It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vor78
No doubt that some of them are, but the vast majority are not.
www.hillaryclintonforum.net...
Take a look through those forums, a really long look. Are those all Republican plants? Go there and accuse them of such and see how far you get.
Domainsbyproxy is a company that hides the identities of those registering their domains...so when they SCAM people, they are much much harder to be found out unless the person scammed is forced to involve law enforcement or the courts to subpoena the information...a lengthy and irritating process. only THIEVES use domainsbyproxy
American Christians get suspended from school for praying before lunch, but American airports are praised for installing Muslim foot basins.
All things progressive? To use a democrats standard line of thinking that "the war in iraq is wrong" ... Democrats have had 5 years to do something about the War that they despise so badly. What have they done? Nothing.
they keep funding the war, thats what. Progressive?
Where's the new energy[?]
(I know you do not consider yourself as a 'conservative' and so let em say I am labeling your argument and not you ).
Your quite right, they have done exceedingly little, much to my dismay. Still, although they are a majority it is a slim enough majority that they can not get past being stonewalled by the Republicans. They simply do not have the votes.
Originally posted by ybab hsur
reply to post by Animal
A majority vote is a majority vote. 51/50 is as slim as it can get and still have a victor, but a victory is a victory.
Originally posted by ybab hsur
reply to post by Animal
But in what way are they progressive? Im really looking for a real answer here...And yes, i mean Alternate fuels. They keep pressuring the republicans. They keep saying "find new fuel!!!"
what have the democrats done?
Its like saying "honey, im hungry, but i hate your cooking, go cook me something really yummy thats completely opposite of what you normally cook, and you are not allowed to have someone else cook it for you"
Thats what the democrats are doing.
This week, the Senate begins debating legislation to "increase the fuel economy of cars and trucks and boosting the use of non-petroleum fuels like ethanol." According to ABC News, the legislation currently being considered would:
* Require that vehicles get 35 miles on the gallon by 2020. This would increase by 4 percent every year.
* Authorize the Energy Department "to make loan guarantees for fuel-efficient vehicle manufacturers and related parts suppliers."
* Increase the use of renewable fuels to 8.5 billion gallons in 2008, and to 36 billion gallons by 2022.
* Give the federal government "more authority to go after oil companies that manipulate gasoline supplies and overcharge consumers at the pump."
It would also:
* Authorize projects "to capture greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and other polluters."
* "Promote energy efficiency in consumer products ranging from light bulbs to big-screen TVs."
Will Republicans try to block this one? Or is their big talk about energy independence just cheap rhetoric? We'll soon find out.
UPDATE: Surprise, surprise... the Republicans offer nothing and block much-needed reform with a filibuster.
In an effort to move the nation towards greater energy independence, House Democratic Whip Hoyer, House Science Committee Ranking Democrat Rep. Bart Gordon and House Armed Services Committee Member Rep. Mark Udall submitted an amendment today to the Fiscal Year 2007 Department of Defense Authorization Bill that would increase the use of alternative fuels in the military. The Department of Defense is the largest single buyer of fuel in America and must be a part of any energy independence effort.