It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
NEVER in our nations history has the rights of U.S. citizens been given to terrorist caught on the battlefield.
Originally posted by C0le
No Bush is incorrect as are you, The Constitution lays the foundation for the rights of all men, not just Americans
Originally posted by Grambler
The problem is you are making an assumption of guilt before a trial. You apparently think everyone their was trying to kill US soldiers, but that not true:
Originally posted by mybigunit
I think the constitution says that all humans have inalienable rights and all men are created equal. Im not sure if it says all men in the US are created equal.
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to post by WhatTheory
Anyone can be declared an "enemy combatant" bunky...therein lies the problem with your "terrorists hate us for our freedom" philosophy.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Did you stop to consider that, as human beings, they still deserve human rights? Even POW's have rights under the Geneva Convention & as much as Bush tries to deny it, the USA must still uphold legal Treaties that were enacted even before Bush came anywhere near any Government Office.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to post by WhatTheory
Anyone can be declared an "enemy combatant" bunky...therein lies the problem with your "terrorists hate us for our freedom" philosophy.
This is just NOT true.
Please show me where is says anyone can be declared an "enemy combatant".
Originally posted by Rook1545
Just out of curiosity, would you support the fighters of Iraq or Afganistan taking American soldiers and keeping them detained? They would afterall be enemy combatants.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by Rook1545
Just out of curiosity, would you support the fighters of Iraq or Afganistan taking American soldiers and keeping them detained? They would afterall be enemy combatants.
A) They are not fighters, they are terrorists.
B) They have in the past and then what do they do to them.........Does real torture come to mind and let's not forget the beheadings and their burning corpses hanging from bridges. The detainees in Gitmo have it good.
Originally posted by Rook1545
While they may be terrorists to you
It does not matter what they do to them.
They are captured enemy fighters, and as you have pointed out, they are not local citizens so they do not have the privledge of being extended the rights of the local population.
Originally posted by d11_m_na_c05
Man i can just see you back in the 60's beating blacks cause there "communists"..
Who the $^#$^ do you think you are?
No offense . But there just isn't a such thing as a "terrorist".. I know the word makes everything ok to you .. But the fact is . There just people ..
Screw human rights . Screw what separates us from the animal.
Your type makes me sick .. We seriously need to do away with warning labels so the gene pool can cleanse itself..
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by C0le
No Bush is incorrect as are you, The Constitution lays the foundation for the rights of all men, not just Americans
No it does not!
Why is it called the U.S. Constitution and not the worldwide Constitution?
Are you trying to project our Constitution and rights worldwide? I thought people like you wanted us to stay out of the affairs of others. However, now you seem to want to give the entire world the privileges and rights we have because of our Constitution. Your logic is so faulty it's scary.
Please tell me where in the Constitution that foreign enemies are afforded the rights of U.S. citizens.