It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


HUMANLIKE UFO Spotted in 2006 Mexico is real proved by Video Analysis ??

page: 3
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in


posted on May, 7 2008 @ 03:16 PM
Looks like a witch on a broom stick flying over the mountain

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 03:24 PM
Why you said its witch ?because your brain was trained to see some thing like this kind of HUMANLIKE UFO as witch .Because that we ready & told in story's.
It could be advanced technology or some kind of humanoid .But that for sure its not a balloon as others shouting here in this thread if you look at movement on that hill you can see that body moving like human moves on land & thn takes of as well.

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:06 PM
I would like to add my 2 cents to this one.

If this thread is about the "Flying humanoid", then it has been covered some zillions times so it would be just yet another one of the endless series.
But it seems that it's based on something new, an "analysis", right?

I read, in the title of this thread:
HUMANLIKE UFO Spotted in 2006 Mexico is real proved by Video Analysis !!

Since i don't see any question mark, i assume that this one is a statement.
(Ed: now the title has been edited)

In the blog in question, linked in the OP, the title reads:
Humanlike UFO Spotted in 2006 Mexico could be real !!

There's a difference, and it doesn't look to be a slight one.
The blog says that COULD BE REAL while you say IS REAL.

That said: you are right, let's take a look at the video

Emanet Kaos

The "analyst" states beforehand that he's NOT a technical expert, nor he's very skilled in use of photographic filters or techniques.

Basically, he's not an analyst


So what do we have here?
A cropped image, bicubic resampled, cropped from a lossy compressed video of YouTube:
1)Chrome cylinder? May i ask WHY chrome and WHY cylinder? And even if it's a chrome cylinder, what is supposed to PROVE?
And what is supposed to prove the "shadow consistant through every frame" ? Conclusion achieved after watching a bunch of misplaced pixels due to lossy comprssion on a fourth/fifth/more generation video?

2) Head, Harms, Hands, Panel, Knees

So what? He sees all this stuff, ok, but so WHAT?

but the funniest part is the third one:

I'll not bother with anymore text, just watch the clips and decide for yourself

Ok, we are in democracy, but hey this is the first time that i see a self-service analysis.

Basically, this is NOT an analysis: this is an opinion of a guy who is simply saying what's his take on this video, as anyone else is able and entitled to do HERE on ATS as well as elsewhere. My take is that the guy made some constructions, and that his construction have been misinterpreted to say the least.

Just my 2 cents.

[edit on 7/5/2008 by internos]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:18 PM
Hi internos,
Thanks for stopping if i do remember ufo paris sighting post by me & you were there as well.Anyway please check this you tube video and who you say about it .....

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:24 PM
internos that the one of it its not that one we got in news . But when we talk about analysis .that was done by same process.

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:29 PM

FOXNEWS.COM :“I think that the possibility is there,” Cid said. “An imaginary object is not recorded on film, nor does it produce over 40 witnesses.”

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:32 PM
reply to post by internos

I have to say I am in total agreement with internos about this one all except for the number of times these "humanoid" videos get posted especially this one, I think it is more along the lines of gigazillions.

And as for the statement that this guy is THE leading ufo expert in Mexico than I guess there has to be a job opening down there.

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:35 PM

Originally posted by 123space
Hi internos,
Thanks for stopping if i do remember ufo paris sighting post by me & you were there as well.Anyway please check this you tube video and who you say about it .....

Hi mate: perhaps the blog of UFO over Paris was another one, i can't remember right now
I would like to point out that in my opinion it's really hard to make some serious analysis, especially when we haven't enough informations.
It's clear that this would have been a very interesting news, (BTW i've received a Google alert about this analysis).
The case, is puzzling
I know it, i know how many different theories have been exposed. But the problem is that when we have a 28 secs. video and nothing else, or just a witness, then it's too hard to assess what really we are looking at

Of course, i'm not stating that this is a hoax, because i have no clue what's what i would see in the original, uncutted footage.
Nothing can be said, i mean seriously, about this video: we see a shape, we see it barely, it could be anything, the quality of the video is poor, we have no clue if it has been somehow processed, neither just brightened.
I mean, we know almost NOTHING about this video.
If you ask me, i don recall to have ever seen a convincing debunk, a conclusive one, i mean. I mean, the case IS open, but the analysis made by this guy neither add nor subtract anything to the original sighting.
We are at the same point we were yesterday, this is what i mean

[edit on 7/5/2008 by internos]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:39 PM

I got all three links plus all that material .......what you hav eto say about ?

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:46 PM
reply to post by 123space

They are articles that are reporting exactly the same news:
Ana Luisa Cid claimed that the video could be genuine.

It happens when someone makes a press release to a news agency or something like that.

But my question is: before A.L.C. statement and after it, what has actually changed?

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:46 PM
I think let me clearly ask every one here

Q.1. Is this a balloon ?
Q.2.In Analysis which i posted could be same as original done by Anna Luisa ....
movement of that ufo bottom area look like humans walk on surface .What urs views about it?

i think to know about that i post that thread here.


[edit on 7-5-2008 by 123space]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:50 PM

Originally posted by The Coward
reply to post by 123space


I am getting tired of all the disinformation around this whole UFO topic. Flying Witches and Wizards? WTF!?

Mexico's Jaime Maussan is so full of it, that guy must have been paid to lie or something. Not that this story says anything about him, but I bet he has his hands in all of this. It's getting ridiculous!

You are so right to be mad. You have all the right to be tired. Is is insane, what's next? Flying deer? A bearded man in a red suit? Disinformation indeed....or...what disinformation do you mean exactly? Of what track are we leaded here, that this are a bunch of balloons??

ps. Emotions are garbage, feelings are OK.

[edit on 7-5-2008 by Pjotr]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:53 PM
Paris ufo sighting link here for you'

reply to post by internos

[edit on 7-5-2008 by 123space]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:54 PM
Sorry guys but this is a hoax and for sure Jaime Mausan is involve, in that video u cant see a face or a body or something that you can tell 100% sure, is a flying human... anyways, take a look the next video, is a Flying Witch

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 04:59 PM
reply to post by 123space

Ahhh, i remember mate:
ROME sighting, vatican heck !!!

Too bad we had a confirmation that they have DESTROYED all the videos before may of the year in question, ONE MONTH after that sighting:
hsur2112 has been so kind to contact them, and we have had also a confirmation from other sources.
There will be a meeting in late May, and if i'm correct someone of them has a VHS of the video: i don't promise nothing, but as always i'll do all my best:
i'm very interested in that video too.

[edit on 7/5/2008 by internos]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 06:45 PM

Originally posted by 123space

That's it , I knew you were wrong all the time. This IS NOT a valid video
analysis, nor an evidence. Emanuel Kaos is just a fan of graphic design
but not qualified and he recognized this. Therefore your source is
bad 123 space. I can show you all the mistakes you made in this thread
about the infamous flying witch filmed in Monterrey.

First the title of your thread is wrong. You claim the footage is real
because the video analysis proves it but you did'nt provide the link to
the alleged video analysis until now that I made the request. If you
want to belive what Emanuel Kaos is saying be my guest.

Second, this story was extensively discussed in 2006 and proved to be
just a confusion by the witnesses, even one of them using binoculars
is saying: It's a balloon and this lady was there, looking first hand the
thing. To whom should I belive, her or Emanuel Kaos ? Because you
have not watched the original uncuted footage along with original audio
that is also posted on YouTube you can't make a proper evaluation and
your opinion is based in partial facts. You need to do more research.

Here the links to the original uncuted footage with audio

Third, there were more wirtnesses in that neighborhood who also saw
the thing in the sky and they declared on the local newscast this was
a balloon released from a school ceremony, this statements created
a controversy and the tv network presented a researcher who provided
evidences of the infamous ballooon, this ended the controversy locally
but as the story was entertainment latin network Univision made the report
for their newscast later, the same uploaded on YouTube and subsequently
by The Sun and Fox two years later. Of course you did'nt know this part
of the story because your source is The Sun, Fox and Emanuel Kaos.
You need to make a proper research on this case 123 space.

Fourth, this Flying Witch footage has nothing to do with the police officer
Leonardo Samaniego case that happened in January 16, 2004 wich is a
strong case. This flying witch incident you posted took place in May 17,
2006 in a different location so there is no connection. Also the interview to
a police officer by the Univision Primer Impacto report is from another
incident not related to the Flying Witch 2006 story nor the Leonardo
Samaniego 2004 story. It's just an incident that took place in Villa de
Garcia .N.L. in wich this police officer was involved saying two witches with
wings arrived on a car and confronted him with malevolous intentions, a
weak story with no evidences that caused more laughs than serious
reactions but as I said this was entertainment and Univision bought
the story. Then the school teacher Ana Luisa Cid mixed the three cases
in a percolator and came along with the article that she sent to tabloid
The Sun. These are documented facts.

If you still want to rely on The Sun and Emanuel Kaos it's your choice.
It would have been better if you know more about this case before
claiming it's real bcause of an alleged video analysis. In my personal
conclusion after studying all the facts, testimonials, interviews, videos
and opinions I remain skeptic at this point based on the evidences
provided by those who have been there.

However I still can't say without a reasonable doubt this story is real
or just a confusion and besides I was not there. The footage is real in
the sense that the sighting happened and something was flying in the
sky and there were several witnesses. But they may be mistaken on what
they saw, it happens very often. Some witnesses came forward saying it
was a balloon. Was this thing a real flying witch ? I don't think so.

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 07:00 PM
Maybe we should bring guns with us all the time so we can shoot down UFOs, but that'll risk intergalactical warfare...

Idk... I still want to shoot an alien down.

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 07:50 PM
reply to post by 123space

This video has been done to death before. It's been discussed, debated, and debunked before.

Why do people always recycle and recycle and recycle old stuff? There's nothing new anymore in this forum.

All the same old same old. There's new nothing anymore. Stop adding to the already humonguous pile....

[edit on 7-5-2008 by Macrotus]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 07:55 PM

Originally posted by blimpseeker
here is a better video of it.

[edit on 7-5-2008 by blimpseeker]

Why post pointless videos? You've already made your view clear so why do you persist on repeating it and now add pointless clips?

Nice to have a laugh eh. Things like this don't help ATS at all.

[edit on 7-5-2008 by bloodcircle]

posted on May, 7 2008 @ 07:59 PM

Originally posted by free_spirit

I don′t see any video analysis here 123 space and yet you continue saying check the
video analysis.

It's the 3'rd video on the page which is right under -

Humanlike UFO Analysis video.

I don't believe the video shows anything but a hoax, but I do believe the OP deserves rational replies from members here.

Or we may aswell rename ATS to

<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in