It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dan Tanna
First of all let me say that the aircraft was not a B-2 bomber, the trailing edge was one piece as i tried to show you in the picture. It also was not that massive, alot slimmer and again no cockpit.
As for that video on metcalf, that unmanned plane was almost identical, except the engines had a curved lip over the intakes as i tried to explain, as did the exhaust - other than a slightly larger bulge and slightly wider too it is 90% identical to what I saw.
Sorta understandable since I'm sure you were rushing to get a shot off. Didd you happen to take more then one? Even if the quality isn't as good I'd like to take a look at em.
The picture is blurry and for that I make no apologise - its simply all i could get.
Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
What's the big deal with a B-2 crashing anyway? it's ANCIENT technology already, it was cutting edge 17 years ago, the technology we have no is much more superior to this.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Rasputin13
There has never, and probably will never be a B-2 based in Afghanistan. As for testing, they probably are flying out of one of our bases in country. If something were to happen, and they couldn't recover it very quickly, I'm sure they would hit it with an airstrike ASAP.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
There has never, and probably will never be a B-2 based in Afghanistan. As for testing, they probably are flying out of one of our bases in country. If something were to happen, and they couldn't recover it very quickly, I'm sure they would hit it with an airstrike ASAP.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Nobody suggesting that its a fake?
What a/c was that pic taken from? If its civilian then that pic should be a fake IMHO.
Where are all the fake-foto experts on this?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
What felony? There is no law against taking pictures of military planes. I have hundreds of pictures taken over the years of them in flight, or parked on the flight line.
And it wouldn't necessarily have any kind of alert system if it was a UAV. They would rely more on the AWACS to keep them clear of traffic.
Besides these, the Air Force is looking at one other forward operating location - a Middle East location that the Air Force will not identify publicly but which Gen. Michael Ryan, the Air Force chief of staff, said "we're looking at" for what he termed "other capabilities."
Originally posted by Daedalus3
At the distance the plane seems to be, even a comm airline radar would pick it up and set off the auto anti-collision climb.
If the jet is military, the the person taking the pic has committed a felony of a very serious degree.
New hangars establish bomber deployment option
by 1st Lt. Ed Gulick
509th Bomb Wing Public Affairs
12/17/2004 - WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, Mo. (AFPN) -- The B-2 Spirit now has a new home away from home.
Officials at Royal Air Force Fairford, England, recently unveiled two climate-controlled permanent hangars specifically designed for the B-2. The new 50,000-square-foot facilities allow specialized low-observable-surface maintenance to be performed.
“Low-observable maintenance is the backbone of the B-2,” said Col. Chris Matson, 509th Maintenance Group commander. “Having the (dock) at Fairford allows us to do this critical process faster and better.”
The maintenance is essential to maintaining the specialized coatings that cover the aircraft’s composite and metal skin. Applying these coatings, and ensuring they cure correctly, must be done in a climate-controlled environment, said Master Sgt. Brian Tobin, of the 509th Maintenance Squadron.
Forward basing B-2s at Fairford saves about 16 hours of flight time across the Atlantic Ocean and will enable the bombers to reach targets sooner, Colonel Matson said.
“Staging the B-2 closer to potential theater engagement areas will provide a deterrent to adversaries of the United States,” said Lt. Col. Tom Bussiere, 325th Bomb Squadron commander. “The completion of the B-2 shelter is a step in the right direction in making RAF Fairford a fully operational B-2 forward operating base.”
The $19 million hangar complex was completed seven months ahead of schedule, officials said.
Originally posted by waynos
Firstly I agree with Canada in his exposition on why it is a B-2, this was exactly the line of study I was following and was surprised to see someone posting almost exactly my own thoughts (spooky!). .... I viewed the image also as if it was a single spike, like some fakes I have myself (I'll post them if you like - the best way to see how a fake looks is to make some)
Is it a fake? Technically, it could easily be (even the ones I knocked together looked completely real to me) but you would have to ask yourself what's the point?
According to Frank Cappuccio, the head of Skunk Works, the Polecat demonstration programme was configured to give Lockheed Martin an insight into three areas critical to next-generation UAVs: reducing the manufacturing costs associated with new, largely composite airframe designs; lowering the capital cost of UAV manufacture through advanced tooling techniques; and integrating a fully autonomous flight control and mission-handling system that will allow future UAVs to conduct their missions, from take-off to landing, without the intervention of human operators.
Polecat technology could lead to two operational vehicles, according to Cappuccio: an intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) vehicle with a U-2-like (1,800 kg) sensor payload and a 24-hour endurance; or a long-range strike aircraft with a 6,800 kg payload and a 3,700 km operational radius. He added, however, that Lockheed Martin is still pushing the idea of a supersonic UCAS for the LRS mission, citing studies that show that it would be seven times more survivable than a subsonic UCAS and five times better than the FB-22 bomber derivative of the F-22 fighter