There is a lot more and the traditional archeologists sweep it under the table or ignore the evidence.

Here is a question for you - if you are an archaeologist - how do you get:

Book deals?
In National Geographic?
Grants?
Tenure?
Become Famous?
Gain leadership in your chosen field?

Do you do it by not finding anything or are the people who obtain the above the ones that do?

Kinda counter-intuitive to what you are suggestion, eh?

Originally posted by IvanZana
This story has been debunked.

Its just a fairy tale backed with no evidence and a lack of any type of serious investigation.

Well we've been waiting for IvanZana to back up his claim...but....

It would seems he was justing making stuff up, something which he is admittedly rather good at.

Still no response

Well we can take it that he just made up that comment. He does seem to like to lie about stuff to try an impress people.

Ivanzana comments DEBUNKED

I'm just trying to calibrate this particular find with a couple of other things.

for instance... this group of hunters had to have not been the premier group of pre-people of that era...
Why not?
because at that era/epoch (or whatever) the present Sahara desert was a tropical area with sloths, and other exotic animals & mammals...pretty much like a Amazon in decline, and not a foreboding desert like the Arabian peninsula and especially regions like Qatar are and were throughout history.
So, that supposed encampment/'civilized focal point' was way far away from the prime hunting and thriving areas that the dominant tribes would wish and desire to live in---IOW that group encampments' residents were finge & marginal pre-hominids that died out (by any logical reasoning) were not civilized or organized or made any mark in the human '
tree'



there's still another comparison to make:

all these pole-shift advocates say that the middle east, at that era, was located at the south pole... while antarctica was situated on the present equator at the time that the ancient Qatar inhabitants were doing their thing. That is another conumdrum -. either the pole-shifters are out in left field or the main-stream science community is completely wrong about a 'settlement' with hominids/humans/anthrophomorphic individuals.


thanks,