Originally posted by 123space
HERE IS VIDEO ANALYSIS YOUTUBE LINK WHO EVER LIKE TO VISIT MOST WELCOME .www.youtube.com...
That's it , I knew you were wrong all the time. This IS NOT a valid video
analysis, nor an evidence. Emanuel Kaos is just a fan of graphic design
but not qualified and he recognized this. Therefore your source is
bad 123 space. I can show you all the mistakes you made in this thread
about the infamous flying witch filmed in Monterrey.
First the title of your thread is wrong. You claim the footage is real
because the video analysis proves it but you did'nt provide the link to
the alleged video analysis until now that I made the request. If you
want to belive what Emanuel Kaos is saying be my guest.
Second, this story was extensively discussed in 2006 and proved to be
just a confusion by the witnesses, even one of them using binoculars
is saying: It's a balloon and this lady was there, looking first hand the
thing. To whom should I belive, her or Emanuel Kaos ? Because you
have not watched the original uncuted footage along with original audio
that is also posted on YouTube you can't make a proper evaluation and
your opinion is based in partial facts. You need to do more research.
Here the links to the original uncuted footage with audio
Third, there were more wirtnesses in that neighborhood who also saw
the thing in the sky and they declared on the local newscast this was
a balloon released from a school ceremony, this statements created
a controversy and the tv network presented a researcher who provided
evidences of the infamous ballooon, this ended the controversy locally
but as the story was entertainment latin network Univision made the report
for their newscast later, the same uploaded on YouTube and subsequently
by The Sun and Fox two years later. Of course you did'nt know this part
of the story because your source is The Sun, Fox and Emanuel Kaos.
You need to make a proper research on this case 123 space.
Fourth, this Flying Witch footage has nothing to do with the police officer
Leonardo Samaniego case that happened in January 16, 2004 wich is a
strong case. This flying witch incident you posted took place in May 17,
2006 in a different location so there is no connection. Also the interview to
a police officer by the Univision Primer Impacto report is from another
incident not related to the Flying Witch 2006 story nor the Leonardo
Samaniego 2004 story. It's just an incident that took place in Villa de
Garcia .N.L. in wich this police officer was involved saying two witches with
wings arrived on a car and confronted him with malevolous intentions, a
weak story with no evidences that caused more laughs than serious
reactions but as I said this was entertainment and Univision bought
the story. Then the school teacher Ana Luisa Cid mixed the three cases
in a percolator and came along with the article that she sent to tabloid
The Sun. These are documented facts.
If you still want to rely on The Sun and Emanuel Kaos it's your choice.
It would have been better if you know more about this case before
claiming it's real bcause of an alleged video analysis. In my personal
conclusion after studying all the facts, testimonials, interviews, videos
and opinions I remain skeptic at this point based on the evidences
provided by those who have been there.
However I still can't say without a reasonable doubt this story is real
or just a confusion and besides I was not there. The footage is real in
the sense that the sighting happened and something was flying in the
sky and there were several witnesses. But they may be mistaken on what
they saw, it happens very often. Some witnesses came forward saying it
was a balloon. Was this thing a real flying witch ? I don't think so.