Ok, this Anon character makes ATS less of what it was. , page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 19-5-2008 @ 07:42 PM by Badge01
reply to post by MrPenny



That thought probably occurred to other users.

I don't see many people responding to that account, either, so it could be that quite a few have it on ign.

Myself, I don't plan on responding to anyone posting that way, nor do I bother reading those posts, though I don't have it on ignore right now.

Maybe the Mgmt will discontinue it, but I'm not hopeful.


reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 07:12 AM by Rockpuck
reply to post by Badge01



No I don't visit other forums, and if I did I would enter my e-mail address for a free account!!

IF I see another thread dragged up from 5 years ago because of some Anonymous twit I swear I am going to scream!!!


reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 08:20 AM by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal
reply to post by roadgravel



Because they will gain confidence and want to become a member. Sometimes people like to feel out the water a little bit before they enter the lake, you know? Sure maybe not ALL Anon's will register, but a few of those constantly lingering one's might just say, "hey... I can just go ahead and create a membership now, I like this."

And by the way, WHAT is so bad about this? I really don't get why so many of you are making such a huge stink, it seems like you almost just want something to be angry about. It hasn't effected me at all and I enjoy some extra input, whether it says anaon under it's title or member.


reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 08:32 AM by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by anxietydisorder
No worries, it's really not a big issue.
For the first time in the years I've been a member here I put an account on "IGNORE".
Just block all posts by "Anonymous ATS" and you'll never see another post by someone not logged in as a member.

To me, this defeats the purpose of "Free Speech." After all, think about all of the "anonymous" protesters in the movie "V" & the similar "V's" that showed up in Washington D.C. last year? Even the
Washington Post heard what they were saying. How can all voices be heard if anyone is ignored?

However, I do agree to the point that Members can come to be known better that the Anon posters...It's easier to understand the basic philosophies of those you know, compared to knowing that any Anon post could be a different person each time. Also, the time-lag between Anon's post following behind Members' responses gets a bit confusing...Sort of like time-jumping during the middle of a conversation.


reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 11:17 AM by Badge01
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to
post by Badge01


No I don't visit other forums, and if I did I would enter my e-mail address for a free account!!


Nonsense. In addition, just because I tried to -explain- why someone would post anonymously doesn't mean I agree with the concept.

I wasted about 5-10 min today clicking on threads which turned out to be as yet unapproved Anonymous-ATS postings. Some are still unapproved from several days ago (which is probably understandable, given the backlog).

Just about ready to click the 'ignore' button on that account.



reply posted on 20-5-2008 @ 07:33 PM by roadgravel
reply to post by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal



I do believe some of these posters may in fact join after getting their feet wet. I still think that the majority will not. I bet there will be some permanent anonymous posters who lurk and post hiding behind the basically nameless anonymous label. Guess that is OK if that is how they want to participate in a discussion forum.

I am not totally against the idea of the anonymous poster. These people will not be part of the community in the real sense but that is their call.

Edit: change 'view' to 'participate'

[edit on 5/20/2008 by roadgravel]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^