Originally posted by john124
Russia were planning months in advance for this war according to the EU report.
It wasn't planning, but preparing for the possibility of war. Saakashvilli began threatening to attack South Ossetia for more than a year before the
August War. Several months before the war he initiated a massive troop deployment near the border with South Ossetia, and Georgia began sending
UAV's over the region. All actions by Georgia were pointing to ongoing preparations for war. So of course Russia did not idle, and prepared for the
possibility of conflict.
Russia's preparations were reciprocal. For those who have monitored news on Georgia and South Ossetia for many years as I have, it is pretty clear
that it was Saakashvili that started the escalation that eventually led to war. In fact there are posts on ATS chronicling those events in detail.
Originally posted by john124
[snip], we know that Russia's intentions go beyond peacekeeping duties. This war and probably future wars in the caucasus' are part of Putin's
plans to dominate all pipelines from Asia.
If the intention was to take control over the pipeline running through Georgia, then please explain why Russia didn't occupy the region through which
the pipeline runs? Nothing stood in the way of Russia occupying most of Georgia. You state that you know Putin's intentions, but facts disprove
your theory.
Originally posted by john124
As happened last August - the Kremlin are now setting up another conflict using whatever reckless policies they can think of. It's a classic
strategy for a bigger country to invade a smaller neighbouring country they don't like.
What smaller neighboring countries has Russia invaded and occupied in the last 20 years? Georgia doesn't count, because Russia did not occupy it
when it easily could have.
Originally posted by john124
The people of Abkhazia and S.Ossetia are just being used as pawns, the Kremlin doesn't really care about those people at all - only the Russian
soldiers that are going to be stationed in Abkhazia under a pretence of peacekeeping, along with an airbase with S-300 as well.
What is the greater wrong:
Russia using South Ossetians as pawns or Georgia using them for artillery target practice?
And you could say the very same thing you said about NATO troops in Kosovo. What gives NATO the right to station military assets in Kosovo, while
Russia can't do the same in South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
Originally posted by john124
The Kremlin have ordered the Russian army to ethnic cleanse Ingushetians and North Ossetians, by assassinating young males and at times entire
families.
HUH? What on earth are you talking about?
Originally posted by john124
We know what's going on, and the modern day Kremlin are fascists who even kill people who live in the Russian Federation because they don't like the
look of them.
Right.... Which is why there are millions of Tatars, Bashkirs, Chuvash, Chukchi, Kzakh, Azerbaijani, Armenians, and other ethnical minorities living
and prospering in Russia. Russia has historically been an ethnically diverse country, and continues to be so. You do not know much about Russia do
you?
Originally posted by john124
The kremlin are no better than the Nazi's, and for them to pretend they care about Abkhazian's & S.Ossetian's is so far beyond reality, in fact
it's ridiculous!
You get 5 points for being the first person in a while to compare Russia to Nazis. You can get 10 more if you point out that Putin is Hitler or even
the Devil incarnate.
So according to you the Putin administration is equivalent of a regime that killed millions of people through genocide, tens of millions more through
war, and invaded hundreds of thousands of square miles of territory. Brilliant.
[edit on 30-9-2009 by maloy]