TheComete, all of your links are from government sites. Don't you think
they could be a little biased?
For over 100 years, science and medicine have understood the poisonous nature of fluoride. In the 1930’s and 40’s, giant US companies, e.g. ALCOA, were sued for millions of dollars due to toxic fluoride waste belching from factory smokestacks killing crops and livestock. ALCOA’s owners (Mellon) figured that if people could be persuaded fluoride isn’t poisonous but is good for teeth, profits could be protected. So, to introduce water fluoridation, they hired the brilliant ‘father of propaganda’ Edward L. Bernays. Joined later by other fluoride polluting industries (e.g. nuclear) and the multi-billion dollar sugar, toothpaste, confectionary and soft drink industries, they became strong financial supporters of dental associations that supported fluoridation. One such support group, the Dental Health Education & Research Foundation, was founded in Australia in 1962. DHERF’s Governors, Members and donors have included key representatives from Coca-Cola, CSR, Kelloggs, Colgate-Palmolive, Wrigleys, Arnotts, Scanlens, Cadbury Schweppes, etc.
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by harvib
Sometimes they add a bit to reach 1ppm. Sometimes they have to take away a bit to reach 1ppm. Most naturally occurring water has fluoride at levels between .5 mg/l to 4mg/l. (1ppm=1mg/l). So you see, more often excess fluoride has to be taken out of the water to reach safe level of 1mg/l or 1ppm.
[edit on 16-6-2008 by TheComte]
Originally posted by schrodingers dog
reply to post by MrPenny
What part of having the right to choose my own supplements or medications is being an activist? You say fluoride is healthy, fine. Do you mind if I decide for myself? How would you like it if I spray your dinner with healthy supplements without your consent?