I challenge any self proclaimed debunker to debunk these pages :
I challenge NIST Answers to FAQ - Supplement (December 14, 2007)
Page 1 :
to page 11 :
Take your time to read all 11 pages, and follow my links to my original thesis at the Study of 911 website, and all other links I provided.
Intelligent members of JREF have tried and failed, NIST has tried to come up with explanations and failed and subsequently removed (in fact hid) all
their former seismic evidence pages from all of their latest reports, and you know why?
Because I used their own facts against them, and those facts can't be refused by the same institutions who provided those facts in the first
First, facts from pages provided by NIST ( their extensive 9/11 time lines published, all compared to atomic clock times from NIST it self), and
secondly LDEO ( their 9/11 seismic evidence published within days and weeks after 9/11 was executed).
And this proof of external energy involved in the destruction of WTC 7, the third WTC tower to collapse on 9/11, is based solely on simple basic
No complicated science involved and no need to throw around complicated Math, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering or whatever other specialisms.
Everyone who completed basic school, can easily comprehend my explanations, and will come to conclude what I concluded :
When the WTC 7 collapse was a definitive staged event, then WTC 2 and 1 collapses were also staged events, and subsequent strong evidence for the
Twin Towers demolition is provided alongside the WTC 7 evidence, too.
Read, and wake up from the "news" media induced, artificial lethargy.
The events on 09-11-2001 were staged events.
Who pulled the strings in that tragedy, is the next tidbit to unravel.
All bets are open on that one, and it still could be that the US government and military was, and still is, so embarrassed by the fact that they
couldn't prevent such an elaborate planned event, that it caused them to try to HIDE all the evidence, instead of showing it and take the blame, but
at least then prevent another similar scenario to ever be completed again in the future.
NIST is the US institution which was ordered and paid by the US government to construct the officially accepted US explanation of the 9/11 events.
LDEO is the official US seismic institute which was profiled within days after 9/11 as the one institute which recorded the official seismic
recordings of the impacts and collapses on 9/11.
When you compare the facts from both official US institutes, there are grave inconsistencies within these facts, which even lead to the inevitable
conclusion that some huge external form of energy was introduced 6 seconds before any sign of global collapse was visible real-time, at New York's
WTC 7 site on 9/11.
A form of energy, bigger than the total amount of energy recorded from the complete mass of that building collapsing to, and hitting the ground.
Thus, far in advance of the first visual dent in the eastern penthouse roof of WTC 7.
Which was followed 8.2 seconds later by the collapse of that penthouse, followed by the collapse of the western penthouse, and then global collapse of
the whole 47 floors high building started.