It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by observer
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
reply to post by observer
What is wrong with having my own take on the myth of Icarus? If that disqualifies me from discerning Biblical truth, then I don't know what to tell you.
Sin separates us from God whether we are saved or not. The difference is if we are saved the separation isn't permanent. I believe homosexuality is the unnatural use of God's gift, our bodies, according to Romans 1. You are free to agree or disagree with me on that. You are free to question whether I am a "True Christian" or not. My comment on what True Christians do is founded on the Great Commission of Matthew 28:18-20. I believe it. God's Truth is incorruptible, discernible through the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
[edit on 20-7-2008 by Icarus Rising]
Well you discount your whole fundamentalist argument by saying it is "ok to have your own interpretation of the myth of Icarus". By this logic you are ok with reinterpreting religious texts to ones taste. This you cannot argue against as the original text of Icarus does NOT agree with your account. So if you are ok with reinterpretation of literal texts why are you so against the reinterpretation of others? Are you and your texts best? Better, Best? Or is it that you view the story or Icarus as a moral parable that teaches us something, and you are attached what you believe to that to expand on that and give it deeper meaning to you? If this is the case, what makes your "interpretation" of the NT so definitive and absolute? Jesus was real, he died for us (as far as I am concerned) but was his word not intentionally confounding. For the development of mankind, for the changing world. This world is not stuck in the same sand soaked backward backwater that Jesus lived in, and nether is God himself, that is why Jesus (not Paul, who was NOT a disciple of Jesus until is gained him some earthly fame) was so obtuse. Paul was after control (and most of the anti gay arguments come from his writings), not converts. Paul was not even a Jew, Paul did not even KNOW Jesus when he lived. Again, Paul wanted converts, and hatred sold just as well then a it does now. Jesus was after rebels, I hope I am a rebel, God loves the different, why else would he create the platypus? We will have to agree to disagree on this. I (begrudgingly) respect your opinion for what it is, yours. That of a mind God created, I just believe you are wrong.
Romans 1
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
I hope you will give me some leeway in answering the off topic questions posed to me.
Originally posted by intrepid
So do you have a problem with Caribana(celebrates Carib and South American heretage)? How about Greek festivals? Italian festivals?
Edit to add: What about the Million Man March?
[edit on 20-7-2008 by intrepid]
Originally posted by HypnoAsp
They parade as they are a minority struggling for their rights.
As for rainbows and stickers, we have all seen the naked lady stickers (you know the same symbol on the back of 18 wheeler flaps)? What exactly is that sticker asserting other than straight and sexually active?
Originally posted by Annee
hmmmmm - looks just like Mardi Gras
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
The gay people weren't flaunting. They were having a gathering. The Christians showed up and stuck their faces in there. THEY flaunted their Christianity in the faces of the gay people. THEY caused a disturbance. They didn't have to attend.
Right?
Originally posted by BlueTriangle
What if the government funded an anti-gay gathering. Would that be OK?
Originally posted by BlueTriangle
What if the government funded an anti-gay gathering. Would that be OK?
We taxpayers do pay everyday for anti-gay gatherings - because churches are not taxed. And what they don't pay in taxes I have to. At least that is how I look at it.
Originally posted by slackerwire
Next time you see any of these types of people at a Caribana or an Italian fest, let me know, then we can debate the topic.