posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:46 AM
For those who feel we are Authentic Native Earth Creatures, I ask you this:
1.) What part of our DNA proves that it was untampered with at any point in time? How does one prove that even what we consider Native Earth
Creatures, are truly Native Earth Creatures?
2.) Dogs are not Native Earth Creatures but rather "Genetic Modifications" of Wolves sought out by Humans to serve a purpose. How would you prove,
if unaware of this fact, that Dogs were not intentional alterations of prior life forms on Earth?
3.) Other lifeforms on Earth that have survived up until this current day, have evolved physical and behavioral characteristics that better serve
their survival in Earth's Environments. So if other surviving species have evolved traits to better suit their survival on Earth, then why is it that
Humans need to "Evolve" the Earth to better suit their survival on it?
4.) What is the Natural Environment of the Human Being? What environment on Earth does our physical genetic traits ensure that we will out survive
other competing animals long enough to when we started using and advancing tools? (Remember, we are slow comparatively to other species on land, we
spend the longest time of all species before we can survive on our own without our mother, we can't survive in trees, we must be taught survival
because our minds are not wired instinctually in order to do so, our conscious mind is an obstacle we must overcome to survive, we require tools for
our lack of physical genetic advantages, we cannot kill or catch any prey without tools and by any I mean enough to sustain ourselves, we have no fur
coat and our lack of such is not shared by other species aside from those living in deserts or in the water in which we are not genetically fit to
survive in without tools, and our ability to see a wide range of colors serves us no real advantage in acquiring resources or reproducing better than
other species in our environment.) Once again I ask, what is the Human Being's Natural Environment?
5.) When a genetic trait proves to be the dominant advantage for survival in an environment, other species start to evolve or come close to similar
traits in that environment. What I mean by this is, whales lets say, they all have tail fins, dorsal fins, fairly similar bone structures, now let's
expand out to other aquatic species like fish which have fins and tail-fins just orientated differently, all airborne species have wings of one sort
or another, all birds have feathers, fish have scales and gills, effective land mammals are quadrupeds, insects have 6 legs, etc. etc. If having a
larger more comprehensive brain led to humans becoming the Dominant Species on the ENTIRE PLANET...wouldn't there be some runners up? The closest
thing exhibiting any sign of higher intelligence are chimps with their very minimal, not mandatory tool use and dolphins which are not even from our
same environment. It is evident that a more complex mind, in nature, is not of any advantage to where we cannot document say the chimp populations
becoming smarter more complex thinkers.
6.) So with our disadvantaged physical makeup, no specific Natural Environment, useless evolutionary trait of having a more comprehensive mind, having
increased emotional activity, mandatory reliance on tools because of our inability to survive with our physical attributes only, limited diet in which
we have to cook meat and can't digest leaves, we give birth, for the most part, one offspring at a time, we've pretty much been cut off from nature
having no instincts, and we must alter the Earth to better fit our living conditions...isn't this enough to consider that most likely we are not from
7.) Like a virus, we intrude our host environment then manipulate the host environment to better serve our survival at whatever cost to the host...a
virus is a FOREIGN BODY that enters a HOST...just look around you look what we've done to the Earth...do you REALLY BELIEVE WE ARE A NATURAL