posted on Jul, 11 2008 @ 07:03 PM
Dark Blue Skies,
No, I'm undecided yet, my momentary stance on the subject is based on the following observations :
1. The evidence of a decades long (planned in advance) psychological warfare-based deception are gaining enormous momentum at present.
Since the delay at the take-off airport messed up the carefully planned flight plan for Flight 93, it didn't fit anymore in the deception, it would
damage the carefully planned deception, when it would have managed to hit another, fourth target in Washington, after that long delay, and ALSO would
have avoided all fighter jets in the air at that time.
The public, even in a patriotic frenzy, would not have been so stupid, to believe such an illogical event for too long. And definitely not the
uninformed, majority of the military.
2. There are too many, seemingly uninvolved in any deception, witnesses, who saw a commercial airliner high in the skies above Shanksville, and there
are a few who saw or heard other low flying jets not even remotely looking like an airliner. (not so amazing btw, the area is a remote one, and
3. The low flying jets were identified with a great percentage of validity as :
a. A white Wardhog dive bomber/tank-killer jet, usually equipped with an impressive amount of air-to-air rockets and a heavy cannon. It has a double
tail with a big fin on top, and two fat jet-engines.
Identified by one of the very believable eyewitnesses by looking at photos of possible planes, when asked to identify the one she saw flying very low
over the tree tops, at the same time when flight 93 came down while obviously struggling to keep airborne.
b. The biggest surprise to me, a circa 3 meter wide white military drone, flying in front of a woman in a car, just a few meters above ground, then
tilting just enough to skim over the treetops, and disappearing towards the spot where she saw the following explosion and smoke of the impact of
presumably flight 93 in the ground. She did not actually witness the impact, just saw the smoke billowing up.
Domenick DiMaggio from CIT interviewed and videotaped this woman, and she gives an impression of a very honest, concerned American to me.
Please note that such a drone is a relatively slow flying plane, more shaped like a fairly big model-plane.
The Wardhog is also capable of flying fairly slow, much slower than a fighter jet. But it can also keep at pace with a fast airliner, if needed.
Then we have the official explanation for a second jet, the LearJet said to be instructed by Flight Controllers to take a look at the impact site.
Strangely enough, no one saw that one, while all available eyes were skimming the skies after the impact and subsequent smoke column billowing into
the sky. (Remember, if you believe in a deception, that LearJet is surely a deceptive invention, afterwards).
I have no great faith in any official reports of black box audio and data, since their appearances came years too late to be believable anymore.
It is another possibility, however unlikely, since the unexpected delay at take-off, that Flight 93 WAS a part of the deception, all the way until the
moment of the crash, to increase the expected wave of patriotism sweeping the nation on 9/11.
It is even remotely possible, that the same trick has been played on the world audience, clustered to their TV's, as at the Pentagon, where we now
see more CIT evidence of a north of Citgo flightpath, which totally nullifies the officially promoted south of Citgo flight path, including the
officially downed light poles, and the official damage path inside the Pentagon, in line with the downed light poles. A north of Citgo flying airliner
could never ever have downed any of these light poles.
In that case, all the 9/11 official explanations are plain old lies.
So, perhaps the same trick was played at Shanksville, with a dive down of Flight 93, and a fly-over of the "impact" crater spot, and a disappearance
of 93 flying low, under the radar, to another airport. While the drone or the Wardhog caused the crater, by means of physical impact, or use of
explosives or rockets.
That drone is the most mysterious appearance on the scene of Shanksville, it's necessity is not yet clear to me, but there must have been a very
serious reason for the deception-planners, to include this drone in that event.
Perhaps you have a logical explanation for this drone?
Note that supposedly the delay of flight 93's take-off must have caused great stress for the planners and perpetrators of that day, so how could that
drone have been planned at forehand, the thing is much too slow to have been thrown in unexpected.
It must have been launched by a C-130 (which was 20 miles away, the same one which checked the impact at the Pentagon, just after impact, then passed
Shanksville and checked that impact also out for Flight Control) or by a NOAC "doomsday" plane, or any even more mysterious explanation for its
existence on that spot on that day.
There must have been multiple layers of protection in place, at all costs, for the Deception to be played upon us, with no room for disastrous