It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is this you second thread on this? I saw the other yest and downloaded your pdf, I m ust say, incredible. You seem to come to similar conclusions as myself, yet you show equations etc, physics, I can only offer my opinion, but for me that is enough. I am half way through your paper, I will continue reading and get back to you. P.s you state that you don't agree with the bg bang theory, have you seen Hawking's new theory on it? Probably not right, but I feel he is getting closer. Anyway, he states that all possibilities and eventualities were created on the initial burst of the singularity and in the next billionth of a nanosecond, all but our reality had 'disappeared' as ours has the most potential for life. I agree up until 'they all disappeared', I think they all settled into their own frequency, seemingly dying from our perspective. EMM
Anyone who calculates the age of the Universe to be 14 billion years old, and those that blindly believe him, are just as bad as those who blindly believe my theories. 14 billion years old is a theory as well based on what they can see and measure currently in the cosmos which is not conclusive by any means.
Planck meter and second are also conventional "theories" that we have blindly accepted. I very strongly believe that they're completely wrong. Plank himself believed there was more to it.
You're a conscious entity and you have mass. Mass is a perception and can only be measure relatively to another piece of mass. Everything is relative, including the way we think.
Large animals have more mass, doesn't mean they have more consciouness or are smarter. The collective make up of our bodies, our brains, the actual structure, is what gives us our unique personal consciousness (be it with denser neurons or not). The more the mass with an less evolved brain is not the same as smaller mass and much more evolved brain. BUT all animals have the "potential" to evolve and surpass their current level of consciousness.
Quarks, neutrinos and tiny particles all become abstract to us and our means of observation because of their size. Read chapter 12 and 15. It explains my theories in forces and quantum particles. Protons and neutrons are miss classified in conventional theory as stated in my theory.
The theory that space-time is infinite was derived from my underlining theory that realities are relative separated by a barrier of perception which involves space and time. If you read the book, the first few pages stipulate that I give credit to classical and modern day science but I take nothing as factual thus to start from fresh perscpective. So whatever is currently accepted, as part of good science, be constantly questioned and reanalyzed. People of faith are sometime critized for blindly following doctrine, the same can be said for scientists blindly following established science. I don't believe my work is pseudoscience at all because that would imply all proposed scientific theories are pseudoscience. The current science establishment unspokenly requires that anyone with a theory take very small steps in the claims of their theories, I unfortunately didn't do that which automatically labels it all under pseudoscience. I released a book with all my theories for many reasons. I already knew this is how it was going to be blindly percieved by some and I'm not calling you out. The fact you logically refuted my theories is admirable, though I don't think you read my book.
In the book I state that 1 space-time density is the space-time density as we percieve it being expelled at the Earth's surface. Its not the same as the density of space-time being expelled by Jupiter or the Sun, but would be measured relative to the Earth's space-time density. It's a reference point.
It doesn't negate the general theory of relativity, just reverses it on some points. There is alot to explain, so it best you download a copy of the book and flip around though I'd recommend reading from the beginning.
I'll try to explain light. Light, all measurable light, is a space-time vibration produced by excited atoms, but electrons changing orbits cause photons to leave the atomic system. What is actually happening is that these electrons fluctuate/vibrate space-time "substance" medium as they flip orbits in the excited atom. All "known" photons are generated in the same fashion. In my book I talk about space-time vibrations/ripples/fluctuations that are caused by "any" mass moving/accelerating from point A to point B. When it moves it distorts space-time, just like an excited electron. The only difference, the bigger the mass causing the vibration the slower the vibration. The smaller the mass the faster the vibration. Because the source of all measurable light is the same, all currently visible light travels at c. What if the vibration was caused by an object smaller than an electron or off the surface of an electron? First off we couldn't measure or even see this light, but it would still exist and in my book I call this quantum light and sub-quantum light and this light (space-time vibration) is much, much faster than c (I calculate the it speed in the book). You have to download the book to see how this was calculated and described in more detail.
I'll try to explain my reasoning for the existence of God here. Just the other day I explained it to an elderly woman in the same way and she just smiled and agreed. I was happy she understood.
You have 2 locations A and B and they are a distance away from eachother say 10 feet.
What are the things that will happen when you move from A to B? There actually a few things.
1) traverse distance
2) time passes moving from A to B
That's where current science stops and says that it! But its not. There is 1 more things that happens and it can be broke up into:
3a) The person (you) have to want to move from A to B...it nots a given you still have to want it thus conscious will
3b) You have to understand that you are moving from A to B.
If what was moving from A to B was a object you can neglect #3a but #3b still remains because you "the observer" see the object moving from A to B and understand that its moving or undestood that it moved. There is always conscious involvement.
So the 3rd thing to a moving object is:
#3 conscious awareness that understand that it is moving
Even the smallest of life on this planet have basic "instinct" to know is something is moving in front of them, crossing their path.
So dimension, redefined, is space-time-consciousness.
Now what does this say?
Basically, if consciousness is part of space and time, then it must have properties similar to space and time. The one property that both space and time have are that both are infinite. They can start off very small and end up enormously huge to infinity.
So consciousness must be the same. It too must be infinite, where it can start off very small and go to infinity. This means small animals, insects, are a lower level of consciousness compared to a cat or dog. Cats and dog would be less than us on the consciousness meter. Consciousness meaning awareness, understanding, knowledge and enlightenment.
But there is one more thing consciousness eludes to. Anything that is conscious is alive!
Thus at the infinite level of consciousness, that entity is infinitely aware, infinitely understanding, infinitely knowledgeable and infinitely enlightened.
So since consciousness is part of space-time and space and time is everywhere so too is consciousness and since our existence contains all of infinite space-time-consciousness, this makes up the largest single entity with all of space, time and consciousness as its makeup, body or being.
Since this Existence we all live in gave us life, nurtured us and raised us, then this Existence is God.
And God is only one because Existence is only one.
Here one way to think of it. Star systems are bonded together due to two cause and effects which are relative equivalents to molecular bonds between atoms. The difference is that molecular bonds have a higher concentration of space (space-time density) which effects its relative passage of time to be much faster than our passage of time because more "space" is packed into a portion of our perceivable space (quantum space-time is denser or consider it higher energy). My theory is that atoms and star systems are "relative " equivalents (www.gpofr.com). These two "cause and effects" that lead to bonding of systems are much faster at the quantum scale...essentiall y c times faster than c (c^2), thus forces at the quantum scale are stronger and cover unimaginable distances c times faster than c. This explains the "spookiness " of this observation. I believe we have to start thinking outside the "box" especially on this one. The "box" is old and decaying...its isotopic half-life is up.