals CHOICE to what religion they choose to follow. Obama says his a Christian, that makes him a christian, you have no say in the matter. Is that simple enough for you to understand?
Is there some reason why you repeat yourself over and over again? you sound like a broken record.
Until you can prove that he says his muslim, that he actually practiced being a muslim at youth, you are spreading lies.
what's next.. something idiotic like "I'm rubber and you're glue" as a defense?
I just did, freedom of choice buddy. Now, I am yet to see you provide evidence where he says his muslim and where he practices being a muslim. Heres a link as to what one must do to be a muslim:
www.religioustolerance.org...
Stop acting like one then. Nobody is telling Obama anything..
Dont call me a moron when your the one telling Obama who he must be against his own words.
That's your choice I guess, but don't expect me to reply. I'm tired of talking to a wall.
So what I shouldnt confront the lies you post? Not a chance.
Frankly you ramble, and it makes replying to your nonsense rather tedious.
Oh dont worry about how I choose to provide evidence, the only thing you should worry about is backing up these little rumors you spread around these forums and thus far you've given me nothing but "talk".
Yeah, it is quite impressive isn't it? That twice the average IQ of most people. As I said before, it's all about the genetics.
As for your son and his IQ of 200, well thats just something else aint it?
Originally posted by LLoyd45
I'd prefer the fifties when Anti-American rants wouldn't have been tolerated.
Just because we're the self-appointed watch dogs of freedom, doesn't mean we have to listen to or tolerate Communists or Communist sympathizers on our own soil.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
That is the most Anti-American statement I have read in a long time. We as Americans are the watch-dogs of freedom. Only Fascist's and Soviet communists want to censor anything anti nationalistic.
I am American, and I'd ask our founding fathers, but unfortunately they've been dead for quite some time now. Have you been using a Ouija board to communicate with them or what?
You should try being an American! Its great just ask our constitutional founders!
where exactly do you propose we find one at this late date and time? We basically have two choices, Barack Obama which we know little about, or John McCain who is well-known to the American public, but only slightly more appealing than Bush.
Originally posted by DwaynetheSpecious
Don't you want your new president to be honest?
[edit on 9-8-2008 by DwaynetheSpecious]
Originally posted by LLoyd45
Just because we're the self-appointed watch dogs of freedom, doesn't mean we have to listen to or tolerate Communists or Communist sympathizers on our own soil.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
That is the most Anti-American statement I have read in a long time. We as Americans are the watch-dogs of freedom. Only Fascist's and Soviet communists want to censor anything anti nationalistic.
I am American, and I'd ask our founding fathers, but unfortunately they've been dead for quite some time now. Have you been using a Ouija board to communicate with them or what?
You should try being an American! Its great just ask our constitutional founders!
[edit on 9-8-2008 by LLoyd45]
Just like all you Obama supporters, huh? I'm not wasting my time posting links to a dozen articles, so you can refute them. It's not that important to me what you believe.
Originally posted by LLoyd45
where exactly do you propose we find one at this late date and time? We basically have two choices, Barack Obama which we know little about, or John McCain who is well-known to the American public, but only slightly more appealing than Bush.
Originally posted by DwaynetheSpecious
Don't you want your new president to be honest?
[edit on 9-8-2008 by DwaynetheSpecious]
Andrew,
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
If its not important to you - why bother posting in the first place?
See - here at ATS they honor a mission statement "deny ignorance" part of that carries the burden of proof. Thats why there's forums like "skunk works" where you can post your opinions and not need anything to back them up.
Its called respect for your fellow poster, and more so, respect for your own credibility.
You post all kinds of anti-obama rhetoric and post nothing to back it up.
the only rational conclusions i can draw is
they're disreputable sources like "techguy"
or
you have no sources at all and use these phantom sources that you "refuse" to post as a scapegoat for disinformation.
Either way - .... kinda sad
How funny to see you posting about unsubstantiated information.. You hardly ever provide a source other than yourself or the Obama web site, and post more anti-McCain rhetoric than any other person on the forum.
I typically provide sources for my post, but I'm not going to do so repeatedly for people who will refute them anyway. It's a waste of time and energy. If they want the facts, all they need to do is perform a search. I'm not there personal researcher..
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
How funny to see you posting about unsubstantiated information.. You hardly ever provide a source other than yourself or the Obama web site, and post more anti-McCain rhetoric than any other person on the forum.
you obviously dont read many of my posts.
But in typical conservative fashion - you lie to fit the agenda
Just so the record shows it.
I challenge you to find one post of mine (you can u2u it to me) that ONLY quotes my own thoughts and/or obama's website.
in fact...i challenge you to find one thread i created that quotes obama's website period.
They dont exist.
[edit on 8/9/2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]
Originally posted by AndrewTB
Videos that are often chopped up from original sources to make them come off as if they are something else.
Now this thread isn't about me, or you, or anyone else.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by AndrewTB
Videos that are often chopped up from original sources to make them come off as if they are something else.
Like the video upon which this thread is based?