It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
it shouldnt.if you look at the theory of evolution then you have to look at how life originated in the first place right,there was nothing then there was life,how does something come out of nothing,but you could also look at god in the same way,something started somewhere either way.but to answer the question you would have specify a certain aspect of science,i see no problem if evolution doesnt consider itself a religion...right,but the problem is so many people insist there is no god and evolution took gods place and there is when arguments ensue over the matter.
Originally posted by mental modulator
How old is the earth again?the bible doesnt say,apparently some people trace genalogy back to an approximate 7,000 years i think....but how accurate can that be...bible does not clarify
Where did races come from?
god created hem,doesnt really say how or where.
What are dinosaurs and how old are dinosaurs if they are real?
What indicates proof of an event if the event was in the distant past?not sure what youre asking there
Why does some science threaten your faith in god?
Originally posted by keeff
seems to me you are just looking for someone to argue with.
i did study the bible for about 4 years and decided that there are other more accurate writings of our past history.
i do not know the answers according to the bible about your questions off hand, but i am interested to see the outcome of this thread.
also the other 20 books left out of the bible i think would help explain some of these questions.
Edited to fix spelling errors.
[edit on 6/24/2008 by keeff]
Originally posted by mental modulator
Why does some science threaten your faith in god?
Originally posted by sollie
What makes you think all "Bible folks" would have the answers?
Or even care about the questions?
Is this what the "Bible" is meant to be teachin "folks"?
God help us if it is.
[edit on 25-6-2008 by sollie]
Originally posted by Mahree
Originally posted by mental modulator
Why does some science threaten your faith in god?
Science does not threaten my faith in God.
I believe that the Bible is the word of God. Proven science and God's words work together.
[edit on 6/25/2008 by Mahree]
[edit on 6/25/2008 by Mahree]
i love how you claim evidence for evolution is staggering,would you mind posting something staggering for us...or are you saying we should all belive you.........genius
Originally posted by dave420
reply to post by pureevil81
Abiogenesis is not evolution. You don't have to have answers to both for either to be real. As it is, the evidence for evolution is staggering, and the evidence for the bible being god's word is nil. Absolutely nil. Oh, apart from the bible claiming it, which is about as moronic as it can get. "I'm the word of God. How do you know? Because I'm the word of God, and I say I am the word of God." Genius.
Originally posted by mental modulator
How old is the earth again?
Originally posted by mental modulator
Where did races come from?
Originally posted by mental modulator
What are dinosaurs and how old are dinosaurs if they are real?
Originally posted by mental modulator
What indicates proof of an event if the event was in the distant past?
Originally posted by mental modulator
Why does some science threaten your faith in god?
Originally posted by mental modulator
Originally posted by Mahree
Originally posted by mental modulator
Okay so if the world has been scientifically dated as being billions of years old, why has there been rabid discussion on the matter here? If some people believe that the world is only thousands of years old and they argue this point, what is the science behind it?
For the bible literalists, at what point does "science" become accurate again? If science says billions and moses "says" thousands ???
I don't believe that the bible dates the world as "thousands of years old".
In the bible the story of creation follows pretty much the same as the scientific "facts".