 |
|
Topic started on 28-4-2008 @ 05:50 AM by Harlequin
|
www.gripen.com...
^^
Saab have offered 48 Gripen NG as the requirement for Norways F16 replacement and FCA (future combat aircraft) this would be instead of the F35 , and
being honest bang for buck its the best option for them (and swiss fighters as well)
www.cnbc.com...
^^ Saab have formally tendered the Gripen NG for the MMRCA competition within India for 126 aircraft , incompetition to the Boeing F/A18 offered on
friday
EADS throws the typhoon into the mix later on today/ early tommorrow as well
edit
www.defense-aerospace.com...
VV picture of the proposed aircraft carrying
In its multirole configuration, Gripen IN can be armed with 2 Python V missiles on Station 1 (L&R), four Derby BVR missiles Stations 2 (L&R) on twin
launchers, four GBU-12 LGBs on Twin Store Carriers fitted to Stations 5 (L&R), plus 2x 300 US gallon Fuel Drop tanks on Station 3 (L&R). Station 4 is
fitted with Laser Designator Pod, and Station 5 is empty.
taken from
www.defense-aerospace.com...
hmmmm do either US offering have IRST yet? i know the USN hornets have got a contract last year to develop one but they are not in use as yet (or
even built afaik)
[edit on 28/4/08 by Harlequin]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 07:34 AM by Jezza
|
The Swedish offer also includes a broad spectrum of Swedish cooperation with Norwegian industries all over Norway, exceeding 100 percent of the Gripen
order value.
This will be interesting where this goes??
I think the NG will turn out to be a great plane.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 08:09 AM by Harlequin
|
As i mentioned earlier in the year Norway signed an industrial co-operaton agreement with saab last year - and are allready benefiting from it ,
whereas the money sink called the F35 , they have spent $$$millions on for effectively nothing - i really think Norway AND denmark will buy into the
Gripen NG;
as for India? who know - the Mig Gripen and F16 are what they are looking for really - the others , although nice are treading on the MKI toes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 08:12 AM by SickSoul
|
reply to post by Jezza
Well the airforce prefer F35 from a operational point of view, however
Gripen is a perfect choice for the socialists when Norway is to pull out of
NATO.
The goverment dont want to buy anything made in America these days.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 08:45 AM by emile
|
Who are willing to analysis will Norway wait F-35?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 09:55 AM by Harlequin
|
reply to post by SickSoul
might be `perfect` but cost is the main factor - and given the choice of 24 F35`s or 48 gripen for the same money - numbers will win
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 10:32 AM by Harlequin
|
Thales norway have a 2 billion NOK business arrangement that could potentially be worth alot more if further sales go ahead , KDA have over 12 billion
NOK of business and Nammo and Simrad have 1 billion and 6 billion of business respectively
the Gripen NG will be worth alot of money to norway , so they would be rather silly not to take this opportunity and run with it - 100% offsets is
worth massive money.
[edit on 28/4/08 by Harlequin]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 12:12 PM by WestPoint23
|
Originally posted by Harlequin
hmmmm do either US offering have AESA and IRST yet? i know the USN hornets have got a contract last year to develop one but they are not in use as yet
(or even built afaik)
[edit on 28/4/08 by Harlequin] 
Are you referring to the F-16 and Super Hornet? If so then yes both have an AESA option and there are currently a significant number of both types
with operational AESA radars in service.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 01:26 PM by Harlequin
|
reply to post by WestPoint23
i just meant IRST and not aesa , we both know the us has the most varied types of aesa sets in teh world to date
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 02:08 PM by SickSoul
|
Originally posted by Harlequin
Thales norway have a 2 billion NOK business arrangement that could potentially be worth alot more if further sales go ahead , KDA have over 12 billion
NOK of business and Nammo and Simrad have 1 billion and 6 billion of business respectively
the Gripen NG will be worth alot of money to norway , so they would be rather silly not to take this opportunity and run with it - 100% offsets is
worth massive money.
[edit on 28/4/08 by Harlequin] 
Sweden is a neutral country in case of a war, but that doesn't stop anybody who attacks Norway attacking them as well.
In a war that means no more spare parts.
Due to the Norwegian/American mutual business arrangement concerning the F16 and the upgraded F16
Norsk sensor teknikk alone have a deal with Boeing worth 9 billions for sensors for the B777.
Then we have Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk/Nato, Pivco/Ford, Norwegian Aluminium/GM (millitary and civilian),
and many many more.
Add that the F35 is brand new technology and Gripen a upgrade of old stuff, and the picture changes.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-4-2008 @ 02:22 PM by Harlequin
|
The issue as norway have said is one of cost - the real world cost of the F35 is rising which makes the gripen far more attractive to them
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-4-2008 @ 05:54 AM by C0bzz
|
This sounds horrible, and is highly unsubstanciated.... but I hope India never gets the Gripen NG. It would be nice if aircraft like this would stay
from the Region they're developed. Heh....
Anyone agree?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-4-2008 @ 06:42 AM by kilcoo316
|
Originally posted by SickSoul
Due to the Norwegian/American mutual business arrangement concerning the F16 and the upgraded F16
Norsk sensor teknikk alone have a deal with Boeing worth 9 billions for sensors for the B777.
Could you explain this a bit more please?
Also, bear in mind Lockheed are the main contractor for the F-35, not Boeing (while they do make some parts, I do not imagine them putting civilian
contracts at risk over it).
The gripen also has an American engine.
Then we have Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk/Nato, Pivco/Ford, Norwegian Aluminium/GM (millitary and civilian),
and many many more.

Irrelevant.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-4-2008 @ 01:26 AM by Harlequin
|
reply to post by SickSoul
 Sweden is a neutral country in case of a war, but that doesn't stop anybody who attacks Norway attacking them as well.
In a war that means no more spare parts. 
after more in depth reading there is a ToT (transfer of technology) in detail , allowing spare parts for maintain operations to be manufactured
locally.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-4-2008 @ 01:23 PM by intelgurl
|
Originally posted by SickSoul
Sweden is a neutral country in case of a war, but that doesn't stop anybody who attacks Norway attacking them as well.
In a war that means no more spare parts. 
That could be a scenario for any country that manufactures aircraft - however, you have to look at the likelihood of a nation getting in a war and at
present I don't see any potential war on the horizon for scandinavia...
The Grippen's a good aircraft, and the tech transfer offering they have made has certainly made Saab a serious player, I don't think they'll win
the competition, but they are serious.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-4-2008 @ 03:17 PM by xmotex
|
reply to post by C0bzz
No, I don't get it.
Why does it matter? India has money and SAAB has planes.
What's with the loadouts of Pythons & Derby's, is that specifically for the Indian offer? Or is that a South African loadout?
And what exactly are the upgrades the Gripen NG gets anyway, are they only avionics upgrades, or does it get the F414 engine too?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 01:10 AM by C0bzz
|
reply to post by xmotex
It's like making a replica Spitfire, painting Nazi simbols all over it and pretending it's an FW-190.
National pride type thing I guess.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 01:53 AM by Harlequin
|
engine: F414G based upon the current SH F414-GE-400 engine , with 22,000lb thrust
cockpit : Gripen's new avionics suite will include an AESA radar - supplied by Thales; Other avionics include flight management computers, switching
and data transfer units, video processors, head-up display and cockpit displays all to be delivered by Rockwell Collins.
undercarraige has been moved to a slightly different position allowing increased stores carriage
edit:
www.flightglobal.com...
some more details there
[edit on 1/5/08 by Harlequin]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 02:00 AM by _Del_
|
Slightly off topic, but related closely enough that I don't see the point in a new thread: Does any know what the state of the Swiss RFP for F-5
replacement is?
I know that Boeing withdrew an offer. The Typhoon seems unlikely. Is it between Rafale and Gripen now? This seems to be a perfect customer for SAAB to
add.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2008 @ 03:33 AM by Harlequin
|
given some of the price coments about rafale made with the failed morrocco deal - i think tbh saab are the only realistic option
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |