The Protocols of Zion, page 3

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 07:59 AM by Skyfloating

reply to post by Swingarm

MODERATOR NOTE:

Plagarism and copy/pasting from other sources without external-quote-tags and your own discussion comments is against the ATS Terms and Conditions of Use.

Plagarised Posts and book spammings will be deleted.

[edit on 20-7-2008 by Skyfloating]

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 08:17 AM by Swingarm

reply to post by Skyfloating

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 09:58 AM by Anonymous ATS

if non-fiction books and documents are to only allow bias information, including what lies schools may be teaching, truth seem to be in fiction books and some video games a story that contains: NWO, Psychic power, spiritual energy.
EX: fantasy books, final fantasy 7(shinra company using earth scalar energy)
ff12(waging war for sake of power even kill his brothers and father), Read or Die TV series(NWO under British ruled where U.S. trick into supporting it.)
I believe there are more truth in fiction than in non-fiction.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 10:00 AM by Anonymous ATS

how can it be a hoax when what was written has happened throughout the course of the 20th Century??

read the protocols and look at the world and tell me you cant see the similarities.

no one knows for sure who wrote it, jew or gentile.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 11:30 AM by Grey Magic

Well to take this out of proportions, 1984 isn't a hoax and it is already 2008 and we see big brother getting larger every year.

I read once someone say that 1984 was optimistic.

So whatever the protocols of Zion are, hoax or not... (maybe Illuminati/Rothschild handbook)

The fact is that it's a creepy book compared to what is going on in the world.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 12:50 PM by homo_borg

Originally posted by hinky
reply to post by Swingarm

The very first paragraph of your glorious post about the publishing of some new conspiracy book, mentions "diverse" historians. I'm sorry, I'm not a well educated man but does the term "diverse" mean revisionist or fake historian? Do you even need formal education in a real college setting complete with a degree to be considered a "diverse" historian?

There is no proof that Roosevelt knew anything about Pearl Harbor. I believe there were several congressional hearings which would have been more than happy to find a demoncrat at fault for Japan's attack.

Known history and truthful facts will never stop a hoax or conspiracy, as has been proven hundreds of times within this site, but keep the lack of knowledge alive.

Your entire post is malarkey. You know what malarkey is, its the "white" part of chicken sh*t.

Most of the "hoaxes" or "conspiracies" on this site are backed up by well-educated researchers as opposed to skeptics who add nothing but "BS this and BS that" with nothing but an acceptance of mainstream knowledge.

"Known history and truthful facts" can be manipulated by people who have an agenda. And only the clueless sheeps fall for it. It's always wise to question the official story, even if you get nothing out of it.

en.wikipedia.org...

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 01:02 PM by hinky

No thanks for a wiki citation.

They are as reliable as a reference as many of the self educated experts already on the internet. Wiki has it's place for use as a reference, this place is a prime example of it. A place for ignorance feeding upon itself trying to find the real truth while disavowing known, historical facts that were published before this golden age of all knowing enlightenment of digital nonsense.

Now, go back to your summer school homework...

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 02:17 PM by malcr

Originally posted by Mad_Hatter

I mean, the conclusive proof is there that it is a hoax. But I guess you can't argue with conspirators that think anyone who doesn't agree is a disinfo agent.

[edit on 7/19/2008 by Mad_Hatter]

So you're a disinfo agent, whew thank God I can now ignore you. I was beginning to really believe it was a hoax.........

It's sad fact of life that there are people who continue to believe in total BS despite a wealth of cross referenced and corroborated evidence that they are deluding themselves. Dare I mention ......... better not

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 03:29 PM by FatherLukeDuke

Originally posted by kcfusion
Why such a concern over wether its a hoax or not???? All you need to do is open your eyes and look around the credibilty of the material doesnt even matter.

That's the spirit!

Who cares about facts and the truth when you can find something that fits your twisted, paranoid world view.

Swingarm - your murdering of history makes my head spin. Utter rubbish.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 03:36 PM by Mad_Hatter

Click here for more information.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 03:49 PM by Mad_Hatter

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 04:38 PM by Dubyakadubla

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 05:00 PM by neformore

From the Terms & Conditions Of Use

1a) Offensive Content: You will not post links to images or use avatars and signatures that are offensive, abusive, distruptive and/or hateful. You will not use images, avatars or link to domains that contain gore, mutilation, pornography or illegal(2e) content. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

and

1c.) Intellectual Property: You will not post any copyrighted material, material belonging to another person, material previously posted by you on another website nor link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution, as defined by The Owners, to its original source.

I don't know how much clearer we have to be about this. I'm done explaining it to people.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 05:33 PM by Duzey

Before this discussion progresses any further, let's all take a moment to review some relevant portions of the Terms and Condition of ATS that every member here agreed to when signing up.

1a) Offensive Content: You will not post links to images or use avatars and signatures that are offensive, abusive, distruptive and/or hateful. You will not use images, avatars or link to domains that contain gore, mutilation, pornography or illegal(2e) content. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

1c.) Intellectual Property: You will not post any copyrighted material, material belonging to another person, material previously posted by you on another website nor link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution, as defined by The Owners, to its original source.

2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.

5b) Cooperation: You will, if asked by myself or a moderator, cease posting any content, and/or links to content, deemed offensive, objectionable, or in poor taste by the representatives of the message board.

7) Violation: Violation of any aspect of the Terms and Conditions of use are subject to our Actions for general abuse and violations. Or, in extreme cases, immediate banning of your username/ IP from the domains and/or the removal of your email/password from the database. In all disputes, the decisions of one of the Partners or administrative staff are final.

9)Term of These Agreed Upon Conditions: By joining the website(s) governed under these Terms And Conditions, you agree to honor these rules for so long as your account status remains active, and for 18 months after the termination of any account privileges due to violation of these conditions or other guidelines.

From this point forward, all posts that do not conform to the T&C or are off-topic will be deleted. If the members can discuss this topic within the T&C's the thread will remain open. If the majority of the posts in this thread do not conform to the T&C's, it will be closed.

The decision is yours.

[edit on 20-7-2008 by Duzey]

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 05:49 PM by GoldenFleece

If the Protocols of Zion is a hoax (which I don't necessarily believe to be a Jewish conspiracy), why has every part of it come true?

It's actually the Protocols of Sion.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 07:56 PM by Swingarm

reply to post by FatherLukeDuke

Why don't you illuminate us father. Seems every time I read a post from your Holiness you make these kind of statements, or " I wouldn't trust him to organize an orgy in a brothel" which BTW is a good one, When you said it, I saw Jimmy Swaggart sobbing in my minds eye.

Please do bring us back to reality.

[edit on 20-7-2008 by Swingarm]

[edit on 20-7-2008 by Swingarm]

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 09:09 PM by Swingarm

If the Protocols of Zion is a hoax (which I don't necessarily believe to be a Jewish conspiracy), why has every part of it come true?

reply to post by GoldenFleece

I agree,Here are some interesting transcrpts from Bill Cooper's "The Hour Of The Time" titled "The Ugly Truth about the ADL" and "Dope Inc"

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 09:18 PM by ruse45

Originally posted by Swingarm

I agree,Here are some interesting transcrpts from Bill Cooper's "The Hour Of The Time" titled "The Ugly Truth about the ADL" and "Dope Inc"

lovely link....swingarm, but if this is true, why are these people not charged for treason, it's not an american thing to do, is it ?

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 09:26 PM by Swingarm

reply to post by ruse45

why are these people not charged for treason,?

The US no longer charges anyone for treason. It's out of of style.

reply posted on 20-7-2008 @ 09:33 PM by ruse45

Originally posted by Swingarm
reply to post by ruse45

The US no longer charges anyone for treason. It's out of of style.

but that's crazy, you mean to tell me that treason is no more a crime