It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A long-awaited Senate Select Intelligence Committee report made public Thursday concludes that President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney made public statements to promote an invasion of Iraq that they knew at the time were not supported by available intelligence.
“Before taking the country to war, this administration owed it to the American people to give them a 100 percent accurate picture of the threat we faced. Unfortunately, our Committee has concluded that the administration made significant claims that were not supported by the intelligence,” said committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV, D- W. Va.
Originally posted by Animal
Okay, again no big surprise to most people. My question is this, are these punishable crimes?
Originally posted by vor78
www.senate.gov...
Measure Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Hypocrisy in action. That's not to excuse the Bush administration if they did lie, but I wonder how many on that Senate Intelligence Committee now issuing this report joined Mr. Rockefeller in being Bush's enabler on the matter?
Originally posted by vor78
www.senate.gov...
Measure Title: A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Hypocrisy in action. That's not to excuse the Bush administration if they did lie, but I wonder how many on that Senate Intelligence Committee now issuing this report joined Mr. Rockefeller in being Bush's enabler on the matter?
Originally posted by vor78
Regardless, the point I'm making is simply this: its ALL about political expediency. There will be no hearings, no trial. Why?
Originally posted by vor78
reply to post by Maxmars
He seems to believe it. This from 2006:
wcbstv.com...
Regardless, the point I'm making is simply this: its ALL about political expediency. There will be no hearings, no trial. Why? Because ultimately, the leadership of the Democratic party is ALSO pulling the wool over everyone's eyes. My belief is that many of them believe in this war as much as the other side does and only began opposing it based on polling data. Of course, it can never be proven and is just speculation, but I'm not buying their side of the story, either.
What do you think the odds are that the Dems will find some convenient excuse to stay in Iraq should Obama win?
[edit on 5-6-2008 by vor78]
Originally posted by Animal
Why? Because too many people, yourself included are too busy to be bothered to stand up for democracy. Shame on you man. Seriously wake up. Ya politics and politicians suck but your words here demonstrate a complete inability to act as a member of a democratic society. It is about time you and yours took on the responsibility we ALL have in a democratic society.
If less of us sat around wallowing in our fatalism MORE could be accomplished, you seriously piss me off.
Originally posted by Animal
Originally posted by vor78
Regardless, the point I'm making is simply this: its ALL about political expediency. There will be no hearings, no trial. Why?
Why? Because too many people, yourself included are too busy to be bothered to stand up for democracy. Shame on you man. Seriously wake up. Ya politics and politicians suck but your words here demonstrate a complete inability to act as a member of a democratic society. It is about time you and yours took on the responsibility we ALL have in a democratic society.
If less of us sat around wallowing in our fatalism MORE could be accomplished, you seriously piss me off.